The "Liu Yang Incident" caused a heated discussion. What should Si Manan do after being criticized by the media?

1, whether Lenovo China or China Lenovo, are our national brands. From a big perspective, we should have the responsibility and obligation to love and protect national brands. To some extent, Mr Si Manan can question them, but he has no right to judge and characterize them.

2. In the case of Liu Yang, technology and income generation are two different concepts. Throughout the long river of history, there is only one choice, and there is no example of both. We can't ignore the life and death of a company because of Liu Yang's merits and demerits. I dare ask Mr. Si Manan, if Lenovo collapses, can you resettle the workers under his name?

3. As a media person, Mr. Si Manan clung to the Liu Yang incident and was inevitably suspected of stealing traffic. Put yourself in others' shoes. If you were a company headed by Liu Yang, what would you choose? Many people will be wise afterwards, but what's the point of doing so?

Si Manan's six-question association embodies the country's civilization, social progress and the improvement of people's democratic consciousness. The problem of Si Manan should be the problem of the people and the country, and it is the problem of the incident itself, not the problem of one person. If you must say Liu, then Liu Chuanzhi can give an inevitable explanation. If people want to summon something, they must respond.

Give the people a confession and clear their names. As soon as it is interrupted, it is chaotic. Long pain is better than short pain. As for the problem, blocking is absolutely not desirable. Everything should be guided by the situation. What is important is to guide, vent anger and understand public opinion. Why was Da Yu's father Kun exiled by Emperor Yao? Was executed by Shun Di? Is it because it is not easy to control water, but simply to block it? The reason for Dayu's success is "sparse" rather than "blocked".

The problem has come out and is on the table. Then the parties need to come out to clarify and cooperate with relevant departments to explain clearly. Now that everyone knows, everyone is talking about it. It is a bit unorthodox to simply avoid it or just launch some water forces to tackle key problems! Sensibility, rationality and legality are meaningless!

In this case, it is inevitable to attack Sima accounting morally. James is just a drug introduction. If he has personal moral problems, it will not prevent hundreds of millions of people who eat melons from continuing to ask someone.