Who is Xu Bin, Dean of College of Humanities, Zhejiang Gongshang University?

This is my last speech as dean, and it is also a farewell speech. It is gratifying that the management team of this school of humanities has completed the work it should do for three years, maintained the normal operation of teaching and scientific research in the school of humanities, and made all the faculty and students safe. As for the various achievements and evaluations valued by the system, they are fleeting and not worth mentioning. If something has been done badly in recent years, whether it is the school's opinion or the teachers and students' opinion, I will bear it. You are very enthusiastic about me, a liberal.

Unexpectedly, the result of this routine transition was that the last management team was completely annihilated, although the reasons were different. I am an "old rice cake merchant", and I work with Wei Bao in turn. The two vice presidents returned to their favorite majors with deep humanistic feelings. However, it is also a good thing to see through it. Inadvertently, I got rid of the old routine of "combining the old with the new", and the new dean and secretary can go into battle lightly and think independently.

I have spoken countless times in six and a half years, most of which are random and have no theme. For the last time, I thought of a topic: "Children with childlike innocence go home."

This time, 1970 1 month retired from the system after 40 years of work. Although I still have to teach for a few years, I left the system from my heart.

This passage tells the reason why I don't want to be re-elected as dean.

My generation, unfortunately and fortunately, lived in an era of great cultural subversion and difficult reconstruction, and experienced and saw things that ordinary people could not understand. At this time, I wanted to do something academic, so I went to college. When listening to the class, I found that everything the university teachers say and do seems to be an "institutionalized" propaganda tool, which is disappointing because materialism and class struggle can't be separated. Fortunately, at present, my tutor Mr. Wang is an old pedant who looks at the academic style of the Republic of China. With his encouragement, my reading scope is mainly the works of literature and scholars, such as Chen Yinque and Qian Mu. The course of postgraduate entrance examination made me know and like the frankness, freedom and freedom of metaphysics.

But there is another sentence that has played a role in my destiny: times are stronger than people, and people are worse than the sky. In the changes of the times, the spring tide will also sweep you. Reform and opening up are in full swing, opening up the closed state of the country. All the intellectuals in China are excited by a chance, and I am no exception. After graduating from graduate school, I chose the Institute of Sociology of the Provincial Academy of Social Sciences to devote myself to the investigation of Wenzhou phenomenon and the study of private economy, which opened my eyes to the difficult start of private economy. 1988 wrote "Sociological Reflections on the Dual Structure of Wenzhou Society", which was selected by the Central Committee as "theoretical seminar to commemorate the 10th anniversary of the Third Plenary Session of the 11th CPC Central Committee" and was considered as a national award.

By 1992, the editor-in-chief of Learning and Thinking was retiring, and the leaders of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences asked me to take over. They said: Deng Xiaoping's speech in the south liberated his mind again. He was appointed as a result. I remembered Jiang Yang's words on the spot after Qian Zhongshu was appointed vice president of China Academy of Social Sciences, saying that Zhong Shu was "arrested in a general's office". Fortunately, I don't regard this position as an official in my heart, and the editor-in-chief is just a platform for doing things, just like I am the dean. Besides, my idea is very clear. I am in charge of a piece of land within the system and don't use the tools of the system. I don't care what achievements I add to it. Second, not for the name, profit and official in the personal management system; Third, starting from one's own conscience and right and wrong, consciously resist and eliminate the false and empty ills in the system.

At that time, "Learning and Thinking" was a provincial-level theoretical journal, and provincial party committee leaders and military generals often published articles on it, which was regarded as one of the best places to know and get close to senior leaders, and many people gave me advice. I, on the other hand, want to run a publication that tells the truth and has cultural taste, and minimize falsehood. After a period of time, these leaders were gradually eliminated and replaced by Wang Yuanhua, Du Weiming and Zheng Zhongying. At that time, the situation seemed to be moving forward, and I was not willing to stop there, so I renamed the publication Observation and Thinking, and designed and launched a series of distinctive portraits and critical themes: China people who were received, China people who smoked, and so on. The press in Zhejiang province exclaimed. When leaving observation and thinking, many people advised that what a good location and comfortable scenery, you can enter and retreat. But my ideal is to run a publication that tells the truth. If it can't be realized, it will be used as a springboard for promotion and wealth.

In 2002, I came to Zhejiang Gongshang University. Do it at the magazine first. In two years, I completed the transformation from a journalist to a scholar and completed the biography of Wang Chong.

In 2004, the School of Humanities was established, and the school leaders mobilized me to be the dean. At that time, I was comfortable as the president of a magazine. When I had time to do research, I didn't want to move. School leaders said, why do you want to read a lifetime manuscript, gain more life experience and feel the mainstream of China University? Besides, taking more classes and seeing more girls sitting in the front row will refresh you. I had to answer with a smile. After the first session, some things are only done halfway, and then the second session will continue. In fact, after being re-elected for more than a year, I knew that I was not suitable for this administrative post. At the beginning of 2009, I asked the school to hire another Gao Ming and help contact the successor.

Why not adapt? The deeper we go, the more we feel that the administration and power of colleges and universities are becoming more and more serious, especially the undergraduate teaching evaluation, which has been openly faked and has lost the minimum university spirit. In recent years, the popularity of digital evaluation ranking in colleges and universities has made all levels frantically grasp projects, topics, awards, points and bases, and superiors do whatever they take. The administrative power has wantonly violated the right to education and academic rights, making it impossible to put down the "quiet desk". If someone asks me, what is the biggest experience of more than six years? I said, first, I don't have the energy to seriously consider the real teaching and scientific research problems, but I am just tired of coping with the so-called "innovation and strengthening the school" index issued by my superiors; Second, acts that violate common sense and even fraud activities in colleges and universities are actually very popular. It can be said that in the past six years, the school has held countless meetings and assigned countless tasks, and has never really advocated the spirit of university and academic freedom, adhered to the conscience of scholars, dared to criticize the government, and shouldered social responsibilities. Although I have talked about college spirit several times, it is just a signboard. What we really need to do is how to please ZF, give gifts to tackle key problems, and compete for projects and important topics. This is a university realm, is it a university bearing? In civilized countries, this is a taboo in academic circles, and scholars must keep a distance from the government. I am reminded of a visit by Mrs Si Nuo in the 1990s. In view of her difficult life, the China Municipal Government hopes to give some help in the form of lecture fees, which is also a thank-you to Si Nuo for helping the China revolution in the past. Mrs Si Nuo refused. She said: What Si Nuo and I said in the world was believed by some people, because they believed that we had no interest relationship with the government, and everything they said came from our independent observation. If I take the money, no one will believe us in the future, even what I said before. Do the leaders and scholars of Huada have such thoughts and consciousness now? Not only do they try their best to ask the government for money, but even when they ask for money, they will give gifts and pay bribes by hook or by crook. All this is in the grand name: make the school bigger and stronger! Utilitarianism is above everything else, and conscience and right and wrong are worthless. Is this normal?

The topic that the leaders of all departments of the school are talking about together is: how to implement the evaluation index of the school and design a plan to force the following to do the best; Emphasize the importance of this department and hope that the leaders will take special care of it; The department evaluates the first and second in the whole school; How to achieve the goal by engaging in relationships and taking the road; Everyone cares more about each other. You help me this time, and I will help you next time ... The ancients emphasized persuading people to be virtuous, and it is popular here to persuade people to be profitable. I can see clearly that today's university is a combination of Qiuba culture and peasant culture, with a so-called "quantitative management". There is only one basis for doing things, that is, "having milk is a mother." To put it mildly, it is called "seeking food without seeking Tao" Power does whatever it wants in this field, which is not only the biggest problem in the world, but also the biggest problem in all industries in China. Therefore, in recent years, the criticism of education, especially higher education, has become louder and louder, which can be said to have lost people's trust.

I heard from a teacher in the school this morning that education ranks first among the "top ten immoral" industries evaluated online. I'm not surprised to hear that. I recently went to the northeast to give lectures, and met all kinds of people along the way. Speaking of the professors and scholars in China today, the general reaction is that they are not worthy of respect, their level is not so good, and they dare not tell the truth. They can be ruthless for money. Nothing illustrates the crisis of education better than this phenomenon: nowadays, rich and powerful people try their best to send their children abroad for education, including the leaders of the Ministry of Education and the children of many university presidents. Can they attach importance to their education? Scholars' virtue of "bowing to power" and giving money to do whatever they want is actually looked down upon by officials from the bottom of their hearts and doesn't take you seriously at all. I experienced one thing. In 2006, I had a "preservation" activity. At that time, a deputy secretary of the provincial party committee visited China Academy of Fine Arts. A teacher is writing, saying that she doesn't understand and ignores it. The deputy secretary was furious and severely criticized the "preservation" activities of the Academy of Fine Arts, delaying the acceptance. When our school conveyed this matter, it was fortunate that our school passed smoothly, and there was still some schadenfreude for the Academy of Fine Arts. In 1950s, Peng Zhen visited Lin in Union Medical College Hospital, and Lin was treating patients, which made Peng Zhen respect Lin more. Don't say that compared with the intellectuals of the Republic of China, living in the forest 50 years ago is enough to make us feel ashamed and have no self-esteem, so how can we make others respect us?

In this system, I fell into an inevitable contradiction. I can't criticize the system casually like most so-called scholar leaders, and at the same time get huge benefits from the system. It's not that I don't know how to make money. I just use my resources to invite officials who have mastered the project, editors of high-level publications, academic judges and so on. Give lectures and pay bribes with public funds in disguise. Go to honor and give gifts on holidays. Then you can take up projects, send articles and win awards in the name of contributing to schools and colleges, and gradually you will become a famous artist and judge. In recent years, I have been in a very favorable position to do this kind of thing, and the relevant interest chain has been laid out in front of me, but I despise it. My moral bottom line doesn't allow it. Since these are all things I criticize, I will never go with the flow.

China's biggest problem is also a common problem of many intellectuals, that is to say, separation, duality of personality, and even to the point of unconsciousness. A critic who is passionate about the shortcomings of the system, the purpose of his behavior is not to reform the system, but to turn around and participate in it, without even feeling guilty. This is not the wish of my hometown. What is this?

I choose a critical attitude, so I won't behave differently. Everyone disliked the evaluation of undergraduate education in 2006, but the school asked the evaluation team to stand up and applaud for a long time. I was the only one in the auditorium that day who didn't stand up and applaud. Why do people have to be so fake and so cheap? Why can't you openly express your disgust or opposition? In 2008, the school carried out the so-called "accelerated development" reform plan. During the group discussion, I expressed different opinions. When Secretary Jiang asked me to speak at the conference, I frankly said at the conference that the current university is "seeking food without seeking Tao". At the end of 2009, I was going to refuse to sign the 20% growth responsibility letter, so it doesn't matter if I step down. To this end, I found Secretary Jiang. Secretary Jiang said in his work that it would be frozen if he didn't sign it. Anyway, there will be a "three-set" plan this year, and it will be adjusted then. That's how I reluctantly signed the contract. At the beginning of last year, the school held a party congress, and the group discussion was attended by school leaders. I am not in tune for talk. Everyone insisted that I say a few words, so I said, "Universities have party committees and party congresses. This is a common reality, but is it the real way of a university? I'm afraid only North Korea and Cuba have such a system in the world. I haven't heard that any world-class university is successful under the leadership of the Party Committee, and I haven't heard that any Party Committee has run a world-recognized first-class university. The direction and outlet of China university reform lies in the integration with world universities. If not, there is no hope to learn from Peking University and National Southwest Associated University in the Republic of China. The so-called "Qian Xuesen's question" means this. I don't want to talk, just because I'm not interested in the discussion of "seeing the trees but not the forest". After the party congress, a teaching work meeting was held. At dinner, I sat next to Secretary Jiang and wanted to say something. I saw a wave of middle-level cadres congratulating Secretary Jiang on his election, and his words were full of official culture. I can't say anything. I sat at the end without saying a word. In recent years, I have rarely participated in the reports of provincial leaders or school leaders. I'm not putting on airs. I really can't listen to those posturing words, and I can't sit still. During my tenure, my suggestions to schools were not targeted at the so-called "strong schools". I generally think there are several points: the policy of introducing talents should be appropriate, flexible and loose, otherwise it will be difficult to operate in vain; Conscientiously implement low-carbon energy saving, eliminate ever-burning lamps and run away; Remove the Beijing office of the school. Some people say that I am outspoken and knowledgeable about the above words and deeds, but in fact, in my heart, I just follow common sense. At present, most of the problems in domestic universities are under common sense.

In dealing with the performance and evaluation of the system, it is only for my personal convenience, but it is not appropriate. In recent years, I have never submitted an award, competed for leadership, entered the talent project, and have no level ... I have been persuaded by people, including school leaders, friends, colleagues and functional departments, who have expressed their willingness to help me fill out the form. I thank them, but I am still the same, and the reasons are simple: First, my grades are low, I can't reach them, and it's a waste of time; Secondly, I'm afraid to spend time filling out forms. I prefer to play ball games or visit the West Lake when I have time, and feel some pleasant things. Of course, I also pay tribute to the teachers who submitted awards and won them. University teachers don't need to be homogeneous, have differences, and have diverse values.

But we can't completely ignore things related to departmental work and collective interests. My discretion is to do business according to the requirements of the school and apply for degree points, disciplines, teams, quality courses and so on. , and orderly implementation, but the key is to improve the level, strengthen the strength, lay a good foundation. The result is natural, rather than quick success, relying on tackling key problems to fool people, running in the province and running in the Ministry. I never pay bribes or give gifts in this matter. At most, I mean a little service charge. Some people also suggested sending more, saying that some institutions are five times and ten times bigger than us, but I didn't accept it. My idea is: even if I can't get it, I won't cross this bottom line. I have no envy or even pity for those who achieve their goals by giving heavy gifts. I will not worry and struggle about this, and I will never kidnap my precious life in order to get and maintain such "achievements". Does a high score really mean a high level? Is this real learning? Really scientific research? In my eyes, many large projects with various names and tens of millions of funds have produced some pseudo-scientific achievements, and you can get the full prize by tackling key problems with scientific research funds. This is ruining the blood and sweat of taxpayers and ruining the style of study.

My attitude is very contradictory, and the school may also have opinions. Although I don't care whether the school leaders are satisfied or not, there is still a tangle that I can't solve in the end, that is, these evaluation indicators are linked and bound to the interests of departments and groups. For example, in the past few years, the college assessment was divided into ABCD files, and in the last two years, 120% was awarded, as well as various disciplines and bases, and corresponding funds were allocated. This is related to each teacher's personal performance and professional title. We can only try to keep up, but we can't do it well to satisfy everyone. There is only one solution: I choose to quit again and stop playing the system. In the first half of last year, Secretary Jiang asked me why I didn't want to renew my contract. I said that the current practice of higher education can't get my value and moral recognition.

If the school is not satisfied with my work, I fully understand that it is normal from the school's point of view. But I don't want to change. The best way is to hire a new dean. Teacher Gao stood out in this recruitment at home and abroad. I am glad that I can finally get rid of the contradictory situation and return to my original role in life-a casual person in Wolong.

"People say I care, but future generations should think", which is a famous saying of Wang Dao, a famous Eastern Jin Dynasty star. It means confused, confused. I admire the tolerance of the literati of the Eastern Jin Dynasty. Even in the crisis of partial security, they still resolutely believe in the metaphysics of "governing by doing nothing", consciously curb the resurgence of institutionalized Confucianism-ethics, and "support the southeast" with the cultural concept of "governing by doing nothing"

Of course, I am a nobody, but I also have a deep-rooted concept of "governing by doing nothing", and I have heard some remarks or criticisms that xu teacher does not care about management, only arranges things without supervision and inspection, and emphasizes discussion over implementation. In fact, these views are correct, and criticism is also out of responsibility for work. I appreciate it. But as the old saying goes, a leopard cannot change his spots, and a leopard cannot change his spots. I still advocate "governing by doing nothing". My belief is based on the following points:

First, fundamentally speaking, teachers are all adults, have received higher education, belong to the group that loves learning and teaching most in society, and they have enough ability to manage themselves well.

Secondly, I have been studying metaphysics since I was a student, and I was deeply influenced by it. I firmly believe that "governing by doing nothing" is the eternal value pursuit of free intellectuals, which is also the content that needs to be advocated and carried forward under the current system.

Third, there are many problems in the current management system of colleges and universities. The promotion arrangement is boring and contrary to common sense. Under the background of administrative education system, "doing nothing" is the most effective shield and antidote.

I agree with the view of "excellent courses", but we must first understand what "excellent courses" mean. There is only one standard for excellent courses: students benefit and form word of mouth. There is no fixed format. Now this set, thousands of people: courseware, homework, teaching materials, online interaction and so on. , be short of one cannot, again wonderful. By this standard, the lessons taught by Chen Yinque and Liu Wendian in Peking University in the past are not excellent. Chen Yinque only brought a cloth bag, and Liu Wendian scolded the National Government for half an hour. What should I do? Teaching emphasizes pluralism and diversity, and there is no reason to advocate a face.

It is also against the scientific spirit to engage in scientific research and strengthen the project to this extent: 1, and utilitarian factors have infiltrated from the starting point of research. The serious orientation of fame and fortune destroyed the pure heart for the purpose of Tao; 2. Look for reading materials. Reading is a heart-to-heart conversation with the wise, a metaphysical enlightenment, and a self-contained article with experience. When doing a topic, it is important to obtain the required information, and the argument is sloppy, so there is no way to accumulate learning. 3, rushing to hand in the task, ignoring the quality. It is against the law of scientific research to require half a year to complete it. But as long as the author can handle the work well, there will be a lot of rubbish; 4. Personal humiliation during the adoption and publication of the results. High-level publications are crowded, so the level is almost the same, depending on who dares to publish, and there is no personality when doing research; 5. Accounting fraud. The funds for scientific research in liberal arts are limited, so finding invoices for reimbursement has become an essential procedure.

After the interference and supplement of this series of pure scientific research, is there any room for survival of the "learning for yourself" advocated by the ancients? I am afraid that most of them are "learning from others". Research has been seriously instrumentalized and become a stepping stone to fame and fortune. How many people can get happiness and value affirmation from scientific research? Of course, there may still be some masters who have the ability to combine projects with their spiritual needs. However, this is no longer the mainstream, and the mainstream is a great interference and harm. I doubt that, under such circumstances, how many scholars can really have the ability to communicate with ancient and modern Tessa? Why can't there be a master? You don't have to ask!

In the past two years, the school's "innovative strong school" has increased by 20% every year, which is even more nonsense. Some college indicators are decomposed into people; Others use their own pockets to fill the funds; Fraud also appeared, and the results of the previous year and the following year were included in the current year, just to get the year-end award.

There are many kinds of appraisals and rankings, such as advanced teachers, scientific research pacesetters, excellent party member, league members, family members, trade union activists, democratic parties, etc. What is "15 1" is divided into several levels, this award, that award, this level and that level. There are so many excellent titles in a society with such a bad world style and such a low overall cultural level. Is it still valuable? They are all cheap goods from their own trees, and they have no meaning except disturbing the mood. Every semester, the teachers of the college should be ranked every year, and they should be divided into one, two, three, four. What's the point? This is the routine of wearing small red flowers in kindergarten, treating the teacher as a child. It makes scholars narrow-minded, strive for fame and gain, and settle accounts at the end of the year, as if they have been working for a long time for a year. In the past, the spiritual world of our humanists was mostly Socrates, Hegel, Confucius and Li Bai. Now, what we are always struggling with all year round is: how to complete or earn more evaluation points.

My attitude towards the system regulations and inevitable management contents of these schools can only be "governing by doing nothing", and teachers should treat and choose according to their own conditions. Anyway, the policies and results of individual assessment are stipulated by the school in advance, and the college only implements them. It can be said that I consciously resist the system pollution in the position of dean, dilute and subtract many things at the college level, and do nothing to strengthen and add, just to make teachers less disturbed and avoid the ridiculous or even absurd tinkering mentioned above. In fact, some obvious tossing will not last long, and the top one will pass. Such as "accelerating innovation", almost died without a disease.

I am glad that my liberal ideas have been recognized by teachers; Some teachers disagreed, and I smiled. This is just a difference in management philosophy. The essence of democracy is to respect not only the majority, but also the minority and even the individual. I never pursue so-called harmony. The reform of colleges and universities has a long way to go, and all kinds of ideas and practices can be preserved. This is the cultural ecology that universities should have.

For me, what really makes me feel a sense of accomplishment in these years is the reading club organized by some young teachers in the college spontaneously, which is outside the evaluation system. This is the right way for scholars.

The last paragraph is about my future work and life.

The title is a sentence from Rand's poem "I don't argue with anyone" translated by Jiang Yang. "I don't argue with anyone, and I don't care who I argue with. I love nature, followed by art, and my hands are simmered with the fire of life to keep warm; The fire has gone out and I'm ready to go. " Mr Jiang Yang's open-mindedness, kindness, elegance and tenacity are the most admirable, and there is no such person now. I remember when I came to the College of Literature, I also read a sentence quoted by Ibsen by Hu Shi: "Your greatest responsibility is to cast your materials into utensils." I took office with these two sentences, and I left office with these two sentences today.

My administrative duties have all been removed, and I have returned to my original role. Being a history teacher is a sacred occupation, and it is also a self-sufficient and fulfilling occupation. I will be more committed to communicating with students and telling them the truth of history. At the same time, I will not be trapped in the system as before, and more energy and attention will turn to what I like, regardless of the evaluation at school. After the completion of the two projects at hand, I may also feel alienated from the projects unless there is an opportunity that is quite consistent with my interests. At present, there are several things to consider or participate in. In fact, it took a lot of time last year.

1, pay attention to environmental protection. Recently, he gave lectures in Xinjiang, Hangzhou, Shaoxing and other places, focusing on environmental protection. The rapid development of China in the past 30 years has led to the terrible destruction of the natural environment. The whole country has become a big construction site, the ancient city has become ancient, and a large number of species have become extinct. 20 10 on September 22nd, the national aeronautics and space administration (NASA) released a digital map of global air quality detected by satellite (200 1-2006). PM2.5 less than 10 is a safe value. China's air quality is the worst in the world, especially in eastern China, where PM2.5 is over 50, approaching 80. According to the latest research by the Party of China Academy of Social Sciences, the land use in China is eight times that in Japan for every 1% increase in GDP. The unit energy consumption is also about 8 times that of Japan for a long time. Kitajima said that we have been crazy about modernization for nearly a century. The road to prosperity at the expense of land and environment is unknown to other countries. The problem is that they have taken maintaining a pure land as their primary strategic goal, and Japan has quietly become a resource-rich country. China's economic aggregate exceeds that of Japan, and it is self-righteous. In fact, it lost another move. Therefore, environmental protection in China needs more people's attention.

2. Participate in charity. I am a director of Zhejiang Charity Foundation and Zhejiang Zheng Tai Group Foundation. My main task is to advocate a low-carbon life, pay attention to food safety, and help needy groups.

3. Study and reflect on the cultural changes in the past hundred years, especially the cultural disasters and their sequelae in the left-leaning period. The sweeping of the floor, moral decay and cultural destruction experienced in the left-leaning period have not been carefully cleaned up and reflected so far. Why do people generally lose the moral bottom line? It is even worse to report less than one yuan, but turn a blind eye to the ever-burning lamp in broad daylight. On the 60th anniversary of 2009, the literary and art circles started the "spy year", which has influenced it to this day. "Latency" and "plot against" flooded the screen, and even the "Exploration and Discovery" column broadcast spy wars. Kindness and honesty in the world are no longer believed. I don't believe that not looking for a relationship will be treated fairly. Tan Sitong said that the old administration in China was fooled by thieves and homesickness. This statement is thought-provoking.

Russia has experienced a thorough cultural reflection. In the final analysis, the subversion of the former Soviet Union was a cultural failure and lost people's hearts. Today's revival also benefits from the revival of the whole culture. A few years ago, some people missed the Soviet Union. Putin said that it is a matter of conscience to say that the former Soviet Union is useless, and it is a matter of brain to restore the former Soviet Union. Therefore, it is necessary to truly restore Russian freedom of belief and thought, and let individuals live according to their own wishes to the greatest extent, not just eating and living.

The fundamental problem facing China is also the issue of cultural identity. In recent decades, the luckiest thing is to solve the problem of eating. At the same time, the most puzzling and worrying crux lies in the fact that power has expanded beyond measure in society, and the official power and civil rights are extremely unbalanced. As far as the economic field with the greatest reform is concerned, the total scale of the top 500 private enterprises is still less than the last one of the top 50 central enterprises. The social structure of governing the people by officials has not changed greatly, so it is difficult to cultivate modern citizens with rational spirit, contract consciousness and self-discipline of public morality.

Cultural reconstruction needs someone to take responsibility, not only to say, but also to do. The most gratifying thing in my life is that I have been living in my true colors for decades and come here calmly. Of course, I also have hobbies. I once confessed in my introduction: Today, with the serious loss of national excellent cultural traditions, my generation is ashamed of learning, and any honor and title have become tasteless. If I can try my best to save a little cultural fire in this life, I hope it will be enough. Plus playing basketball, playing table tennis, swimming, climbing to accompany the old, it is a happy life.

Although the road of life will not be smooth, everything will be smooth, and even great hardships will be encountered and experienced, I still sincerely believe that God is very kind to me: I have basically never been frozen and hungry in my life, and I have worked and lived in my favorite journalism and history major. Fu Cong said that God let me spend my life with music, which is enough. I am also satisfied, but I feel guilty about asking God for more than I get in return. Therefore, reverence and gratitude for nature will accompany every step of my future life.

In short, what will accompany you in the future is a more relaxed and happy xu teacher, called "Children with childlike innocence go home".