What are the intriguing details of Andhadhun?

Andhadhun, as a suspense crime movie, became a dark horse at the Indian box office on 20 18, and gained numerous praises after it was released in Chinese mainland. The story of this film is inspired by a French suspense short film of the same name on 20 10. The film tells the story of Andhadhun Adace who pretended to be blind in order to gain deeper attainments, but was tricked into becoming a "witness" in a murder case. Finally, I had to get involved in a dirty whirlpool and couldn't save myself. The plot of the film is compact, the story is ups and downs, and the plot is constantly reversed. The "brain hole" and unpredictable "wonderful plot" in the film won unanimous praise from all walks of life.

The biggest attraction of this movie is that you will never guess the ending until the last second, and you can't understand the director's intention in the gripping plot. You have to savor it after the movie to gain insight. There are many intriguing details in the film. If you chew them carefully, you will be surprised by the director's inspiration and clever handling.

Detail 1: The film echoes from beginning to end, hiding mystery.

At the beginning of the film, the blind rabbit that had been hunted by the hunter attracted the audience's attention, followed by the scene of the man playing the piano by the window, and no one could connect before and after. But it was not until the rabbit appeared at the end of the film that the audience seemed to smell the meaning. The rabbit appeared when the man told his ex-girlfriend Sophie about his experience in a foreign country. In his narrative, Simi's car must have hit him without a blind rabbit. He may have been pitied by fate and saved by a blind rabbit on his deathbed. When everyone, including Sophie, believed in this, Adace kicked a jar across the street at the last foot of the film, which was enough to shake his chin and make people re-examine what Adace said to Sophie.

If the man is blind, how did he see the jar? When they said goodbye, the waiter in the coffee shop handed them a rabbit's head cane, but the man thought he had lost it without touching it. What is the explanation? The man is blind, but when he tells his story, he clearly knows that a blind rabbit saved him and made him a protective blind stick? And how did the blind rabbit escape from the scene safely after accurately hitting a high-speed car? The director deliberately hinted to the audience with this echoing design that the man was lying to Sophie. In fact, the real ending may be that Simi was put on the plane by the hero and the doctor, and became the object of liver transplantation to save the rich. The man also took off Simi's cornea by the way, restored his vision, and fulfilled his European dream ... Or maybe the truth needs to be verified, and the dark side of human nature is still worth thinking about, but these thoughtful and frightening pictures are enough to make people tremble.

Detail 2: Neighbor children are too "witty", implying unscrupulous media.

Like Adace, the little boy lives in the government's low-rent housing. From the beginning of the film, he left the impression of being clever and naughty. He tripped Adas with a rope; Secretly saw Adace watching Sophie on the stairs; After inadvertently realizing that the man was not blind, he climbed the window to sneak a video at the first time and tried to get money by selling it to others. These too "smart" practices are not what a child should look like. The most surprising thing is that when the little boy learned that the man was poisoned by Simi, he continued to sell candid videos as if nothing had happened. At this moment, shouldn't even a child call the police or ask for help first? A child who gets help from the government and enjoys social welfare has no sympathy for the blind and disabled, but uses it to attack. Isn't this implying that the unscrupulous media, in order to gain the public's attention, got in the way, ignored the truth, wandered about rumors and paralyzed the audience? They never care about the truth, and just groundless gossip is enough to divert public attention and even achieve the effect of subverting public opinion.

There are some subtle details in the film that are even more thought-provoking. Sophie had long suspected that Adas pretended to be blind and caught him in bed with Simi. Why did she continue to believe his lies after two years? The man witnessed Simi's two murders with his own eyes, but he ate the tribute she handed him without hesitation, which led to his blindness. How do you explain this? At the end of the film, does the tree that looks like a liver on the way that the man and the doctor are driving indicate the real ending? Does the ingenious pen in the film Shiva express the author's ultimate questioning about who is good and who is evil? These intriguing details are destined to be a classic suspense film with ups and downs. It is no exaggeration to say that every character in this film is full and vivid, in which the confrontation between faith and betrayal, the interweaving of good and evil, hesitation and resolute killing are all vividly reflected. This excellent film has left the audience with endless aftertaste and thinking, which is its priceless place.