The author of "The Emperor's New Clothes" wrote that old ministers, officials and emperors all went to see the cloth, but the writing was different. Please tell me the difference.

It is written that the emperor and his cronies inspected the swindlers' weaving three times, repeatedly exposed their ugly acts of self-deception for their own interests, and portrayed their ugly and ridiculous faces. If only one of them is written, it is not enough to expose the corruption of the whole court. But the three scenes are similar, and it is really difficult to write one by one. The author is good at accurately grasping the identity and age characteristics of the characters, fully mobilizing the language art, and writing three scenes similar but different, so that the plot can be fully developed. Old ministers and officials have different attitudes and actions in inspecting weaving. Surprised, the veteran first "opened his eyes wide", then praised him for "seeing carefully through glasses" and finally "listening attentively so that he can recite it when he returns to the emperor". As for the official, he just "looked and looked" and took no further action. Psychological description is different. Both the old minister and the emperor were surprised, but writing the old minister in imperative sentences expressed his regret and lament; When writing about the emperor, interrogative sentences are often used to express surprise and doubt. All three denied that they were stupid and incompetent, but their writing style also changed: the old minister thought he was superior and the emperor thought he was supreme, and they all used negative rhetorical questions. Officials are young and successful, so they have a little self-doubt, so they use a question: "Maybe I don't deserve such a good office?" The language descriptions of these three people also have their own characteristics, with more or less words, concreteness and generalization, which are different. Especially the old minister's language, he not only praised it again and again, but also promised to report it to the emperor. "In fact," he did recite the words of the liar. All these show the hypocrisy and self-deception of the old minister, and also reproduce his panic mentality at that time. Generally speaking, the old minister writes more carefully than the "honest" official behind him. Because he is the first person to "see" the cloth, it is related to whether the scam can go on, so the author uses more pen and ink to describe it. The description of these two ministers is to expose the emperor. They are in the position of setting off and contrasting. In essence, the misinformation of ministers added a layer of vanity to the emperor: ministers can still see, how can I turn a blind eye? It can be seen that the emperor was not only taken in by swindlers, but also cheated by ministers. Telling lies, deceiving each other and following others' advice are bad habits in that society. If my answer is helpful to you, please click the "Take Answer" button below and send us a small red flower to encourage you! Wish you a happy life! thank you