Are there monsters in Lake Baikal?

After watching CCTV's investigation on China monster, people were not relieved, but fell into endless confusion.

After several days of programs, we followed the reporter's investigation, not only heard the accounts of witnesses, but also saw the images drawn by many parties, even the videos at that time. Although the evidence is not enough to prove the existence of the monster, it still makes people feel that the monster is by no means groundless. But then, the rectification process of these evidences made people feel a little unsatisfactory. When these phenomena have not been convincingly explained, the host concluded that there can be no water monsters. In fact, there are still many places where there is suspense. For example, in the narrow Kanas Lake, there are so many hucho fish more than ten meters long. How is its food chain solved? What creatures do those huge flippers on the water photographed by Tianchi belong to? Wait a minute. It is obviously difficult to convince the public to rush to such a conclusion before these problems are clarified.

From an expert's point of view, they hold a negative attitude towards the existence of various water monsters. Their theoretical basis is: first, with the development of science and technology today, it is impossible to find large creatures; Second, animals like dinosaurs died out 65 million years ago, and now there can be no remains; Third, the reproduction of species needs a certain scale of groups; Fourth, there must be a food chain that conforms to the current level of understanding. We can't deny the scientific nature of the above theories, but they can only be said to be relative to the universality of things. In fact, everything has not only the characteristics of universality and inevitability, but also the characteristics of particularity and contingency. It is not a scientific attitude to deny the existence of particularity and contingency. The contingency of things is an unconventional form of expression, so it is often difficult to solve it from the perspective of universality and inevitability of things. From our daily life to the whole nature, there are countless such examples.

Now we might as well study those theories carefully. Let's put the first two together. As for dinosaurs, they died out 65 million years ago. It should be said that under normal circumstances, no one can come to the conclusion that there is not even a remains at present. At present, scientific and technological means are still weak in many cases, at least the vast ocean is a world that human beings have not fully understood. It is reported that in the middle of last century, a Japanese fishing boat fished up the body of a huge marine life in New Zealand waters. Although it was quickly thrown back into the sea, a crew member had painted and photographed it before. Scientists have identified this creature as similar to the plesiosaur, which is considered extinct. Let's talk about the problem that the reproduction of species needs a group of a certain size. In 1930s, fishermen caught a fish unknown to all fishermen in the Indian Ocean near the coast of Africa. Later it was identified as barracuda by French biologists. This species, which belongs to the hollow stickleback, was originally thought to have been extinct as early as the Cretaceous, and its extinction age was almost the same as that of dinosaurs. I didn't expect to find it after nearly 100 million years, which really surprised the scientific community. Because the fish had rotted at that time, in order to find the living body for further research, scientists immediately distributed advertisements along the coast of Africa to collect the living body of the fish in the form of rewards. However, the second such fish was caught after 14 years. It can be seen that the number of this kind of fish is small. But it doesn't seem to affect its existence. In addition, the Shennongjia expedition once found a small group of golden monkeys with only a few dozen in Shennongjia. There are no other groups around for hundreds of miles, but these golden monkeys are still alive and well. We also need to talk about the food chain. In fact, there is no need to give other examples of this problem. Take the giant hucho fish in Kanas Lake as an example. Now their existence is beyond doubt. However, in such a small Kanas Lake, those big guys may swallow the fish in the lake with a big belly, not to mention that there are not many big fish in the lake for them to eat. But how do they live?

From a global perspective, there is a puzzling problem. Whether it's Loch Ness in Britain or Lake Baikal in Russia, or even Tianchi in China, all the monsters you see are like plesiosaurs! Is it that people from so many different countries secretly unify their rhetoric to deceive the world? And since you are a fool, do something else. Why are you holding on to plesiosaur? There are so many witnesses to strange phenomena, without exception, they are all fabricated for different purposes or have fantasies for various reasons. We can't help but ask, is this possible?

According to the results of this survey, although it has not been identified as a water monster, it has become an indisputable fact that there are abnormal hucho fish in Kanas Lake. It is necessary for us to see how this conclusion was reached. First, the authoritative team led by Xinjiang Fisheries Research Institute found that there were more than ten meters of Dahongyu in the lake. When I went down the mountain, I happened to meet Yuan, an expert in Kanas Lake. When Yuan heard that they saw a dozen meters of Dahongyu in the lake, the first reaction was impossible! But after all, the other party is the authority in this field, so he went up the mountain along the track. As a result, he also saw these strange big rubies. Two experts think things will be much simpler. Therefore, these big red fish were named Hucho, and became popular. Even so, aquatic experts in Heilongjiang raised questions. According to scientific calculations, the maximum length of the Kanas Lake Hucho salmon will not exceed 4 meters. To verify this, experts came to Kanas Lake, not far from Wan Li, to cast nets for fishing. As a result, I didn't even see the shadow of the big fish. The biggest Hucho caught was only over one meter long. This situation is worse than his original estimate. Things have come to this, and the previous conclusions could have been rightfully overturned. But unfortunately, the former is not an ordinary person, but also an expert in this field, so things seem a bit tricky. It's like two evenly matched heavyweight boxers meeting unexpectedly in the arena. In the eyes of the audience, it was originally a scientific wrestling full of suspense, but it ended in nothing.

Now, let's go back and analyze it. If the person who first saw Dahongyu was not an authority figure, but a mountain dweller or an ordinary tourist, what would researcher Yuan think? I'm afraid that apart from shaking my head, I also feel sad for the low level of knowledge of China people from the bottom of my heart. Generally, I don't take it seriously, let alone have the idea of going to the mountains at once. Then, a hard-won opportunity to uncover the secret of Kanas Lake will be missed.

After all, experts are a small group, and it is impossible to expect them to discover various phenomena in person. But now the problem seems to have entered a strange circle-many strange phenomena are often not discovered by experts, and all phenomena that are not seen by experts themselves and cannot be explained by current scientific and technological means are immediately completely denied!

Becquerel, the representative of British subjective idealism, once said: Being is being perceived. This sentence is most suitable for some of our experts. All kinds of strange phenomena can be counted even if they are perceived by thousands of people. Some unusual phenomena often seem to be contrary to common sense. Ordinary people naturally cannot tell the truth, and it is natural for experts to deny it. Once it is directly perceived by experts, the situation will be very different. Even if the experts themselves can't explain it, they will never deny it easily. Isn't it a truth that the  salmon in Kanas Lake has been determined to be about the size of the world's largest animal, the blue whale?

The most unacceptable part of China monster investigation should be lake hunting. Three people waited on the mountain for seven days, and photographed the precious video material of the huge whirlpool, while the expert sat in the office and sent it away in a few words. Listening to the expert's description, a situation appeared in front of us: a small ice cube fell into Lieta Lake and floated leisurely in the middle of the lake one or two hundred meters away from the shore, and suddenly a group of fish swam in. These stupid fish use ice cubes as food to fight for it. It is no exaggeration to say that they are stupid. This is a perennial resident of Hunting Tower Lake. It should be common for the lake to fall into the ice, but they still regard an ice block that has long been commonplace as food, and the more they grab it, the more fierce it is, so that a big vortex is finally formed. Isn't this a slippery record? However, even so, there is still a problem in front of experts, that is, to form such a big vortex through competition, the fish must be big enough, but I have not heard of any big fish in Lieta Lake. Of course, such a problem can't beat experts. Experts immediately speculated that there might be a bigger fish in the lake, called schizothorax fish. According to experts, as long as there is this kind of fish, the problem will be solved. Needless to say, experts also estimate that the surface of the hunting lake may sometimes produce a powerful whirlwind, which sucks water into the high water column and makes people mistakenly think it is a creature like a dragon.

God, I really don't know if this is scientific research or fantasy! A lake like Lake Lita, which is in a low temperature area all the year round, is in a high mountain range and has a narrow lake surface, often produces such strong air convection? People with a little brains should also have doubts. Not to mention whether there is the kind of fish that experts say in Huntingta Lake, it is also unknown. But none of this can affect their categorical denial of the witness.

Seeing this makes people bite the bullet and can't stand it. Fortunately, the investigation has come to an end.

Whenever I see the earnest stories of those pious witnesses on the screen, I cannot help feeling sorry for them. At that time, they didn't know that the evaluation they got after telling the story was either nonsense, exaggerated facts, dazzling and illusory, and misjudged because of ignorance. Some of them have low educational level, but there are also many cadres. I can't understand how people from different levels and regions can make the same mistake.

After reading the survey, I had the idea that if I found something similar, I wouldn't say anything in front of the camera. A lesson from the past is a waste of water. As for scientific discoveries, let the experts take their time.

This article is quoted from: