Who has a good place to keep a diary online?

！ ! Those teachers who have no quality and morality make so many people kill teachers all over the world with a stick, which makes these teachers feel wronged.

In order to save education, we should really consider the treatment of teachers, especially rural teachers, so as to avoid unreasonable charges in so many schools, so as to prevent so many capable teachers and excellent teachers from changing careers and job-hopping, so as to prevent so many teachers at school from distracting themselves from taking part-time jobs, taking teaching work as a backup of pension funds, perfunctory work and making extra money. I have a friend, Housing Authority, who revealed that among the buyers of commercial housing in our city, teachers account for a pitiful proportion. I also know a lot of teachers, among whom, except their parents or lovers have extra financial strength to support them, other teachers are really poor, and even some teachers are so poor that they don't care about eating elephants and face when they see big ginseng or free ginseng. I am speechless when I see such teachers.

The word "salvation" seems to be a bit serious. No matter how bad our motherland is, it won't be said that it will fall in a few decades. However, education is indeed a very important issue. If I remember correctly, Japan seems to be the country that has invested the most in education. Look, people's science and technology are so developed. (I'm not ignorant of national humiliation, I hate Japan, but I can't deny some advantages of others.). "Save" ha, I still use this word to say:

To save our teachers (one of saving education), on the one hand, we should improve the treatment of teachers; On the one hand, we should raise the standards of recruiting teachers and evaluating teachers; On the one hand, we should care about the teacher's voice, and the teacher is under great pressure. The whole society is asking for teachers, isn't it? On the one hand, it is necessary to reduce the workload of teachers. As far as I know, the workload of teachers in the 2 s has doubled compared with that of teachers in the 198 s (please revise it if you don't know the national situation accurately). If you don't speak well, please ask someone to add it.

To save our education, I borrowed someone else's post to answer: You will know what to save after reading it, but remind everyone that we people can't save it just by talking about it.,,,,,,

Respondent: red2k level: novice (25-11-18 14:43:58) Current education in China. The proportion of public education funds to GDP in developed countries is above 5% or even 7%, while in China, it was 3.19% in 21 and 3.41% in 22, which failed to reach the national goal of 4% in 2. If we look at the per capita public education expenditure, it will be even worse. Sweden is more than $2,, the United States, Japan, Germany and France are between $1, and $1,5, and China is only $9.4 (according to the 23 New Year Special Issue of Southern Weekend). China accounts for 1% of the world's education funds, but it has to educate 25% of the world's students. It is a pity that the money is not enough. It is a pity that this money has not been used in the compulsory education that the government should take responsibility for, but mostly used in the higher education that should rely on social forces. The ratio of education funds for primary school students, middle school students and college students in China is 1: 1: 23, while that in the United States is 1: 3: 2. (According to "Development Economics" edited by Liu Wei and Wei Jie, China Development Press) At present, 92% of China's public education funds are spent on higher education! However, this is only a limited 8% of the funds, and it is often still not enough for schools. In some areas, especially poverty-stricken areas, national education funds are often regarded as an important income of local finance and used for other purposes. In addition, due to institutional reasons, the Ministry of Education is not directly responsible for school finance, which leads to unreasonable government decrees and lax management ... < P > Unfair education is also a prominent problem in China. Some local governments artificially create an education gap, invest heavily in key schools, key middle schools, and even build star-rated schools, making them places for the children of the rich and powerful to attend school and sources of government finance. When you go to a good middle school, you can often go to a good university. The key universities in China, especially the first-class universities, mainly serve the powerful groups. According to the research on the equity of higher education in China led by Professor Yang Dongping, the proportion of rural students in Peking University dropped from 18.5% in 1998 to 16.3% in 1999, and that in Tsinghua dropped from 2.7% in 1998 to 17.6% in 2. For popular majors, the children of management cadres and technical classes account for 57.3%, while the children of workers, farmers and laid-off workers only account for 25.4%. In 23, the scores of the college entrance examination of a university in Beijing were 38.8 points higher than those of cadres and intellectuals on average, and the children of laid-off workers were 35 points higher than those of cadres and intellectuals on average. At present, children of disadvantaged groups mostly enter non-key colleges and universities and unpopular majors that no one wants to study. Education in China has played the role of a separator-with the government's financial resources, key primary schools, middle schools and universities will be built for the children of the strong groups to enter the study, while most of the children of the weak groups will miss it, and the social division will become more and more serious ... < P > Education in China attaches the most importance to intellectual education, students in China have the heaviest burden, teachers in China are the most tired, and parents in China love children the most. However, China has not yet cultivated its own Nobel Prize winner, the wealth created by 1.3 billion people in China. Moral education, which has always been ranked first, is actually weak, and juvenile delinquency cases once accounted for more than 7% of criminal cases; Physical education, which is juxtaposed with moral education and intellectual education, is weak. Teenagers in China are physically weaker than those in developed countries, and the myopia rate ranks first in the world. Aesthetic education and labor education are even less valued; The weakness of rural education, vocational education and family education seriously restricts the overall and all-round improvement of China's national quality and the emergence of a large number of talents in all fields.

Respondent: freshrainbow Level: Novice (25-11-11 23:1:17) 1. China has a large population. There are too many students and too few teachers. There are 5-9 students in one classroom in Australia, and 5-8 students in one classroom in China.

2. The state has invested too little in education. A teacher has a team of dozens of students. Only a few schools have microphones and speakers in every classroom, while most school teachers only offer voices, and even lose their voices seriously.

3. The state has invested too little in education. So how many students can't find a job, why not be a teacher? Some people think that their income is too low, while others want to be teachers. However, the Education Bureau and government policies control personnel too tightly and refuse to let them in. Why? < P >? They can afford so many corrupt officials, but they can't afford so few teachers, let alone more teachers.

4. The state invests too little in education. Textbooks have come alive, but the teaching conditions in public schools are still so dead. How can a classroom be "alive" with dozens of students in total darkness? How can a teacher prepare lessons or write them in a notebook, which is more efficient than preparing lessons with a computer? The teaching aid is still a blackboard and a piece of chalk. How can it be as vivid as the multimedia images of the classrooms in a few schools?

5. Because there are too few teachers and too many students, the weekly class hours of teachers have soared, about 2, with an average of 4 classes a day.

It's like fighting a war.

6. Maybe it's because teachers' income is too meager in the face of today's consumption level, or maybe it's because some teachers' personal qualities are

corrupted, which has caused the teachers' dedication to work to be reduced or very low.

7. There are some differences in teachers' intelligence, teachers' own teaching skills and teachers' professional level. It is the same as students' intelligence and autonomous learning ability, and it is the same as people in society.

8. The overall quality of the people is generally deviated. In addition to teachers, citizens also include parents in families and people in society. People's first teachers are parents, and parents are lifelong teachers. The social group is also the teacher of all students, and their teaching method is called imperceptible influence.

Respondent: sszhyg Level: Senior (25-11-12 9:16:2) Another point is: in recent years, with the expansion of colleges and universities, all the students who failed to reach the admission mark have gone to college, and the quality decline is inevitable. On the contrary, due to the low salary of teachers, good students have been admitted to popular majors. Teachers only take students with poor quality, which.