Talk about a person who is stupid enough to cry.

I stayed up all night because I was thinking about a problem, and then I lost sleep. After reading and thinking, I was fast and slow. I didn't sleep until 8 o'clock in the morning and just woke up.

I didn't sleep because a sense of terror filled my heart.

The thing is this: Before going to bed, when I got up from my desk and left, I glanced at three stacks of books on my desk. Each stack contained nearly 18 books, which formed a book wall and surrounded my study space.

There is an advantage to putting books on the table. You can pick up a book and read it, so that you can quickly know whether a book is worth reading. I have always been proud of this, because my understanding is ok, so it is still very efficient to look it up. Am I good?

At the moment I got up and left the study, metacognition suddenly started. It tells me that whatever you are proud of, there must be contempt, arrogance, ignorance and weakness. I actually think, "Is it amazing?" Then, the appearance of this pride will inevitably explain a problem: my standards are too low, my platform is too weak, and my opponents are too poor.

At this time, I was so sleepy that I suddenly woke up. I thought about it, how long have I been immersed in this state? It may have been two or three years ... I'll go. I don't even need to think about it. What a terrible thing it is!

Pulling back the half leg that stepped out of the study, I quickly sat down, took out a pen and paper, and opened my brain to reflect on what had happened.

First of all, what is the purpose of learning?

The purpose of learning is definitely not to show off or crush others. My purpose is to encapsulate my own value and form use value, so as to contribute to large-scale collaborative networks, especially those dominated by strangers. Since the purpose is clear, there is a problem of means. How can we study better? There are several assumptions:

Well, looking at myself under these assumptions, my purpose is not wrong. What is wrong is that my methods and tools are completely in disrepair and I haven't updated the system for two or three years.

So what have I been doing all these years? I am afraid again, and the whole knowledge system is in a state of chaos. The input terminal is poorly managed, the system terminal is free at will, and the output terminal is blind and confident, deceiving itself and others. Fortunately, no one came to crush me, which actually kept me alive ... (damn, no, I wouldn't have done this if I had crushed me earlier)

Thought of here, I can basically sort out the shortcomings:

The problem is found. What is the reason? Meditate for a moment, there are four questions:

First, the continuation of the original question. Since the second half of 20 15, the problem of blind expansion and accumulation has gradually emerged, and I have invested in the solution of "continuing to expand and deal with problems" at the low level. With the continuous implementation of the plan of drinking poison to quench thirst, all my time has been consumed, and I have no mind to think about the accumulation problem, so I can only fight with the original accumulation. This problem has been solved since the end of 20 16, and it is not until today that it is the turn to update the learning system.

Second, blind self-confidence and pride. The construction of new thinking began in March this year. Under the leadership of teacher Cheng Jia, my whole cognitive level has reached a big step. My thinking mode has changed from stock mode to incremental mode, and it will become clearer and simpler to look at the original problem. Therefore, when solving users' problems and troubles, I became more and more familiar, so I unconsciously formed such a powerful illusion. However, my comparison standard is wrong. I should compare it with people who also catch up with incremental thinking. How to compare? Stupid, the more stupid, the more self-righteous, and fall back into the inefficiency of competing with the original stocks.

Third, lack of enemies and challenges. Regarding the understanding of self-management, I am in an awkward position: first of all, there are not many people studying in this field, because people with self-management systems have created value; Secondly, the level of learners is not necessarily higher than mine; Third, people who speak higher-dimensional systems don't have so much time to talk to me. Therefore, there is no tiger in the mountain, and the monkey is called the king. I actually lost my sense of risk.

Finally, the new thinking has not solidified. My incremental thinking mode is still in a state to be consolidated. I don't always use decision-making principles to make judgments and decisions. I still use the system 1 to give a solution through a shortcut. Then, this prejudice will inevitably lead me to the old road.

In Seeing Growing Yourself, it is specifically mentioned that if you want to write your own questions, others can watch your jokes, which has several advantages: first, you can exercise psychological resilience, and second, you can really solidify your growing mental model. I think, in the final analysis, we can find the most critical reason: arrogance and self-righteousness are caused by low level.

Ah ah, I don't want to be so proud!

The problem has been found and the solution is not difficult. According to all the above learning assumptions, I just need to rebuild the information system and make it work. There are several points:

This matter can be done in 3-5 hours, and I will try to complete the reconstruction of the whole system before the end of the month.

As it happens, the self-management system is also upgrading. As the key part of the whole system, information management and knowledge management can be reconstructed.

Well, it's worthwhile to admit your mistake early! However, I am so sleepy ~ I'm going to bed.

Today, I wanted to write about how the self-management system was upgraded to the personal operating system, but since I pressed the upgrade button, the progress of the upgrade is out of my control. Well, it's also a good thing. It still takes some time for such an important comprehensive revision, and patience is good.

The upgrade of this system is not an ordinary tinkering, but comes from a comprehensive update of cognition and simplification of methods. What really corresponds is the comprehensive rationalization of the logic behind it, and the system is really packaged into a black box. I just need to enjoy the benefits of black box input and output.

Yesterday, I explained the content of the paradigm to you in the transformation observation group, and copied the case here:

You must have that kind of experience with the example. Let me give you an example:

If stock growth is adopted, several basic paradigms must be followed: 1. Do more. Otherwise, there is no short-term gain; 2. Keep up with the joneses. You must not fall behind others; 3. Short-sighted. Don't believe in the possibility of long-term returns.

If incremental growth is adopted, several basic paradigms must be followed: 1. Think more. Think about your own value and deduce the logic of obtaining value; 2. Oppose mediocrity. Any public strategy must be resolutely resisted. We will adopt the easiest way to achieve our goal, but you are doomed to be mediocre. 3. Take a long view. You take advantage of future nonlinear inflation to make huge profits.

You see, what is the value of paradigm change? Can you understand it?

Today is the first 12 day of the experiment. What you see is my stupidity. Then my question comes: "Why do you think you are stupid?" Do you feel stupid? If so, what is it? Have you changed yourself since then? What does stupidity have to do with transition? "Today's message label is # observe Yongcheng for 50 days-12 days #, come on.