After someone cuts you, put down the knife and stop attacking. Do you have the right to hit him? Is it illegal to hit him?

The other person cut you once and suddenly stopped cutting, and you are not a worm in his stomach. How to judge whether the other party will put down the knife and won't cut you again? If he picks up a knife and cuts you again, can you reason with him?

Any ordinary person who is cut with a knife is not in a state of extreme panic and tension, and will definitely try his best to fight back until he is sure that the other person no longer threatens your life. Therefore, all off-site speculation is just an armchair strategist. The fact is that once the other party cuts people with a knife, the hacked person will either be killed or fight back to protect himself. As for each other's lives, we can only rely on luck.

Someone cut you, then put down the knife and stopped doing it. You have no right to hit him. Is it illegal to hit him?

If this assumption is certain, then call the police. If I can still beat him, it must be someone on our side who can control him and eliminate the danger. At this time, there is no defense against him, but revenge for the injury, which is of course illegal. Self-defense refers to stopping the ongoing illegal infringement.

But if someone cuts you and then puts down the knife, who can be sure that he is not cutting you? At this time, you can either run or pick up the knife. If he threatens you again, he will cut it with a knife. This is self-defense.

Do you want me to talk about law or morality?

If we talk about the law, the people who comment below will definitely scold me again. After all, a yard is worth a yard

Let's keep morality. No, I can't stand on the moral high ground. Therefore, this is irresponsible and a hypocrite.

Let's start with the reason. Reason means, since I have the ability to hit him after he cut me, why can't I hit him before I get hurt? Why can't I beat him in a fight Do we have to wait until someone surrenders? Besides, I was so stupid that he surrendered.

I'm just saying, the topic doesn't exist. After all, I am a weak woman, I will not be killed, and I can't have a backhand chance.

This question feels that many people are taking the rhythm. Of course, it is easy to be a keyboard man, so it is irresponsible to speak.

Back to the problem itself, the logic of the problem itself is wrong. Self-defense is to stop violent crimes, not revenge. First of all, your starting point should be correct.

Secondly, self-defense is in the process of crime, not after the crime stops. This is also the basis for judging whether to stop the crime or retaliate afterwards.

Of course, things are rarely black and white. Is putting down the knife the end of the crime? There is no way to generalize this, which is also the keyboard player's favorite place.

Criminals chop you, put down the knife and pick it up. ...

Then obviously, putting down the knife halfway is definitely not the end of the crime. But this situation is obviously an imaginary situation!

Obviously, the process of suspicion should be that the criminal cuts you (or has the intention to cut you), puts down the knife, and is knocked down (or cut down). ) by you, and there will be no follow-up process. If there is a later process, obviously, you must have defended yourself.

So, is it self-defense for you to knock down (cut down, etc.)? )? This is a concrete analysis of specific problems according to local conditions. It can only be said that in the past, most courts ruled that defense was excessive. In recent years, we have gradually begun to judge self-defense, such as the famous case of Yu Hai.

Finally, as long as you don't think this is revenge, but stop it, don't worry so much, take action.

It is a wrong concept not to say that a crime is illegal or no longer committed, because it is impossible to judge whether a crime is committed only after the fact.

We can use reduction to absurdity. If putting down the knife is not killing people, how can it be considered as killing people? Does it count to pick up a knife?

If you pick up the knife, then herdsman will say that he didn't mean to hurt you.

Does it count if you stab me with a knife? Maybe it was just to scare you, and it changed halfway.

Only stabbing you is a crime, and pulling out the knife is the end.

Oh, my God.

In my opinion, as long as you hold a knife in front of you and hurt people, you should judge that it will hurt people according to the law of inertia until you change its inertia by means (hitting him).

Put down the knife if you cut it, and you won't commit any more crimes. If you are absolutely sure that you won't commit another crime, you can't take a knife and kill him. You can only control him with a knife and call the police to arrest him. There is no other way, unless you break the law, you won't kill the man who laid down his weapon on the battlefield. If the knife falls, and he doesn't take the initiative to put it down, and he doesn't intend to admit his mistake and surrender, you have the right to pick up the knife and cut him, because the killing has not stopped. This is called ego-this is called crossing the line. It was a few knives that crossed the line and hurt your life. You should be convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to less than seven years. If you are seriously injured and not dead, you can take care of yourself. If you have been victimized for less than three years, the key is to look at the degree of injury caused by several knives after being subdued by you. Before being subdued, you were in self-defense and innocent of killing. After being subdued, you must never start work, or you will cross the line.

Forget the law! Watch me chop me, or I'll chop you to death! There is no third option unless you go into space. As long as you are where I am, you must die at my hands!

You're right. This is the loophole in our self-defense clause. The crime stopped. If the other party cuts you and it's not fatal, then he stops cutting, and then he stops infringing. If you fight back at this time, it is likely to be characterized as excessive defense. Very sad.

Someone cut a policeman with a knife. Stop it. Do the police close their eyes to enjoy it or resist it with a gun or stop it by force before cutting it! Self-defense is to stop people who are in danger or life-threatening in time or in advance under the premise of danger or life-threatening! People are different from robots. It doesn't matter if the robot is shot and hacked by criminals or thugs! People are different, they will die! When someone cuts you, you have no resistance! If he cuts one knife, there will be a second knife. He won't stop until he cuts your knife! I used to be in Guangdong. At that time, Guangdong was very chaotic. There are gang fights, robberies, rapes and so on every day! I have never seen anyone run away with a knife! Never seen a robbery, grab half and run! I haven't seen a rapist take off his clothes and run away! When the robbers saw that you had no money, they gave you a knife! Someone hit you! Defense is a way to defeat the enemy! What should I do if I have no strength to fight? Then work hard. There will be a lot of actions here that can't be done at once!

The law should only protect justice, and the people have the right to kill criminals and see who dares to commit crimes.