How to evaluate the disaster film, the catastrophe from heaven?

Catastrophe from Heaven is also called Global Storm.

if it's a cinema to see special effects, it's worth the ticket price.

However, if we get down to it, it's a bit more true. If we appreciate and comment from the category that movies belong to art, we need to say the following three things.

(1): Taking both into account and pursuing cool are often counterproductive and useless!

According to the definition of the film branch, Global Storm is more like a science fiction film or a disaster film. But it must not be the slang we often say: the best science fiction film in disaster films, or the best disaster film in science fiction films.

the most embarrassing result is that both sides are neglected and some attributes are unclear.

About the disaster:

The description of the disaster lens could have been the biggest attraction of this film, but it has become a slot because it has its own shape.

from a logical point of view, if extreme weather occurs because human beings destroy the natural environment, should the root cause be the improvement of the earth's environment? It is true that the earth's environment also includes the atmosphere as we know it.

But only relying on the satellite network covering the whole world to transmit radio waves or signals to guide and interfere with the atmosphere can control earthquakes, tsunamis, thunderstorms, ice and snow, extreme cold and extreme heat of the whole earth. Even like a fantasy, it comes and goes? A hundred-foot wave has flooded your throat. Do you want to retreat? Have you considered the feeling of huge waves?

let's not talk about how to flexibly control the use of disasters.

another question, does everything have to be contrary to common sense, which is the best embodiment of disaster?

don't you notice that there is a tsunami in the desert and ice blowing in the tropics.

what's more, there is no rain and lightning, and there is no wind and fury.

The earth has become a toy in children's hands, which can be kneaded at will. This kind of disaster caused by not playing cards according to common sense is more like a farce, which is not profound and painless.

As for the problems in the field of science fiction, every step on the space station is actually a BUG. However, the film's self-proclaimed theme is the nature of disaster, which is also a little self-aware.

(2) When in Rome, do as the Romans do, and take care of the native land, but it has passed by. What do you want to do?

Most people are attracted by the Oriental Pearl Tower that stands under the lightning in the movie poster. The towering spire, together with the creaking lightning, makes people look forward to it.

I'm expecting and fearing that there will be a loud bang and it will burst in China. It's a pity that after watching the whole movie, there was no accident. Except China and Hongkong, where guns were lying frequently, other cities were unscathed.

It seems that there are not many American disaster movie who brazenly dare to take China as a pillar city. Fortunately?

At the beginning of another movie, there is a line: "Scientists from 17 countries, led by China and the United States".

I am extremely proud that a global giant like Warner Pictures has to take care of the China market.

China's hegemonic and leading position is getting stronger and stronger, but apart from chenglong, the chief scientist in the Pacific region who lives in Hongkong, we never see any China people again.

Maybe people in China are all living Lei Feng, so they brushed off their clothes and hid their achievements and fame.

(3) Respect nature and protect the environment. It's not a disaster, just say fight back.

At the beginning of the movie, it is said that due to the relentless destruction of tsunami, hail and storm on the earth, human beings unite and start to fight back!

This is my most critical and offensive sentence, especially in many American imperialists' movies, which have taken pains to explain this truth: "Man can conquer nature" and "the great American people are omnipotent". Moreover, it is often anti-customer-oriented. Obviously, it is human destruction first, and finally it is said that nature is destroying human survival homes.

and you said you would fight back? Is it really good that this word is used in this way? Let's assume that there really is such a day. Isn't the word "redemption" more appropriate?

If 1/2 points are meant to highlight the special effects of the plot and create an atmosphere, I'll just choose to believe and recognize them.

But from the point of view that a person living on the earth and caring for the environment is everyone's responsibility, point 3 is extremely irresponsible.

preaching the omnipotence of human beings and transmitting the invincible nature is actually equivalent to planting a seed in the heart of the audience, and this kind of "blind arrogance" seed may sprout. I was chanting in my heart: "If you play badly, you can still fix it. If you really can't fix it, fight back, abuse it, and just have a meal?"

I'm not being serious, but I'm spitting for the sake of spitting.

the only thing in the world that can completely change the direction of mankind is not science and technology, but education.

At this moment, with the development of mobile terminals, the influence of movies is not weaker than that of textbooks we are familiar with.