1. How many times did Ochumelov repeatedly change the sentence in handling the dog bite incident? How are they judged? 2. What is the basis for Ochumelov’s constant changes? 3

①He was sentenced six times

The first time: I don’t know who the owner of the dog is.

Judgment: If the dog is killed, the owner of the dog will be fined.

The second time: Some people said that this seemed to be General Sigalov’s dog.

Judgment: The dog is innocent, and Khryukin is blackmailed.

The third time: The patrolman said it was not the general’s dog.

Judgment: Dogs are despicable creatures. Khryukin suffered harm and must teach the owner of the dog a lesson.

The fourth time: The patrolman said it might be the general’s dog.

Judgment: Dogs are delicate animals, and Khryugin was reprimanded.

The fifth time: The general’s chef said there was no such dog.

The verdict: "Wild Dog" "killed".

The sixth time: The chef said this was the general’s brother’s dog.

Judgment: The puppy was "strangely clever" and Khryukin was insulted.

②Varies depending on the owner of the dog.

③What does not change is the nature, which is to act according to the wind, flatter the superiors and bully the subordinates, and follow the trend.