Is taking a baby at home for a long time to accompany or gnaw at the performance of the elderly?

This depends on the specific situation, whether to accompany the elderly or eat the elderly, in fact, it is related to the living conditions and actual living conditions of the elderly. As for the economy, it is difficult for a family to distinguish so clearly. Being with old people is a good thing. After all, young people are busy at work now, and it is not easy to accompany the elderly. If you are willing to live with the elderly, it is obviously a good thing, but only if you need financial resources, instead of letting the elderly support the family expenses without working. If you have no financial resources, it's like eating and drinking with your children at your parents' house. Family conditions are good, parents have retired, and you have enough savings and pensions to easily support the daily expenses of the whole family. Family ties are more important than money, and they will welcome you together very much. Old people are most afraid of loneliness. Of course, the company of children and grandchildren is a rare asset in their later years. However, if they don't have a stable source of income and want to work hard to earn money to support their families, it is too much for you to take your children there to eat and drink, which is obviously shameless.

Another point is to see if parents need your company. Some elderly people will plan their own lives, dance square dances, visit parks and morning markets, and so on. They have a very healthy and positive attitude. It's not good for you to take care of children and occupy their free time. This is not companionship. Although it is not to be old-fashioned, it is not recommended after all.

Let's analyze the specific situation. I think young people, or their own children, can occasionally ask the elderly to help take care of them. They will be happy, but staying with their parents for a long time will become a burden.