Joke Collection Website - Mood Talk - Halfway through the game, I felt as if I had no chess. By the way, give me some skills in the game. Thank you.

Halfway through the game, I felt as if I had no chess. By the way, give me some skills in the game. Thank you.

Let me say it briefly. I'm just a small company commander.

First of all, there is no good or bad layout, only good or bad. For example, the teacher in the first row, behind a bomb, a stick can not kill. This is not good. You still earn a little when the other party eats 40, and you don't lose money when you eat 39. But you have to know that this 3800 layout is not mobile, and it is difficult to cooperate with the opposite family. The bomb is exposed too early, which does more harm than good and can be used occasionally.

Second, I can't use 40 well either. I have to control the panel after the opening exposure, and then get it done early, so as not to be scared back and forth by real and fake bombs. If it's not exposed, put it on the street and wait for the big talk from your family, and eat a big one (which can help you block the bomb at home). Don't move until you know it. Be eaten up. You know, the biggest loss of military chess is being eaten by a son who is just one level older than you (not being bombed at the age of 40). You can study the usage of each sub yourself, but you won't be able to say it for a while. You can also watch the tutorial.

Finally, the most important thing is cooperation. You may think that you don't play chess because you don't know how to cooperate. The difference between a master and a low hand lies in whether you can cooperate, block the way, pay attention to your eyes when playing chess, have the opportunity to block and help your family block big chess. In short, military chess is the same thing as you two, don't just think about yourself. If you play too much, cooperation will become a natural thing, and you can advance and retreat freely. By the way, this is the most direct way to improve your skills after playing chess. It's best to look at only one player, analyze what went wrong, and then comprehensively see how four players did it.

That's all. I hope it helps you.