The virus is raging! Tokyo Olympic Games faces three helpless choices! What is the difference?

2020 is destined to be an extraordinary year. At the beginning of the year, the global virus epidemic has caused a major blow to the global economy and finance, and the most affected is the quadrennial Olympic Games. The venue of this Olympic Games is Tokyo, Japan. The Olympic Games was originally a grand event of human sports, but under the ravages of the virus, people are not allowed to hold such gatherings, otherwise it will be a hotbed of the virus.

Faced with such a grim situation, the Japanese Olympic Committee is also actively trying to solve it. After all, the investment in an Olympic Games is huge. If it can't be held successfully, it will be a huge loss both economically and in reputation. In addition, the Tokyo Olympic Games is approaching, and various measures are already being implemented. For example, the construction of some sports venues is coming to an end, and hotels around the venues have signed lease agreements to entertain athletes from all over the world. The virus is so rampant that the Tokyo Olympic Games faces three helpless choices. The following are three choices of my personal opinion:

1, cancel

There is no doubt that the loss is huge. The Tokyo Olympics was cancelled once because of World War II. If it is cancelled again, Tokyo, Japan will be regarded as an unknown city, and it will be more difficult to hold it again in the future, because it represents the bankruptcy of credibility.

2, there is no audience.

This way is undoubtedly a helpless move to deal with the virus, but at the same time, athletes will also be at risk of being infected, and referees and volunteers will cooperate. The number of participants will not be small, which can be said to be an adventurous attempt, but the loss to Tokyo is also huge. Without the huge passenger flow of the Olympic Games, it will not drive the local economic development.

Step 3 extend

This is a wise method. Although postponing the competition will also cause losses, compared with the epidemic situation, it is undoubtedly the best protection for the audience and athletes, and it can make up for the losses in other ways.

What do you think of these three options? Welcome to leave a message for discussion.