Which film camera is recommended for portraits?

What are some useful film cameras and which ones can you recommend to novices?

Minolta X700, Canon AE-1, Nikon FM2, Olympus OM-1, Minolta X700, are the fighters among entry-level film machines. Born in 1982, it is probably older than all the comrades who play with film today. It is cost-effective and very suitable for working people and students, but it is by no means a low-end machine.

What are your recommendations for entry-level film cameras?

Canon EOSRebel2000 is a 35mm film camera and is one of the best film cameras for beginners. It has autofocus and allows full manual control. It is also useful for those who have basic film camera knowledge but would like to advance their knowledge further.

Canon is arguably the best 35mm film camera for beginners because it also has a built-in 35-zone exposure system. This results in fewer lens corrections for you. Additionally, it offers 11 shooting modes, 7-stage autofocus, and high-speed sync mode for faster uploads.

Canon AE-135mm film camera is the best 35mm film camera. This is a single-lens reflex camera with automatic exposure monitoring and focal plane shutter for precise shooting. All lenses are compatible with any lens in Canon's FD series and also feature the ability to couple to that specific device, making it a great companion camera for still photos.

It comes with a Canon BreechLock mount and is compatible with Canon FL and R lenses. The camera uses a pentaprism to fix the viewer, allowing for over 90% accuracy and reflection in image capture, which is high for any camera. It has stop hands and an aperture scale for viewing information.

Pentax K1000 Manual Focus Film Camera

Pentax is one of the best film cameras for beginners. It uses 35mm film to produce high-resolution photos in the K1000SLR feature. It comes with simple controls for shutter speed, aperture, and focus. The Pentax is a simple camera.

The old master talks about Nikon Sharp, Canon Flex, and Pentax oil. For portrait photography, which one do you prefer?

I don’t think I can reach the level of an old mage, but I still have a lot of insights into portrait photography.

Nikon’s sharpness, Canon’s softness, and Pentax’s oiliness have become a style of the camera brand itself. Of course, everyone has their own preferences for radish and green vegetables. Especially between Nikon and Canon, there has always been a debate over which brand of camera is more suitable for portrait photography.

The SLR I use now is Canon, but the earliest masterpieces I saw with SLR were shot by Nikon. At that time, a college classmate bought a Nikon SLR. I don’t remember the specific model. The first thing I felt about the portrait photos I took was how they could be so clear. It was so clear that no hair could be seen after zooming in. At that time, everyone was still joking that no matter how beautiful a person is, flaws can still appear in photos.

In fact, SLRs were still considered emerging digital products at that time. People’s pursuit of them was mainly high pixels, so Nikon’s sharpness was a plus for itself.

However, when I bought a SLR, because it was a second-hand SLR that my colleagues had discarded and the price was very good, I had no choice but to use the Canon 60D and began to appreciate Canon's soft interpretation of portraits. In fact, Canon's marketing and promotion are also dominated by portraits, and the style of the film is more suitable for the tone of studio portraits, making it easier to win the audience's welcome. The feeling of Nikon portrait films is closer to realism.

As for Pentax's oil, my understanding is a color interpretation, just like I like Fuji's colors. The "greasy" feeling of Pentax films should be said to be a kind of taste and texture. This kind of texture is generally not liked by girls who like Japanese, forest, and light styles, and it probably belongs to a niche taste. I think when Pentax shoots Tibetan portraits, the feeling of the film should be more in line with the taste, kindness and vicissitudes of life.

So, which brand of SLR camera you prefer for portraits depends on the photographer’s own preferred style for portraits. If your style is changeable, innovative and experimental, you might as well try SLRs from various brands.

Please clarify the allusion first before asking the editor. It looks really embarrassing to make up an incomprehensible sentence

The correct legend is: "Canon is charming, Nikon is sharp, and Pantex is annoying." drunk.

”

Among them, “Pentax” is the transliteration of Pentax, and it is also the name given to “Pentax” by the older generation of photographers.

This allusion originated from the film era and summarizes Canon’s , Nikon, and Pentax lens characteristics.

Times have changed, and today Pentax is half dead, with a market share of less than 2%, and a large number of lenses are manufactured by Tamron. Let’s take this outdated “joke” again. There is no point in trying to flatter pentax.

There are still people who boast that "Olympus" is the "Leica of the East", you believe me

Old mage, after all. It's old, after all, it has an old perspective from the film era.

It is undeniable that there are certain subtle differences between lenses of the same level but different brands. Different lens materials and different coating processes determine the color. There will be differences.

In the old optical design theory, a lens with high contrast must have poor details (for example, old Nikon lenses tend to have high contrast), and a lens with low contrast must have excellent details (such as Canon FD lenses). Tend to high details); lens design is to balance contrast and detail.

However, after entering the 1990s, the use of simulation design in optical design became very popular. Therefore, lens convergence is a major trend in the world. Including the coatings that we often say have a decisive impact on color, they are all simulated in advance in the design software. You can get whatever coating you want, including temperature changes. The spectral range and these can all be simulated. The lens has not yet been made. In addition to knowing the imaging performance of the lens, the software can even help you calculate the approximate weight and even cost analysis of the lens in the future.

Now, Canon and Pentax do not necessarily lack the high contrast of Nikon, and Nikon does not necessarily lack the details of Canon.

Because the original solutions used by everyone are similar, the remaining factors that determine the difference in lens description ability have become more and more important. Less and less.

Let me tell you my own experience. I have used Nikon, Canon, Pentax and Sony cameras. In the beginning, I used a Nikon D90 with a kit lens, no matter where I went. I shot them all with the D90. Later, I discovered that Nikon cameras are really sharp. Later, I started using the 70D and 6D, and gradually fell in love with the warm tones of Canon. Then I accidentally bought the 6D and bought the Sony A7R2. . As expected, it is produced by Sony, and the photos and videos it takes are actually sharper than those of Nikon. But then I thought about shooting more portraits, and bought the 5D4, which is the dream of most photographers.

With such a camera, each brand has its own characteristics. In fact, the current photo retouching technology is so mature, and your own photo retouching ability will not affect the shooting of the camera much, just before the final product is produced. Just to give you some feelings.

But then again, I personally like Canon’s softness and Sony’s variety of fun.

Canon is good at marketing. , technically inferior to Nikon. The clarity captured by Canon is not enough, it seems to be covered with a layer of haze, so it looks soft. The resolution captured by Nikon is very high, so it looks sharp. Canon spends money on advertising and marketing, and Nikon spends money on specializing in technology.

I use all three brands, Pentax is my favorite.

I used Hasselblad and Mamiya medium format in the early days. In the digital era, I started using 135 format. Naturally, I used Nikon at first for more than 10 years. Later, I used Canon for 7 years because I liked to produce films directly. Then I switched to Sony mirrorless camera for its portability and ease of focusing.

The following is Canon

Florence, Italy

Milan, Italy

4/3 is also a good choice. Olympus is also my favorite. Em10 is always with me. Look at its direct film effect.

2019 shooting in Nha Trang, Vietnam

The only one that stays with me most often is Olympus

In 2020, I added a Sony mirrorless camera due to work needs. Sony has another style. The most outstanding thing about Sony's focusing system is that it rarely makes mistakes. Basically you can shoot with confidence.

Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge

I wish all my friends a satisfactory work

This question itself is wrong. The original words are: Nikon sharp, Canon charming, Pantex is intoxicating.

The so-called Pantex is now Pentax. The main point is that Nikon is very sharp and has high contrast, so many people say it is suitable for landscapes; Canon is really flattering when shooting portraits, especially yellow people. As for Pentax, it is the most German among the Japanese models, especially for its green performance. When it comes to the development of current equipment, Pentax is indeed lagging behind, but it cannot deny Pentax's historical contribution and profound skills in optics. Just like Minolta, it has not even retained its brand for a long time, but it has also left behind many classics. Pentax's new 720 lenses and Star Wizard in the past two years are no worse than any Nikon and Canon lenses of the same focal length. The biggest difference between Pentax and Pentax is in focusing. The control is very good and the image quality is good. The new Star Wizard is the first star head with electric aperture. Pentax lags behind because it cannot give up on the original bayonet. It is not like Canon who dares to put it down and puts it down. It always moves forward with a heavy load. I hope Pentax can stand up and return to the front line this time!

Canon is unwilling to make progress and is preparing to change its profession

I don’t dare to be an old mage, so let me tell you from my experience! Canon is still the first choice for shooting portraits, both in picture color and image quality. After controlling the wedding dress, it can be taken directly. This picture was taken with 5D3 + Sigma 851.4

Should I shoot portraits with Nikon or Canon?

Question 1: Is it better to shoot portraits or landscapes with a Canon SLR? By the way, let me introduce Nikon. Canon and Nikon are both excellent, but they have different focuses. Canon is fast and has obvious advantages over Nikon in the telephoto field. This depends on the fact that Canon has a larger body diameter than Nikon, and has greater potential to develop large-aperture lenses, which is more convenient and cost-effective. Even cheaper, Canon already has 1200mm super focus, while Nikon has developed it to 600mm, and the effect is not as good as Canon 600mm. In terms of wide angle, Nikon has a slight advantage. The imaging sharpness is better than Canon. In terms of color tone, Canon Accurate and naturally warm, Nikon is cold and rich, so use Canon for portraits and Nikon for landscapes. Canon exchanges sharpness for gradation, and Nikon exchanges gradation for sharpness. Each has its own emphasis. Because Canon is fast, so Sports reporters generally use Canon, which is the white cannon you see on the side of sports fields. However, Canon's low-end products can be said to be cheaper, but they are not as kind as Nikon, especially when it comes to lenses. Dogs, on the other hand, Nikon is a bit more kind. That is to say, Nikon's dog head is acceptable, but the body is not much better. It can be said that low-end Nikon is better, and high-end Canon is better. It all depends on you. If you choose, if you want to play with film, I will tell you without hesitation: use Nikon! If you ask about digital SLR, I will say: they are comparable, and it is more cost-effective to use Nikon for entry-level. After all, SLR is about lenses. I am speaking from Canon, am I fairly objective?

Tell me your budget, and I will recommend it for you. My recommendation is not based on the parameters provided online, but based on my experience. If you have never touched it before, don’t comment!< /p>

Question 2: When shooting landscapes and portraits, Canon or SLR, Nikon or Canon? In Nikon’s territory, the answer is of course Nikon hungry

However, when it comes to portraits, Canon’s high-end ones are really good~

85mmf1.2L is a good thing that Nikon does not have~

Recommendation is Nikon d9018-105 kit+50mmf/1.8D

Or, Canon 40D17-85 kit+ 50mmf/1.8II

Question 3: Is Canon or Nikon better for shooting portraits? Canon and Nikon are not better than each other. Canon is softer and Nikon is sharper, but Nikon's skin will be rougher if the film is taken out directly. But after the later stages, it will be fine. And sharp photos have a better feel.

Which is better, full frame or half frame. Obviously, full frame is better. The good thing is that many people will tell you that the picture quality is better, but many people understand that the better picture quality is determined by the hardware of the camera. In fact, the advantage of full frame lies in the same framing. For example, if I take a half-length photo, under large aperture conditions, the image quality of full frame is better, because for example, a 50mm, 1.8 aperture lens, a half-frame Canon is 80mm, f1.8 , Nikon's is 75mm, 1.8. From the perspective of depth of field, the full-frame one is better. These can be calculated. That is to say, full frame can better utilize the performance of the lens than half frame, especially under large aperture conditions. Therefore, if the original poster has money, he recommends buying full-frame.

As for the camera, any full-frame one will do. Canon recommends 60d for half-frame, and Nikon recommends d7000 or d7100.

Canon's 60d half-frame is the most cost-effective. Compared with the 550d, 600d, 650d, and 700d, the viewfinder of the 60d is a five-sided mirror, and the other four are five-sided mirrors. The official standard battery of the 60d is 1800 mAh, and others are like 1200. The 60d also has a window that displays ISO, shutter, etc., but the others do not. Of course, the processors of 650d and 700d are 5th generation, and the others are 4th generation. But the biggest role of the processor is speed, and speed is reflected in continuous shooting and video. However, if you don’t use it to shoot at the stadium, it is unwise to use a SLR to shoot videos, so the processor is of little significance. The 70d is an upgrade from the 60d, that is, the 18 million pixels are upgraded to 22 million, and the processor is upgraded from the 4th generation to the 5th generation, so it is of little significance, but the price is much more expensive. As for Nikon, the d90 and Canon 60d have the same configuration, but the 12 million pixels always feel a bit low, so I recommend its upgraded model d7000 or d7100. If you want to know more, Canon 60d and Nikon d90 are the two best-selling SLRs. , there is a reason for it, and it was the success of these two machines that made Kodak, Fuji, Samsung, and Olympus withdraw from the arena. As for the lens, it is recommended to buy whichever is cheaper, because you will find out later that the 18-55, 55-250, 17-85, 18-135, 18-105, 18-200 lenses, whether Nikon or Canon, are just Some cameras can't take the photos you want. They are far inferior to the 600's fast 50mmf1.8 fixed focus lens. The so-called one-lens lens means that it has a wide zoom range, not that it has good image quality.

So in photography, technology comes first, lenses second, and cameras third (such as cards, mirrorless SLRs, SLRs and full-frame SLRs). The structure itself determines that under large aperture conditions, the same viewfinder, all The half-frame mirrorless card camera is reflected in the sharpness and background requirements, which also make the photo image cleaner. But these are all the results of the lens, so the lens has a greater effect than the camera)

Question 4: Is it better to shoot people and night scenes with a Nikon or Canon SLR? You make a D3. Absolutely awesome. Or D300 or Fuji S5. Canon 5D is too old.

D80 and 450D both stand on one side. Don’t think that Canon’s noise suppression is good. After using it, you will know that Canon's noise reduction comes at the expense of details. Personally, I feel that it is better to reduce noise in software and use Canon JPEG files, even ISO100 films. Noise reduction has been done. So it looks like there is less noise. Not really. The characteristic of Nikon is that there is relatively little in-camera processing. So Nikon's films don't look as clean as Canon's films straight out. In fact, this is done to preserve details. Even if you shoot with D80. Just use NEF. I’ll do it later with NX. Absolutely beautiful.

Currently except Nikon D3. Any machine with an ISO higher than 1600 is basically useless.

Question 5: Is Canon camera better for taking portraits? Or Nikon? Both are big brands and can be used for portraits.

But Canon has the EF85mmF1.2L ultra-large aperture portrait head. Nikon's 85mm lens has a maximum aperture of only F1.4. In addition, the skin of the characters photographed by Canon is extremely red, which is more beautiful. But now I don’t care if I adjust the color of digital photos.

In short, both are very good, but more people use Canon to shoot portraits.

Question 6: Is Canon really better for taking portraits than Nikon? Why are actually quite suitable? What matters is what lens you use and who takes the photo. Even if there is a difference, it is not a big difference for people who are not experts

Question 7: Is it better to shoot people with Canon or Nikon? In the past, there were Canon portraits and Nikon landscapes, but now the newly launched SLRs are better in color. There is basically no big difference, and the Nikon shoots portraits very well.

Question 8: Which one is better, Nikon or Canon? Which one is more suitable for photographing people? It depends on what aspect you consider. Nikon's films are sharp, highly restored, and can reflect the theme objectively. The Canon films are softer and more intense. Obviously if you want to express people, use Nikon. If you want to take more artistic photos, then use Canon. Of course, the actual difference between the two brands is often difficult for us to observe.

2011

Question 9: Is Canon really better for taking portraits than Nikon? The first reason is that the color style shot by Canon is more suitable for people's skin color, and the second reason is that there is no "stupid sharpness" that photographers call Nikon. In fact, there is no equipment that is suitable or not. The key is whether the person can take pictures

Question 10: Which one is better, Canon 70d or Nikon d7100, for portraits? The 70D is out of focus and the D7100 is not good at color.

The 70D video recording function is powerful, but the photo focus is not realistic and the imaging is loose. The D7100 does not have a low-pass filter, and the sharpness of the photo is inferior to that of the 70D.

70D amateur, D7100 professional.

70D has a large plastic case, and D7100 has a large area of ??metal.

The 70D has 19-point full cross-focus, the focus accuracy for taking pictures is very average, and it can achieve automatic focus for video recording, which is fast and accurate.

D7100, 51-point AF focus, the same focus component as the D800, two levels higher than the 70D, but it cannot achieve autofocus for video recording.

The 70D has a wifi module, which can transfer photos to the phone in real time, but the D7100 does not have a wifi module.

The 70D has a touch screen, which is easy to use and newbies can learn quickly. The D7100 does not have a touch screen, so it is not easy to get started, but once you are familiar with it, you will find that the operation is obviously more scientific and the ergonomics are better than the Canon machine.

The 70D has better skin tone performance in portraits, but its tolerance is low. D7100 color is suitable for shooting any subject except portraits. If you are proficient in PS, ignore it.

70D + mid- to low-end Canon lenses = garbage. 70D + Niutou = cannot take advantage of all the advantages of full-frame lenses

D7100 + Nikon mid-to-low-end lenses = good image quality. D7100 + Niutou = cannot take advantage of all the advantages of full frame.

Canon has the richest lens group, but there is a big difference in imaging between high, medium and low-end, and the workmanship quality is uneven. Typically, it costs 3 cents for 10 yuan.

Nikon's lens lineup is not as rich as Canon's, but the workmanship quality is relatively uniform, the mid-range and low-end lenses are kind, and the image quality is good from low-end to high-end.

If you are just playing, I suggest you choose 70D. If you want to work hard to improve your level and study hard, please choose D7100.

If you use a lot of Canon products, please choose the 70D. If you use a lot of Nikon products, please choose the D7100.

Personally, I feel that the overall quality of D7100 is higher than that of 70D, and the difference between the two is consistent with the actual selling price. (The premise is that they are all licensed prices)

I am a supporter of both Canon and Nikon, and I do it purely by hand. I hope it will be of some help to you!

Recommended cameras for taking portraits

Recommended cameras for taking portraits are as follows:

1. Canon EOS5DMarkIV

Its autofocus tracking and Autofocus Face Detection ensures you get the sharpest images possible in still portraits and action shots, and even if you miss focus by a few millimeters, Dual Pixel RAW technology allows you to shift focus in post-processing. For example, if your eyelashes are sharper than your eyes, you can make a few adjustments and voila! _The eyes look sharp. Another benefit of Dual Pixel RAW technology is the ability to adjust the bokeh in the background for a more pleasing effect.

2. Canon 6D Mark II

If you’re looking to upgrade to a full-frame camera but aren’t ready to upgrade to a professional model, the Canon 6D Mark II is the perfect entry-level digital for portrait photography SLR camera. It has a high-quality 26-megapixel sensor and good noise performance at higher ISO values, even if it's not on the same level as the top cameras on the market today.

3. Canon EOS90D

The sensor is 32.5MP, which has a higher resolution than the full-frame 6DMarkII recommended above (although the sensor is smaller, this fact is better in sensitivity) , there are a series of differences in terms of dynamic range, etc.). The cropped sensor keeps this model in the prosumer or enthusiast category, but that doesn't mean it's not a great camera. For certain types of portraits - couples or family sessions, for example - you can definitely do a professional job.

4. Canon EOSR5

If you are a professional looking to adopt mirrorless technology, the Canon EOSR5 is a good choice, assuming you can afford the price.

The EOS R5 is equipped with a 45-megapixel full-frame sensor and is designed for professional photography (if you are looking for an amateur version, you should check out the powerful EOS R6).

5. Nikon D850

For action shooting, you can get up to 7fps continuous shooting. The D850 also features focus peaking (manual focus only), which allows you to identify the sharpest areas of a picture by displaying color overlays. If you prefer autofocus to manual focus, you'll love the 153-point autofocus system.

Ten film camera recommendations suitable for beginners

Although there are very few people who play with film cameras other than to show off, it is still recommended for equipment, and it is for the benefit of others. Based on public psychology, I recommend ten film cameras with the following specifications based on my own preferences for equipment. They are basically aimed at new film users and film beginners.

135FilmMFSLR

NikonFA

Originally I was going to recommend NikonFE-2, but I thought of a model that has been ignored by domestic Doubanjiao fans. Nikon FA. Later, I went to Xobao to look around. NikonFA was cheaper than NikonFE-2, so I decided to recommend NikonFA.

The difference between Nikon FA and MF film cameras of the same period is that it is equipped with Nikon's partitioned metering system (AutomaticMultiPatt-ern). This system is also the matrix metering system that Nikon later continuously upgraded on digital cameras. Initial version. Needless to say, the advantages of zoned metering over center-weighted metering are that Nikon originally wanted to design this system on the FE-2 body, but due to time constraints, this system was eventually used on the FA, and the FE-2 still A 60/40 center-weighted metering system is used.

NikonFA already has four ASMP exposure modes that are very common on digital cameras. If you have experience in using digital cameras, NikonFA has no difficulty except manual focusing.

NikonFA has a flash sync speed of 1/250 seconds, a maximum shutter speed of 1/4000 seconds, and a honeycomb titanium curtain. If there is anything unpleasant about NikonFA, it should be that its silver top cover is not made of metal. The FM-2 and FE-2 of the same period had all-metal bodies.

OlympusOM-2

This is an anti-Douban machine, a work that Olympus stole from Takamagahara, although I prefer OM-3 or OM- 4. But for beginners, it is right not to be polluted by various metaphysics first, but to get a good camera first. In terms of appearance, the OM-2 has a compact body and exquisite appearance. The sunken pentaprism design makes it look very compact.

This is a body that also has aperture priority automatic program exposure, and the OM-2 also has OTF metering function. The shutter speed is up to 1/1000 second, and ±2 stops of exposure compensation adjustment are provided during program exposure.

135FilmAFSLR

NikonF100

If you feel tired after using a digital camera for too long, but feel that MF film is a bit cumbersome, you may wish to try NikonF100. This is a film body whose performance is almost the same as that of Nikon's early digital cameras. It has five-point autofocus, a mature and accurate metering system, and fast and reliable automatic film advance. You can completely use the F100 as a Nikon digital camera.

Except for the fact that the latest E-type lenses cannot be used on the F100, all Nikon D and G lenses can be inserted into the F100's body very smoothly, and the autofocus and metering are perfect. The F4S is optional after the F100, but I don’t think it looks very good, and the buttons on the F4S in the post-film era look very cumbersome, not simple, and not elegant. There are F5 and F6 options above F100, but F5 does not have a focus red dot, and F6 is too elegant and expensive, and is not an artifact that beginners can control.

EOS-1V

The EOS-1V and Nikon F6 are the two heroes of the film-ending era. If you include Minolta’s a7, they should be one of the three heroes. The reason for recommending the EOS-1V is very simple: it has accurate focus and a reliable body. If you are a Canon digital camera user, you can plug in the EF lens and it will work. Its performance in all aspects is much better than the F100 that I recommend for Nikon users. Although it is not cheap, it is definitely not expensive. If you get a handle, you can definitely try it out. The feeling brought by the 1-digit model.

135FilmMFRF

MinoltaCLE

This is the product of the honeymoon period between Leica and Minolta. Leica has launched the CL version, and Minolta has launched the CLE version. Generally speaking, There is no difference in performance between the two bodies. The biggest difference lies in appearance and price. For beginner users, if you want a rangefinder film camera that is compact but delicate, has powerful but gentle film transfer, a firm but quiet shutter, and a wide and bright viewfinder, the most cost-effective choice is the Minolta CL-E. Sell CLE It is almost the incident that I deplore the most and regret it endlessly. Being able to buy such a body for 2,000 yuan is a godsend.

CLE can use all Leica M-mount lenses. Regardless of Leica, Voigtlander or L39 adapter, there is no big problem. The only annoying thing is that the frame lines of CLE are 28mm, 40mm, and 90mm. The chosen lens lacks two very commonly used focal lengths, 35mm and 50mm. In addition to Minolta's matching 28mm and 40mm lenses, you can also choose Voigtlander's VM40mmF1.4. If you don’t care about framing, there’s no problem if you plug in a 35mm lens and shoot, right? You already use a rangefinder, so why do you care about framing!

135FilmAFRF

CONTAXG1

After thinking about it, the rangefinder film with autofocus is the CONTAXG1 that is the most cost-effective. The investment of about 1,000 yuan in the camera body is still very worthwhile. CONTAXG1 is a very classic body launched by Kyocera, and the subsequent upgraded version G2 swept across the country. The G1 supports autofocus, which is certainly not TTL. The shutter speed can reach up to 1/2000 second, and the shutter is electronically controlled vertically. It supports automatic exposure, TTL metering, and center-weighted metering is fairly accurate. The camera body can automatically read the DX code of the film and automatically identify the ISO degree of the film. Although the viewfinder of the G1 is a real-image viewfinder, it is too small. This is one of the few shortcomings of the G1. The G1 uses two CR2 batteries, which are relatively easy to buy and are available on JD.com.

120FilmMFTLR

BronicaETRSi

Probably the most cost-effective 120 film SLR available in China.

Of course, Bronica's equipment is famous for its excellent cost performance, and ETRSi is undoubtedly the one with the best cost performance. ETRSi is the later mature version of this series. If you have the energy to distinguish it carefully, other ETR models are also worth buying. As a modular system, ETRSi can replace the back, focusing screen, viewfinder, and has an amazing variety of accessories. Although the PE series lenses are not cheap, their resolution and bokeh are still above the standard. For entry-level users, this system is worth getting into. With the front, rear, left, and right, you can basically play it to the limit. As for buying a second-hand Hasselblad 500C and pairing it with a single lens, just for the sake of buying Hasselblad 500C. For Su Biao, this system is more fun, more practical and cheaper. The disadvantage is that the appearance is not Hasselblad-like and cannot be pretentious.

Oh, by the way, it also supports 135 width.

YASHICA Mat124G

I don’t know if the YASHICA 124G is considered a national double-lens reflex camera. In short, this is the most popular double-lens reflex camera in China besides Rollei. This dual mirror is positioned as a popular product. It is very cheap and uses a lot of plastic parts, but overall it is still very reliable. Serious mechanical and optical failures are rare. Yashica 124G uses a very classic 75mmF3.5 Tiansai lens with 4 elements in 3 groups. The overall optical quality is good, with high central resolution and weak edges. This camera sells much better than Seagull. It is sold in department stores in small counties. Therefore, there are a lot of 124G cameras handed down, so it is not difficult to find a good quality one.

Of course, after a camera becomes popular, even if it is second-hand, the price will fluctuate. If you can’t find a 124G at a suitable price, I recommend Rolleiflex. It’s in the early 2000s and it’s still fun.

Pentax67

The 120 SLR, which foreigners call "MONSTER", is very expensive to buy, but it is very cost-effective. It is not a big problem to buy one camera and one lens in the early 3000s. If you want to enjoy it cheaply 6×7 large format, that’s the Pentax 67. Overall, the Pentax 67 is like a large 135, except for serious machine vibration, there are not many shortcomings. The sound of the huge reflector falling and lifting up feels like a cannon being fired. No matter what subject you are shooting, no matter how many people participate in the group shooting, as long as you hold the Pentax 67, release