I don't want to talk about it

I don't want to say, it's not a song, but I can steal some lyrics secretly.

I don't want to say that I am very kind, too kind, which has become the taste of others. I hope you can understand my feelings. No matter what season you have passed and what road you want to take, let yourself experience it slowly.

I don't want to say that I am pure, and I do everything with a purpose. I should protect my feelings. Although I can't refuse a lot of love, I won't give it casually.

I can't live without you. The world here refers to various platforms. Without a platform, we have no chance to show it, so we all have a feeling that we hope the platform will become more and more attractive.

The same day, the same face, the same truth, the world can not live without us, the whole world is useless without us, so the world should treat us gently.

In the online world, your tenderness and my temperature are all transmitted by words, and the results are displayed by data.

We are all workers, we all have our own "one acre and three points", and we all have equal opportunities to operate well, so "I am the master of my site".

Since you want to gain something from running a business, don't be embarrassed to say it. However, the definition of harvest is different. Today, I feel quite good because I read Jane's article and have my own article. Of course, total assets, daily ranking, ranking, buying members, drilling (shellfish), topic of submission, number of fans, reading volume, comment volume and praise volume will all become eternal topics, even surpassing the initial intention of writing articles.

Total assets, I think my total assets are actually very small, but the ranking of total assets is more than 6 thousand. If I hadn't sent Bei to Jianyou, this ranking would still be above, which is beyond my comprehension. I haven't been here for five months, and I "brazenly" said that I was still a novice in building a village. Doesn't that mean there are many people? What about the people who settled in Jane Village before me? Have all your assets been realized or have many of them not been written in the village under construction? A place without vitality and vigor can hardly have the hope of sustainable development!

In the list of Japanese watches, I only ranked 128 watches, but the ranking is 1907, which shows that there are not many watches ahead of me. I once told Jane that this ranking is actually like a queue in life. People in front will always be in front unless they leave, so it can only show that people in front insist that the number of people working in the day shift is decreasing, or even less. For me, the day shift just proves that I will be too busy to write this day, and it has no other meaning except to get a badge.

Ranking is to list all kinds of people or articles on the list. Whether it is worthy of attention depends on everyone's interest. What does it matter to you to see who has a high income? I'm not going to see it anyway. Read a good article? This cannot be ruled out, but there must be articles that make you feel more comfortable than ordinary simple friends. I read many articles, and then I made this list. I'd rather read it like this than go to the list.

Buying a member, I said last year that I only spend traffic here without spending money, and I didn't intend to take Uncle Jane's lucky money. At the beginning of this month, I heard that shells can be used to buy members, but I just received enough shells from the director, so I bought them. After buying it, I just don't have to think of myself as a "migrant worker". For this poor vanity, I will still consider continuing then. As for whether it is cost-effective, we should have known at that time. If Bay can't buy a member then, I will make myself a "migrant worker".

Drilling (shellfish), I once told Jane that if I want to leave here one day, I will give all the shellfish to Jane, but this kind of thing is probably difficult to do. It takes thirteen weeks to convert the borehole into shellfish. This hole is a bit big and tightly tied. These days, I often see some simple friends talking about how to improve the harvest of drilling shellfish, and some even say something similar to the optimal investment portfolio, saying how to control their praise to get the highest income, which is very good for doing business or investing in financial management. Every article of mine doesn't have much practice. I know why this happens, but it is impossible to change it. Consider it low quality. Compared with some articles that drill high, I think it should be written like this.

I used to think that I wrote all the articles, and it was only a matter of a few mouse clicks, so I also voted for it myself, and I also encouraged Jane to vote for what had already been written. One of the functions of the income topic is that there is an ornament below the article, which doesn't look very shabby; Another opportunity that may be estimated to be seen too much, why use "estimated possibility" to describe it, because I hardly read articles through special topics; Another is to get more favorable comments from high-level people, but the chances of so many special articles getting favorable comments are not random. Therefore, my later articles rarely contribute, so I might as well put an ornament in my own topic. If you have time in the future, gradually remove the articles that have been included, and don't occupy the "space" of the topic. It is best to cut the gordian knot for the reward items. Don't let so many problems drag on for so long without a concrete result. If you can't meet the requirements, explain as soon as possible. People at least know where they are wrong, just as it is hard for students not to know their grades in exams. The result without result is the worst result.

The number of fans is a meaningless number. I occasionally find that this number will be more or less, but generally I don't care. In theory, more people pay attention to you, so it is possible that more people will read your article, but in fact it is not.

Reading volume refers to how many people have opened the article. As for whether to read or not, only those who have opened it know, so it is more appropriate to change "reading volume" to "opening volume". Some Jane friends are worried about their low reading and have no motivation to write on. This seems all right, but the amount of reading has no effect on income, and some will attract curious people. I have to take a look at such a high reading volume, and then it's gone.

The amount of comments is the number of messages in the comment area of the article, which I care about. Articles are written after we have enough time to think, and comments are written after reading articles, which can better reflect a person's intelligence. Although some people like chatting, there is nothing wrong with it. Can we talk if we are unhappy? So I often read Jane's articles and comments, and I have repeatedly advised Jane to read the comments below my articles, which are really much more exciting than my articles. It can be said that these comments and interactions are the reasons why I insist on writing every day. Praising your article doesn't necessarily mean reading it. If you can comment on your article without reading it, it is definitely a god. Of course, I also leave comments on many Jane's articles every day!

The amount of praise is definitely what everyone cares about most, because the exercise of the article is the accumulation of praise. There is no limit to the number of times a person can comment on Jane's friends. Write as much as you want in a day, but praise can be limited. Now, whether I like my article or not, I control the consumption of 50 likes every 24 hours. Appreciating support is different from praising. This is direct delivery. I have received praises, and I have praised them, that is, I want to give affirmation when I see a lot of feelings or only 50 praises. Under normal circumstances, I would praise Jane's article. The platform does not recommend mutual praise, but I can't let people who like me praise others. I don't have to worry about simple friends who are familiar with frequent interactions. What matters is the comments and praise after reading the article; For the friends of Xin Jian, I will pay attention to whether I like it after reading the article (not necessarily accurate). For those who like it without reading the article, I will not praise it, and those who like to praise it will generally comment; Occasionally, Jane's special person (commonly known as Gao Quan) friends come to praise me. I don't usually reply. It's not that I'm rude, but that my praise is meaningless to powerful people. I might as well give it to other friends of Jane who need encouragement more. Because of the limitation of praise, I can't give praise to every Jane friend. I said a long time ago that it seems difficult to replenish energy with effective reading time. Some people suggest giving praise to powerful people every day in exchange for praise and increasing income. If * * * is really formed, it will definitely be a disaster, and it will only focus on these people's articles, while those who really want to write articles will only be given a cold shoulder. The end result is that there will be fewer and fewer people every day, leaving only those who want to drill. I told Jane not to praise many of my articles on the same day, which was really a waste of praise. It is better to leave the superfluous praise to other simple friends. For some simple friends who don't post every day, I would rather read one article a day for several months than many articles a day.

I haven't written this article for a long time. I didn't want to say it at first, but I thought Jiancun was developing in a good direction, so I wrote it. Maybe many of them are wrong!