"I personally think", are these words necessary?

I personally know the group of teachers, and I have been to Normal University myself, because many of my classmates are teachers, which is even more shocking than I expected. This kind of plagiarism in China academic circles is also amazing, including some famous figures and plagiarism.

This teacher is good, and it is really great to have the courage to point out these practical problems face to face.

In fact, we can see the social orientation from the style of writing by reading some popular articles. For example, the style of writing in the Tang Dynasty actually represents a direction. Li Shimin, Emperor Taizong, is a new generation. He was not only superior in martial arts, but also excellent in literary quality, which played a great role in the development of the early Tang Dynasty. One is his political stance, and the other is his literary thought and creation. Emperor Taizong advocated getting rid of flashy style and advocating pragmatic spirit.

This is a baton, fish begins to stink at the head. This ethos also reflects the will of leaders. Of course, I believe that under the correct guidance, our atmosphere will get better and better.

Netizen a:

There is no way to solve the problem of academic fraud, at least in the current situation. The reason why articles are required to be published in professional journals is to seek fair and just promotion methods, but as long as there are laws, there will be loopholes, which will lead to academic corruption. Just like the imperial examination, you can cite many disadvantages of the imperial examination, but for the past recommendation system, it is still progressive, even the fairest, because there is no other way to be fairer, which is helpless.

Just as we can only say that * * * capitalism is unrealistic, no one can say that * * * capitalism is not good, but even if it is good, it will not be realized now. This is a truth.

Confucius gave up politics and only studied because he realized that it was impossible to realize his ideal in productivity at that time. Give a simple example: the old are provided for, the young are widowed, and the lonely are provided for. Where is the money? Someone must be able to create more surplus wealth to support these people who can't work. At that time, productivity was low and it was impossible to support too many people who didn't work. Therefore, no matter how good the concept is, it is futile if there is no productivity.

Me: Yes, many things have come to a dead end. What you are talking about is the relationship between ideal and reality. The ideal can never be realized, but people still have to pursue it.

However, problems such as academic corruption can be solved, or can be solved. Of course it is inevitable, but it can happen as little as possible. For example, Japan and the West can solve the problem better, and if they find out, they will have to step down or go to jail.

Netizen b:

Management is to design a set of monsters to upgrade the game. The people you stand outside are unfair and do not represent the views of gamers.

Me:

Of course, we should also consider the special environment of China. As for how special the environment in China is, I'm not sure. Yes, we still have to pursue it. Whether it can be pursued or not is a metaphysical question.

I was advised to do academic problems, so I stopped doing them. Why do you do academic work? It is so boring. In fact, doing academic work has little impact. If you want to do it, you have to combine it with society and literature. Besides, my energy and time are limited. Play first.

Netizen a:

Even if academic fraud will step down, but the premise is to have a good trial mechanism, especially in the professional field, laymen can't judge right or wrong, even judges can't understand a professional paper, so the final trial power will fall into the hands of these academics, and finally they will cover up each other, or abuse power for personal gain and attack opponents, which may bring more problems.

The sentence that existence is reasonable is a misunderstanding in itself. Just as a thief exists, there must be a reason for his existence, and it is reasonable to be unreasonable.

Me:

On the issue of making money, I think it's better to take it slowly. To tell the truth, I still have some money. I don't need much money. I just want to have fun while I can ensure that I have enough food and clothing.

My pursuit is simple. From the perspective of China's entry into WTO, there are three major balances in life: health, money (material) and spirit.

These are all very important to me. Of course, this is a balanced mentality. For example, no matter how rich you are, I won't admire you when I look at my body. Look again, the spirit is not good, and I won't admire it. I may have to pay tribute to those who are strong in all three.

Netizen a:

There are reasons for these phenomena in the world of sound and shape, but it doesn't mean that those reasons are right and reasonable. Actually, they are unreasonable. Therefore, in order to find out the causes of these undesirable phenomena, we should correct these unreasonable reasons, not be calm.

Alas, thieves exist for a reason, but they are unreasonable. I don't want to dwell on this issue. If murder and robbery are reasonable, then this reason should be ignored.

Being reasonable doesn't mean being reasonable. What do you mean together?

Me:

I send an article that can help you understand this problem. China people's philosophical thinking ability is not very strong. That's for sure. On this issue, it depends on Hegel's true meaning. Please refer to my article.

China people's misunderstanding and analysis of "being is reasonable"

/p/7ac9bfda6ab8

I wrote it myself. After reading this question, you can easily understand the context of this sentence and why some people like to say it.

Netizen a:

Well, this rational analysis is enough, but I still don't quite agree with China's cognition. It emphasizes that many so-called bad habits in China are not objective. Even in western developed countries, many problems are badly handled and bad habits are strong. It is not only China's, but universal human nature. That's why China has so many sage ideas, just to educate the people. How can a country and nation in this world be morally perfect without education? Therefore, some of us say that to stand for heaven and earth and to live for the people is to set rules, stress morality and teach folk customs.

In fact, our ancestors never gave up their efforts to educate the world. It is normal for everyone to have ideological problems, so we need wise prophets to educate them.

This is not only a problem for China, but also for mankind.

Me:

In other words, we should base ourselves on the native land, and foreigners have their own foreigners to criticize themselves. I think their criticism is more profound than we thought. Of course, you can't criticize blindly. If it is good, we should praise it. Seven points for praise and three points for criticism have always been the propaganda policy of our party. Why, now that this tradition is gone, most of it has become praise, but less criticism. I am afraid that more people are afraid of getting into trouble.

Netizen c:

So I'm disgusted with this. . Bai Yang, for example, likes to criticize China people. Haha, this is an emotion. I do, and I'm sure others do. Of course, you can't cover everything. Your fans can only be emotionally similar to you.

You can write about China people.

Netizen a:

That's not true. If you add a China in front of people, there will be an attribute. I am from China, so when you scold people from China, you also scold me. This is naturally unacceptable. If this person means everyone, then there is no problem.

No, China is not, the United States is not, this is the position. A person who belittles one country is a person who exalts another. Without comparison, there is no competition, and only comparison can there be competition. Therefore, the concept of China people implies the meaning of comparison with foreigners.

Just like if someone says how bad Henan people are, they will be very angry. Why do people south of Heihe want it? Don't you say that you are talking about those bad Henan people, not all Henan people? Why is China serious and foreigners not?

Then when I say Henan garbage, I also mean some Henan garbage. Don't other Henan people beat me?

There is something wrong with your thinking logic. There is no need to discuss it. With my economic and historical experience all over the world, can you represent the people of China? There is no logic at all. This one you put forward has a great logical problem in itself, which is unreasonable. Then can I draw the inference that Henan people are illogical?

Because there must be someone in Henan who doesn't speak logic, I am right to use Beidou's logic in this statement. People who think they are talking about logic are actually very confused. This is really a serious illness. You can say that many people have thinking problems, but you can't say that many people in China have thinking problems. Are foreigners thinking well? This specifically refers to the accusation of a specific ethnic group, which is the basic logic.

Me:

There is something wrong with your logic. When we use China people, we also refer to some China people and those bad people. Aren't they from China? I think there is something wrong with your way of thinking. Logical relationship between set and individual.

A group of China people are uncivilized in Thailand. We all know that they are from China, not all from China. Do you want to write that the Japanese are not civilized? Of course, if you are Japanese, you must still write Japanese. Of course, there is a contrast, saying that China people have problems, but in fact it means that China people have serious problems, while foreigners are not serious in this respect. When we say China people, we actually mean some China people. What makes you say that China people are not serious?

You can represent the whole world.

In fact, there is no point in arguing about this. It is meaningful to point out, analyze and solve problems. What's the point of falling into these concepts? When I say China people, it already contains a part of the relationship.

Forget it, don't be ridiculous. It is a big problem to struggle with this. This is the same as what I thought a few years ago. I won't talk now, and I won't argue with others unless he takes the initiative to argue with me, which I can't do.

I have my own principles in this group. I'd better post an article. Unless someone else speaks first, I'll say a few words along his lines. Besides, I won't take the initiative to speak.

Everything you say is right, but it doesn't mean that everything others say is wrong. Actually, I already know what you mean.

Of course, this is also a way of expression, which only represents my personal views, not others. This is because of what I said, haha, I really need to be tactful, but my meaning is still the same.

Netizen c:

There is one thing to criticize. Just my personal opinion, some people in China. . Ha ha. . . So you can pull it, or you really can't watch it anymore. . . Although it may be a good article. .

For example, I recently watched Bi Feiyu's novel class. His level is quite high, but every article and speech will be added after the end. The above is my superficial understanding. Please correct me.

This is not a cliche, it is sincere. When he talks about A Dream of Red Mansions, he must be the opposite of many redologists. . But it can be expressed. . Modest expression wins more respect. . .

There is a person who just likes to express his views and is not modest. . I have been defeated by several historical masters. You can talk to him. . I feel that you are getting closer to him. . . Ha ha laugh

Self-criticism. Support you, Rousseau's Confessions. . In fact, everyone has to write a book. . Haha, criticize yourself and support Rousseau's confession. . In fact, everyone has to write a book. . Ha ha laugh

Me:

Handsome boy, you should add some China people every time, every time. In my opinion, I have to add every time, and my remarks only represent my personal views. Then, add a lot of personal words, respected leaders, respected guests and respected friends. ......

When I spoke, I already included the above contents, comrades, which is obviously included. Of course, if you engage in academics, you probably won't. Personally, I think this is a prerequisite. If you add it everywhere, what can you say?

My meaning is clear. I'm gonna shut up.

Let me add, watching occasions, chatting in general and adding these things, is it very tired and boring?

I don't know. Sometimes it's modesty, sometimes it's servility. It depends on the occasion. Of course, modesty is sometimes a kind of self-protection, just like flattery, it is sometimes necessary. No matter how honest a person is, he will be under special circumstances, which does not mean that he is not humorous at all.

I have a group of excellent authors, many of whom are experts.

Netizen a:

In addition, representing personal views is not polite, but awe of knowledge. No one can say that what he says is the truth, and everyone is just on the road of exploration. So adding my personal opinion means that I may not be right, but I may be wrong. It's just my momentary thought and my awe of the truth.

Me:

Actually, what you said is quite right, and I agree with you. But the occasion is different, and some occasions are actually unnecessary, because this prerequisite has been implied. Of course, you can definitely recognize it, or you can not point it out. Personally, I think it is ok. Haha, let me add my personal opinion, so it may be easier and less aggressive. People, it is so strange.

Everyone has no malice, and all expressions are just. You know, I know, there is no need to rise to the psychological level, so I feel very uncomfortable. To tell the truth, I enjoyed arguing with others a few years ago, but I felt very uncomfortable after the argument. However, I have already discovered this problem, so I seldom argue. I have passed this stage unless I have to. So, I said, there is no need to pay too much attention to this argument.

Thank you for your discussion. I'll put it in the article. That's the name, "I personally think". Are these words necessary?