In the third Middle East War in Russia, why were two soldiers killed by heat during military training?

This problem needs to be considered from three aspects, one is equipment performance, the other is military culture, and the third is national character.

Let's talk about the performance of the equipment first. Russian equipment is not only rough and bold, but also has the characteristics of fair caliber. But the general difference is that the ergonomics of Russian equipment is extremely low. After all, Russia has a "fine tradition" in which tank drivers bring their own small hammers to shift gears. Such problems not only caused the decline of equipment performance, but also caused such non-combat attrition events.

Moreover, Russia is located in the cold zone of high latitude, and the equipment itself did not consider the problem of heat dissipation at the beginning of design. But the climate in the Middle East is completely opposite to that in Russia.

Secondly, to say that Russian military culture is also full of militancy; "Only cowards can complete training" is the most vivid portrayal of Russian military culture. In Russia, the word coward is also the biggest insult to a person.

Finally, the national character. Russia's national character itself is eclectic, which is also the universal character of almost all high-latitude nationalities. If you can't understand, compare your roommates in the northeast with those in the south. Basically, they all belong to the uninhibited and exquisite kind. And such a rough and unrestrained character will inevitably lead to carelessness.

To sum up, the main reason why two soldiers were killed by heat during military training was equipment and military management problems.