Which is better, Tucson or Lion Run?

In terms of power, Tucson and Lion Run are exactly the same, and CR-V has a slight advantage.

It is necessary to explain first that today we are comparing all the models of version 2.0. This is because, from a practical point of view, as an urban SUV, this displacement should have met most of our needs, and it has better fuel economy. Therefore, although all three cars have larger displacement versions, we still recommend 2.0 liters of power matching.

From the data point of view, Tucson's book scored the lowest. Although the maximum torque of 184Nm/4500rpm is the same as that of Lion Run, the maximum power of 104kW/6000rpm is 2kW less than that of its brother. The champion in data is CR-V, equipped with Honda 2.0 L i-VTEC engine, with maximum power 1 10 kW/6500rpm and maximum torque 190 Nm/4000rpm, which is higher than Korean competitors in two aspects.

From a technical point of view, the engines of Tucson and Lion Run are the same, both of which are the DOHC engines of CVVT. Although this engine has reached the advanced level in the world, it is still slightly inferior to Honda's intelligent variable valve timing and lift electronic control system (i-VTEC). CR-V can produce the maximum torque in generate at 4000 rpm, and its acceleration performance is obviously much better than that of Korean brothers at the low speed of urban road conditions. Comparing the 0- 100km/h acceleration performance of Tucson 12 second and Lion Run 13. 1 second, CR-V's 10.2 second is enough to illustrate. However, as the saying goes, Korean brothers are slightly better than CR-V in the middle and late stages of continuous acceleration, especially Lion Run, with a top speed of 195km, which is the absolute leader among the three cars.

In terms of space, this has always been the strength of SUVs. There is little difference between the three cars in this respect. Comparatively speaking, CR-V has the most spacious space, while Tucson's luggage compartment has the largest volume.

In terms of internal space, because the external dimensions of the three cars are almost the same, there is little difference in passenger compartment space. In terms of luggage compartment space, although Tucson's rear body design focuses on sliding behind the car, the cargo volume after putting down the rear seat reaches 1856L, ranking first among the three cars. Lion Run, which is close to it, comes second with the loading space of1570l. As for CR-V, its luggage compartment is slightly smaller than that of the first two competitors, but it can reach 1390L by putting down the back seat.

Judging from the passability, the results of the three opponents can only be regarded as barely. According to the comprehensive data, Tucson's performance is slightly stronger.

Since it is an SUV, even if it is urbanized, the biggest difference with cars is better passability. Simply put, several important parameters that affect the trafficability of vehicles are wheelbase, approach angle, departure angle and minimum ground clearance.

The shorter the vertical passing angle, the bigger the cross-country running, which explains why there are more cars with short wheelbase. However, unlike professional off-road racing, the first task of these three SUV models is to ensure the seating space, so there is not much room for manoeuvre in the wheelbase. Compared with the three cars, the Tucson and Lion Run with the same chassis are both 2630mm, while the CR-V is not much shorter, and the wheelbase of 2625mm is only 5mm worse than that of the opponent.

Friends who like off-road vehicles know that the approach angle and departure angle of off-road vehicles determine its ability to cross ditches. In this respect, the results of the three cars with urban roads as the main battlefield are not satisfactory. Among the three cars, Tucson has the best comprehensive performance, with approach angle of 28.2 and departure angle of 365,438+0.9. The lion ran second, approach angle 29, departure angle 27; CR-V is the most difficult, with approach angle of 28 and departure angle of only 24.

The minimum ground clearance is also very important to the passing capacity of the vehicle, which determines whether the chassis will be damaged when the vehicle passes through obstacles. Among the three cars, CR-V has the largest minimum ground clearance, but its 205mm performance is only 10mm and 15mm higher than Tucson and Lion Run.

From the above data alone, it is not difficult to see the congenital shortcomings of the three cars in off-road aspects. Needless to say, four-wheel drive or not, from the data of the car body alone, the ability of these three cars to climb over the ditch is very limited, and when they are on the road in the city, it may be the time when they show greater superiority than cars. Once in the wilderness without roads, there is still a big gap between these three cars and real off-road vehicles. Although they also hold the title of SUV, their real off-road ability is not strong, and the dirt road in rural areas may be the main battlefield for them to play off-road ability. On weekends or holidays, it should be their greatest pleasure to occasionally scatter joy in the suburbs, go deep into some rotten roads that ordinary cars dare not challenge, and even enter some beaches and rivers that cars dare not enter.

Comprehensive evaluation shows that Tucson has the highest cost performance, the lion running has the most beautiful appearance, and CR-V has the most obvious urban sense.

Limited by space, it's time to sum up again. On the whole, the three cars have their own advantages and disadvantages.

Tucson first. No matter from the interior space, passing performance or configuration level, Tucson's performance in the three cars is quite outstanding. Although the 2.0-liter Tucson has only manual transmission models to choose from, the official guide price of 654.38+095.8 million yuan and the actual market price of 654.38+08 million yuan have also won the best cost performance among the three cars. At the same time, with the help of the after-sales service network developed by Beijing Hyundai in recent years, Tucson is more assured in future maintenance. As for dissatisfaction or workmanship, the relatively rough craftsmanship of the three cars is still somewhat disappointing.

Besides, the lion runs. As the brother model of Tucson, under the premise of the same chassis foundation and power matching, the appearance of Lion Run undoubtedly brings consumers another choice. Personally, Lion Run is even more attractive than Tucson in appearance and interior layout, and its 4-speed automatic manual transmission also makes driving more convenient. However, as an imported car, Lion Run was originally positioned slightly lower than Tucson. Now the price of 2,465,438+0.2 million yuan makes its cost-effective advantage no longer exist. Friends who choose to import lion running may have to spend more money on this unique shape.

Finally, talk about CR-V. The products of the old car factory always give us the impression of high quality and low price. In all fairness, CR-V is a popular urban SUV model in the world, and its success is no accident. As a city car, CR-V obviously focuses on road driving performance. Easy control, smooth control and comfortable ride all make CR-V look like a car. Although, it can also be used as a tool to go to the countryside during holidays. In terms of price, the official guide price of the new CR-V 2.0AT is 227,800 yuan, but there are many discounts of 1 10,000 yuan. I think this is also the benefit that competition brings to our people. As for after-sales service, due to the particularity of CR-V, it can be repaired in the special sales service stores of Guangzhou Honda and Dongfeng Honda, which is really quite convenient for car owners to buy.