Joke Collection Website - Mood Talk - During the epidemic prevention and control period, patients in Shanghai Nanhui isolation point looted materials, and what legal consequences will the relevant personnel have?

During the epidemic prevention and control period, patients in Shanghai Nanhui isolation point looted materials, and what legal consequences will the relevant personnel have?

The epidemic in Shanghai has entered the public's field of vision, and the number of people who have skyrocketed in a short period of time has reached 10,000. Infected people are in great pain, and uninfected people are also under great psychological and physical pressure because of being isolated.

There are three possibilities.

The first one: if there is indeed a situation of chaotic management and no one sticking to it, and it has not caused serious property losses and personal injuries, then the legal consequences of these people may not be investigated.

Second: If there is indeed chaotic management and unmanned operation, and there are significant property losses or personal injuries, then those who make these behaviors will be punished by relevant laws.

The third type: if there is no management problem after investigation, the looting of materials is planned by the patients at the isolation point, and no personal injury or property loss is caused, and public security punishment will be imposed; If personal injury or property loss is caused, the actor shall bear corresponding responsibilities.

Analysis on the looting of goods by patients at Nanhui isolation point in Shanghai

First of all, through rational analysis, we can see that there are some problems in material management when there is such a thing as looting materials. The epidemic suddenly appeared around us, causing people's panic. In the face of survival crisis, plunder is an instinctive reaction of human beings. There have been disasters and looting of food since ancient times. As long as there are no serious incidents such as heavy casualties, I believe that the laws of China have a temperature within the controllable range.

Secondly, from the analysis of criminal law, if people gather to plunder public or private property, and the amount is relatively large or there are other serious circumstances, the ringleaders and active participants shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention or control, and fined; If the amount is huge or there are other particularly serious circumstances, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than 10 years and shall also be fined. If the plot does not constitute a mob looting, it depends on whether the plot is to stir up trouble or endanger public safety. Special treatment in a special period, I think it is basically not a qualitative crime.

There are no more than two reasons for robbing patients at isolation points:

First, there is a shortage of basic materials. Looking around, what was looted was just some quilts, food and drinking water. Because of the epidemic, many people have to do this in order to survive.

The second is the sense of oppression and panic caused by the epidemic. This epidemic has been with us for three years. From the beginning of the epidemic to today, what happened in the past is vivid. At the beginning of the epidemic, everyone grabbed masks. It is precisely because of the previous experience that everyone is afraid that they will be desperate to grab supplies after being isolated. This is a human instinct and a fear of the unknown consequences of the epidemic.

Seeing people's hearts under the disaster, Shanghai compatriots just showed human's desire for survival. I don't understand their feelings, but I don't rule out meeting them one day. Maybe I was not as good as them then.

From a purely legal point of view, during the epidemic prevention and control period, looting security materials may constitute the crime of looting materials or the crime of stirring up trouble. However, what the people robbed was nothing more than some basic materials in life, and the quantity was not large, which did not cause casualties or significant impact and losses. So it does not constitute a criminal offence.