Is there any prospect of exclusively selling local pork in rural areas?

Animal husbandry needs development as much as planting. The state has also formulated several subsidy policies for animal husbandry, such as subsidizing the harmless treatment of feces and subsidizing the cultivation of excellent varieties. Theoretically speaking, raising local pigs can be an important investment choice for farmers. If there is no sales path and ideas, it is recommended to raise ordinary pigs, so making money is relatively stable. If you are a local pig farmer, local pigs will be sold as ordinary pigs. Farmers are advised to raise pigs.

Now more and more people like to eat pork, is it because farmers will raise pigs in the direction of pollution-free organic agriculture? In fact, pollution-free organic agriculture is the direction that all farmers strive for. But please think about it first. Without feed and antibiotics, which is harmless agriculture?

Perhaps the pollution-free agriculture in everyone's mind is not to feed, but I think this is an unreasonable concept. Feed itself is from animals to humans. Not only harmless, but also more reasonable in nutrition, more in line with the needs of animals, and the natural bioavailability will be greater. Only in the development period of aquaculture history, in order to meet the needs of a specific period, several growth promoters were added to food, which caused long-term harm to human body.

Today, the country is more and more strict with food additives. Antibiotics have not been allowed to be added to food as food additives. Therefore, feeding pigs with food now will not do much harm to human beings. Judging from the occurrence of midwifery diseases, it is really difficult to use antibiotics in large-scale agriculture. I have always said that it is difficult for large pig farms to produce real green pork because large-scale farming needs antibiotics at present.