With the subsidy for rural teachers, why can't rural schools keep teachers?

I have been teaching in the countryside 15 years, and I want to share my thoughts with you.

Now we all have subsidies for rural teachers, but teachers still have to leave when they have the opportunity. I think there are several reasons. Please forgive me if there is anything wrong.

First, I'm too tired. Most students in rural schools go home once a week and basically live on campus at other times. This increases the workload. Not only should we prepare lessons for teaching, but the class teacher should also manage students' morning exercises, lunch breaks, late reading, late rest and normal life every day. I am a general teacher, and I arrange weekly duty every semester. After a week, I feel very tired, let alone being a class teacher.

Second, the status is low. Nine-year compulsory education is good. I've met many students who can still enjoy their education in a very poor family economy. This is a very good starting point. But there are both positive and negative aspects. For example, a junior two student often doesn't study hard, sleeps in class and drinks at night, but the class teacher still doesn't want to repent after repeated education. Once playing poker in class, it was confiscated by the subject teacher and had an argument with the teacher. Later, I refused to accept the discipline of the head teacher, so I left the classroom with my schoolbag on my back and said to the whole class: The head teacher will come home and invite me to school in a few days. Then turn around and leave. After repeated persuasion, I went back to school Where is the teacher's face? ! How can I teach this class in the future? !

3. The overall quality of students is low. Really, really can hear swearing at any time; Students pass you by and ignore your existence. Teaching can't achieve satisfactory results. Many teachers often say when they come to the office after class: I am a one-man show again today. Only a few students pay attention to you when asking questions. This kind of teaching effect will not lead to good results. Without grades, there will be no sense of accomplishment. Without a sense of accomplishment, how can you be happy?

This is the real situation here.

I am a grass-roots teacher. I graduated from a secondary normal school 20 years ago and was assigned back to the countryside where I was born and raised. I have been teaching since then. Because the county where I teach belongs to the suburbs, it doesn't depend on mountains or tablelands. In Ma Pingchuan, there has never been a rural teacher subsidy for 20 years. In the first few years, I really regretted coming back. At that time, we had a little way to graduate and could stay in the city to teach. The school is close to home 10 km. I go to work by bike every day. Because of the inconvenient transportation, the road is a standard dirt road. When it rains, the road is completely cement, so I can only ride a bike. On holidays, teachers should take turns on duty, buy instant noodles at lunch time, and go to the village 1 km away from school. I remember, at that time, I occasionally got together with my normal classmates, and everyone was talking about the company and what to send during the holidays. I'm just listening, because we have nothing but basic salary and other benefits, and we seldom discuss such topics with you. Thankfully, with the acceleration of urbanization, my place has now become a new city. Now the conditions are getting better and better, and the salary level of teachers has been equal to that of their peers in the old city.

With the experience of rural work, let's look at the topic now. I think we should double the salary of rural teachers first. A subsidy of several hundred dollars a month is really unattractive to people. That's because the survey report of a domestic recruitment website shows that the average monthly salary of domestic fresh graduates is around 8000 yuan. In the environment of talent flow and difficult living environment, to attract outstanding talents, it is not lower than that in developed regions, but to pay higher salaries. This is also the experience of Japan and the United States in developing rural education. Teachers who go to work in rural areas are paid more than those in towns.

Secondly, we should improve the living environment of rural teachers. In the past, when promoting the most beautiful rural teachers, too much emphasis was placed on their selfless dedication, hard work and no remuneration. Their spirit is really commendable. However, these propaganda can't keep outstanding talents. On the contrary, it gives people a "bitter" image of rural teachers. It is suggested that rural teachers focus on the construction of affordable housing near their work units to solve the problems of life security such as medical care, children's education and old-age care that teachers care about. Instead of a teacher who has taught in the countryside for 30 years, relying on a rural teacher's honorary certificate makes people happy, and there is no real benefit. Constantly improve the treatment of rural teachers in all aspects, truly make rural teachers' careers attractive, and truly reflect the sense of professional honor of rural teachers.

I am a teacher in a rural school. I am in the outer suburbs of Lanzhou. There is no subsidy for rural teachers. In 2003, our school established an independent high school with about 140 teaching staff and about 1400 students. Fifteen years later, the number of students has dropped to more than 700, and there are about 80 teachers. The average age of teachers in the school is 47 years old. With the arrival of five or six young people last year, the average age has decreased.

Many young people try their best to enter the city. Why?

First, the quality of students in rural schools is getting worse and worse. No matter how hard the teacher tries, he can't teach. Without a sense of professional accomplishment, it is difficult for young people to improve their teaching level and win teaching honors, which will affect their professional titles and income.

Second, the living conditions are not good. Young people from other places live in dormitories and cook by themselves. Many of them can't cook. There is no TV and internet in the dormitory, so life is very inconvenient. To put it bluntly, it is difficult to find a partner.

Third, there is no guarantee for the future. There are fewer and fewer students, many rural schools are facing the withdrawal and merger, and young people transfer to other schools, which has a great impact and can only leave as early as possible.

The above views and personal opinions are welcome to communicate with friends.

I have been teaching in the countryside for 3 1 year, and I am still teaching in the front line of the countryside. I guess I just retired. I want to share my thoughts with you.

In fact, rural teachers in many places have not received rural teacher subsidies for the time being. We are very lucky. Now rural teachers have enjoyed rural teacher subsidies for five years, but young teachers still go whenever they have the chance, and try their best to go to the county seat, relying on the county seat-two colleagues tried their best to enter the county seat this semester. Analyzing the reasons, I think there are mainly the following points:

The country teacher is too tired. Most students in rural schools go home once a week and basically live on campus at other times. This increases the workload of teachers. They not only have to prepare lessons and teach, but also the class teacher has to manage the students' daily morning exercises, lunch breaks, late reading and late rest, and the usual meals-carefully calculate, some places are simply called "eight attendance", the class teacher must be present, and there is an administrative duty check and registration. I am a general teacher, and the school arranges two nights of self-study to get off work every week. I feel very tired on this day every week, let alone the class teacher.

The status of rural teachers is low. Nine-year compulsory education is good in essence. I have met many students from poor families who can still enjoy education. This is a very good starting point. But there are both positive and negative aspects.

Let's give an example. Many years ago, an eighth-grade student often didn't study hard, slept in class, led a group of bad guys to smoke in the toilet, played cards and gambled in the dormitory ... The class teacher did not repent after repeated education. I once read a romance novel in English class, but I had an argument with my teacher after it was confiscated. Later, he disobeyed the teacher in charge and went home with his schoolbag on his back. I was so anxious that the class teacher stopped him at once. If you really want to go, drive him home. He told some people in the class privately that the head teacher would come home and invite me to school in a few days.

The student was persuaded many times before returning to school. Where is the teacher's face? ! How can I teach this class in the future? ! But now this phenomenon is much better-some students leave without permission, so they won't "beg" him to come to school, and occasionally they will persuade a poor student to leave-or let parents take him home for education and reflection for a while without violating the policy; Or persuade his parents to find a way to change the environment for their children, that is, "transfer."

Poor students in rural schools. Really, the overall quality of rural students is generally low, and you can really hear swearing at any time; Some students pass you by, but ignore your existence, and sometimes tease you. This is only the second, the most important thing is that they also use the classroom as a playground-but the school I have been to is ok, and most students are polite after education.

The most important thing is that teaching often fails to achieve satisfactory results. On the way back to the office after class, I often unconsciously say one or two words about myself (probably what many teachers often say or think of after class): I am singing a monologue again today, and this class is of little effect and useless.

Only a few students pay attention to you when asking questions. This kind of teaching effect will not lead to good results. Without grades, there will be no sense of accomplishment. Without a sense of accomplishment, how can you be happy? Sometimes I feel relieved and don't take my grades seriously. Even if the school's evaluation of the model association depends entirely on the teaching results, it still implements the "one-vote veto": if the teaching results are not up to B or above, I will not be able to evaluate what is excellent (model association), and there is no way to talk about teachers' morality.

Therefore, the quality of students, especially their ideology and morality, is also valued, but all this depends on family education, especially from childhood-after all, parents are their first teachers. My efforts the day after tomorrow can only be my best.

At present, the current situation of rural schools is obvious to all: better teachers are trying to squeeze into the county seat, and good students are also drilling into the county seat.

The living conditions in the countryside are not very good. Young people from other places live in dormitories and cook by themselves. Many of them can't cook. There is no TV and internet in the dormitory, so life is inconvenient. To put it bluntly, it is difficult to find a partner.

Most of these young people who have just joined the work are also class teachers. They usually have too many things to do, and they are often too busy to eat. Fortunately, many rural school leaders have realized this now. Central primary schools and township junior high schools have generally improved greatly. First of all, make sure you are full, and then pay attention to eating well.

There is no guarantee for the future. There are fewer and fewer students, many rural schools are facing the withdrawal and merger, and young people transfer to other schools, which has a great impact and can only leave as early as possible. This situation is more obvious in some small villages. I have been to several villages in a township, and some village directors and village party secretaries (or relatives) have stretched out their hands too wide. In their eyes, the village is his home, and almost no one dares to say "no" in which classroom he wants to pile up sundries-do you still want to teach here? The sky is high and the emperor is far away, and the principals of central primary schools generally lag far behind and are at their mercy.

Most of the above is the real situation of rural schools in many places at present. To change this situation, I think we should first double the salary of rural teachers. A subsidy of several hundred dollars a month is really unattractive to people.

Teachers in remote mountainous areas of our county also have car subsidies, which are also called "transportation subsidies". This is also a privilege. Local teachers in general, especially those who reach a certain age, are often reluctant to leave, and inadvertently get several more salaries.

Now the titles of rural teachers are also tilting: many teachers who have no hope in senior positions have increased their capital accordingly. Whether you have a senior teacher qualification certificate or not, if you want to teach in the countryside for 30 years, you can naturally be promoted to a senior title-you only get a senior seven-level salary, but you don't issue a formal employment certificate; Once he leaves the rural school, the treatment of this senior teacher will be over.

In rural schools with difficult living environment, to attract outstanding talents, it is not lower than that in developed areas, but to pay higher wages. This is also the experience of Japan and the United States in developing rural education. Teachers who go to work in rural areas have higher salaries than those in cities and towns, and good teachers who stay in rural areas are much higher, and they are willing to stay in rural areas for a long time, even for life, without regrets.

Many people are in high spirits when they see the news of teachers' salary increase, especially in rural areas, saying that a large number of urban teachers will return to the countryside. After deducting the round-trip fare and subsidizing 200, I really don't know who I can keep. But recently, I deeply realized that I want to leave.

This Wednesday is my grandmother's birthday. I am speechless when I see that all my family members are shouting for reunion, especially the news that my cousin who went to school in other places came back specially. Psychology is particularly sour. The countryside is more than 30 miles from the city. People who go home by car for 30 minutes can't go home, and some people can't go home by train for half a day. As a rural teacher, he can't be filial and can't give money to help when he is in trouble. Rural teachers have nothing to do all their lives. What is the reason for persistence?

Please enter a picture description.

Teaching in the countryside, the biggest feeling is loneliness. It seems that it is only 30 or even 20 miles away from home, but due to work restrictions, I have to take classes almost all the time from 5 am to evening 10 (the class teacher is strict). Usually almost isolated from family entertainment. Everyone understands that I work in the countryside and can't come back. But once or twice is understandable, but with more times, the relationship will naturally alienate.

Please enter a picture description.

Relatives are still like this, let alone friends. Entertainment between friends will be forgotten if you don't come. Not only feelings, but also all kinds of latest information will slowly fade away. Slowly become an island. I have a good friend who works in urban construction. We used to talk every time we met. Now that we meet, we are all a little embarrassed and don't know what to say. In fact, behind the appearance is that after working in the countryside, it has gradually lost its use value. Can a rural subsidy of 200 yuan solve the problem?

Please enter a picture description.

Some people interpret the relationship between people as mutual use, which is too biased, but after careful analysis, we will find that even relatives, in addition to family ties, make better use of high-value popularity, even if they have a bad temper. As a rural teacher, no matter how much salary is given above, it is the salary on the payroll. Calculated by the actual punching salary, the gap between the two standards is several thousand yuan. However, there are still some welfare subsidies in rural areas, and there will be few opportunities for part-time jobs. 200 yuan in the countryside can't fill this hole. The money was directly transferred to ko.

Please enter a picture description.

Not to mention interpersonal relationships, many rural female teachers have problems finding a spouse because of the closed circle, let alone interpersonal communication. In addition, the countryside itself is backward and closed, and the problem is more prominent. I am more influenced by ko.

Please enter a picture description.

In fact, I think the most serious problem is the education of children. It is hard for people who have not experienced it to imagine how difficult intergenerational migration is. Only after listening to my parents did I know how much their generation has paid to move from rural areas to cities, and the most critical factor is knowledge and education. Although many people say that academic qualifications depreciate, it is still the biggest shortcut to change fate. The work of rural teachers is likely to cause big problems for teachers' children in the education of the next generation.

Please enter a picture description.

I wonder if anyone has seen the learning state of rural students from primary school to junior high school to senior high school. Boring study killed their interest in learning, and intergenerational education made them lose their self-restraint. There is no denying that rural education has gone downhill and is plummeting. At present, only one fifth of the people in a school can go to high school. In this environment, it is difficult for teachers' children to go to high school, so some rural teachers still have to leave for the education of the next generation.

Please enter a picture description.

Some people may say that I discriminate against rural education. I want to say that as a front-line worker, I just say what I see. Many powerful policies are ultimately lacking in strong implementation. Almost every teacher has received a rural subsidy of 200 yuan to punch in directly, but do you know that it took three years for a teacher to get his 30-year honorary certificate? Rural teachers don't have to wait for anything. Those under the age of 30 can pass the postgraduate entrance examination, take an examination of civil servants and jump out of the countryside as soon as possible. Their previous work can be regarded as giving back to the countryside and trying to jump out. The future is expected. Waiting blindly, the result will only be a bleak future, and you have trained yourself and your children.

Please enter a picture description.

First, rural schools are generally small in scale, with many students and poor living and accommodation conditions. Some people after 90 and 00 can't eat bitterness, or give up or transfer.

Second, the teaching and research atmosphere in rural schools is poor, new teachers can't get learning and guidance, personal professional growth is slow, and there is no future.

Third, many special posts and recruiting teachers come from places with good conditions, and schools are often too far away from home, making communication inconvenient. You can't take root in another country.

Fourth, rural school life is monotonous, and few people know and contact with it, so it is difficult for many school-age young teachers to find objects. Force them to leave.

V. Family ties Taking the countryside as a springboard and working for one or two years, you naturally have the ability to transfer to a place with good conditions. Other young teachers took the civil service and career exams and left.

In short, rural schools can't keep teachers, and there are fewer and fewer students. Many small villages and teaching points have disappeared, hoping to attract the attention of the government.

With the subsidy for rural teachers, why can't rural schools keep teachers? This question is just an expression. There are still students going to school in rural areas. People have classes every day, just willing and unwilling. In the past, graduates were assigned jobs, some in big cities and some in poor valleys. Didn't everyone go? Nothing can be done. Children in poor mountain valleys should also study. The country also knows that rural teachers can work hard and give more subsidies, not more. Teachers themselves feel that being a teacher in the countryside is no worse than teaching in the city. There is also the evaluation of teachers' titles. Rural teachers are automatically promoted to senior titles after 25 years. For those who have worked in the countryside for 30 years, they will be given a one-time subsidy when they retire, and they will be paid 40 months' salary like civil servants after their death. There are many ways. Now that rural teachers have subsidies, they still can't keep teachers. That's because they're not in place yet. By comparison, cities are better than rural areas. One day, the treatment of rural teachers was really good, and everyone was vying to be rural teachers. Ha ha! ! !

Based on years of experience in rural school education and the understanding and analysis of the current situation of rural schools, I think that one of the main reasons why rural schools can't keep teachers is the problem of students, which has little to do with teachers' salaries or rural teachers' subsidies.

Judging from the current subsidy standards, rural teachers in our district receive more rural subsidies in 500 yuan than teachers in county towns every month. Compared with the salaries of primary and secondary school teachers, this figure should also be attractive.

Rural teachers' allowance has been implemented for about five years. However, more than 10 years ago, it has become a common phenomenon that many teachers and students in rural schools ran away and were merged.

1990, when I just graduated from teaching in this township school, there were seven administrative villages in the whole country, each village had a complete primary school, and there were at least three or four district teaching points under each administrative village. In this way, there are nearly 30 primary schools and schools in the township. But around 2000, except for one township, there were only five village primary schools in the whole region, with 1 teaching point, and several villages were merged after the primary schools.

In addition to junior high schools, there used to be three junior high schools in my township, and one was merged in 2000 and one in 2008. In 20 17, the only junior high school in a township merged with the junior high school in another town to form a new campus, which actually means that there is no junior high school in this township. The original township junior high school is now converted into a township complete primary school, which is under construction.

Now, let's go back to the question: Why can't we keep teachers with generous subsidies for rural teachers?

I believe that everyone knows the reasons:

1, school-age children showed a linear decreasing trend at that time;

2. A large number of migrant workers go to cities to work, and their children go to cities to study with their parents;

3. A large number of rural children flock to county schools;

4. Students are lost and teachers are forced to transfer;

5. The influence of educational resources concentration policy on running schools;

6. In terms of teachers' quality, on the one hand, fresh blood supplement can't keep up, on the other hand, a large number of rural teachers retire because of their age.

It is the above reasons that lead to the serious loss of former rural teachers.

Let me also talk about my situation. 200 1 join the work. I am an ordinary English teacher. After graduation, I was assigned to a middle school in a small town more than 0/00 kilometers away from home (my home is near the county seat). The road conditions are not very good. It takes about two and a half hours to drive home. I haven't moved my nest since 18, so life in the town is still convenient. I have been a senior teacher for two years now. We have a care policy for rural teachers to evaluate their professional titles. Basically, you can evaluate it as soon as you reach the teaching age. Wages have been unsatisfactory, and it took five or six years to raise wages substantially. In the first two years, when the county finance was good, the punch card salary was almost 8000, and the rural subsidy of 1050 was about 9000. The salary at the end of the year was 13 months, but it was just the basic salary. Provident fund monthly 1 150+ 150. If you don't buy a house, you can't use it The local house price is less than 4,000 yuan, and all the senior titles retired in the past two years have a pension of about 7,500 yuan. My wife and I are both teachers in the same school, and the income in the small county town of the 18th line should be said to be good. Except for a few young people who have just joined the work (Tegang teachers clock in 3800 a month), every household in the school has a car, generally ranging from10-150,000, and there are also several families with good conditions of more than 200,000, the best of which is a glc and a Prado. There are houses in the city, and of course most of them have mortgages. Although I feel unhappy, what can I do? Compared with the income of colleagues in Shandong, Henan and Anhui, our side is ok. Such is the education in rural schools. Although teachers' income varies widely, it should be said that rural education in China is also facing similar problems, such as students being pinched, parents not paying attention to education and poor learning atmosphere. However, compared with colleagues in the city, the work is relatively easy. In other words, there are gains and losses, and rural teachers also have troubles. I think it is mainly in three aspects. One is the education of children. The learning atmosphere of rural education is not good, so it is sent back to the city. The other is the medical problem. The medical conditions in rural areas are not good, and many problems cannot be handled. You have to ask for leave when you run to a big hospital in the city.