Does Ma Chao really recognize the thief as his father? Is it really as unbearable as Lu Bu?

Ma Chao is a brilliant figure in the novel Romance of the Three Kingdoms (Ma Chao played by An Yaping in the old version of Romance of the Three Kingdoms is very classic). He avenged his father, rebelled against Cao, fought naked, killed Cao and cut off his robe. Later, he fought bravely with Zhang Fei, loyal to the world, and his reputation spread far and wide, and he was a famous star through the ages. However, romance is romance after all, and there is still a big gap with historical facts.

In history, Ma Chao took the lead, Cao Cao killed his family, and Ma Chao indirectly killed his family, so many people said that Ma Chao was unfilial, and he was quite criticized at that time ("You killed the thief of the monarch behind your father's back, and heaven and earth tolerated you for a long time, but you didn't die early. How dare you treat others with your face!" )。 If Ma Chao is really unfilial and bent on opposing Cao, will he kill his father and exterminate the nation?

I don't think so. Why did Ma Chao arise against Cao? In the 16th year of Jian 'an (2 1 1), Cao Cao sent armies such as Zhong You and Xia to try to attack Zhang Lu through the territory of Liangzhou warlords such as Ma Chao. This makes people suspect that this is a fake plan to cut off the enemy's way. Cao Cao attempted to annex Liangzhou. So Ma Chao joined forces with Han Sui and other generals of Xiliang to fight against Cao Cao. Ma Teng, Ma Chao and others are Liangzhou warlords, and Cao Cao's ultimate goal is to seize their territory and destroy their rights. As long as their territory and power are still there, they are still safe. When Cao Cao's army arrived, Ma Chao was right to attack first, even Ma Teng would certainly do so. This is a political struggle. If you win, you can rest easy. You lose, you lose.

As long as Ma Chao is not defeated, Marten is safe in Beijing. Unfortunately, Ma Chao finally failed, and Cao Cao killed Ma Teng and his family after the victory. Cao Cao did not kill Ma Teng and others at the beginning of Ma Chao's army. It was only after Ma Chao's defeat that he killed Xia, Mei, Gui Wei and Zhu Teng in the seventeenth year of Jian 'an (Renchen, AD 2 12). It also proves this point. If you start fighting, you will die. If you don't start fighting, you will die sooner or later The result is the same. Therefore, it is inappropriate for Ma Chao to ignore the lives of his father and family. This is the price of failure, but victory is not necessarily the case.

Ma Chao once said to Han Sui, "Now I have abandoned my father and taken the general as my father. The general should also abandon his son and take Chao as his son. " I have to say, this is shameless. But Han Sui and Marten are half-brothers, and they have a good relationship. It was only later that they met for territory. Now that we are outnumbered, it is understandable for Ma Chao to make friends with Han Sui based on the interests alliance. It's not like "recognizing the thief as the father". Again, this is the best choice. Later, Cao Cao alienated the relationship between them, which also showed the correctness of Ma Chao's practice.

Let's think about it from another angle. Dong Zhuo wants to take you as his adopted son. You know, Dong Zhuo's dictatorship and leadership level are similar. If the leader lets you be his adopted son, he will give you face. Dare you refuse? ~~~~

When Lu Bu refused to accept it, all the splendor was gone ... Dong Zhuo casually gave you a little shoe to wear, and you still want to play house with the story of Diusim? ~ ~ It's really impossible. Right ~ ~?

In addition, I don't think Lu Bu will be stupid enough to report: I don't know whether to apply for Fat Dong to be my michel platini ~ ~, and I hope the leader will give me an instruction ~ ~. It can't be like this ... Lu Bu only recognized the thief as his father to save his position. What's more, Dong Zhuo and Lu Bu also have a relationship of mutual use ... isn't it?

I think that Lu Bu didn't really recognize the thief as his father. It was just a political game, but it turned out to be a negative teaching material. People can't help themselves in the Jianghu. If you get something, you will definitely lose something ... isn't it the same now ~ ~?

Ask yourself, the leader wants you to help him drink, which is to give you face. Dare you refuse ~ ~ ~? ! ! Do similar things often happen to us?