Is it better to open a shop now than to set up a stall? How to treat the weak position of shops?

Physical stores, stalls, new live broadcasts this year, he must have a reasonable place.

Different years, different trade methods, and business models can't tell the good from the bad.

Take the comparison between the store owner and the stall owner. Both have existed since ancient times. The boss who can open a shop in Hong Kong is a little poor. Of course, these years are really helpless, and there are not a few people who borrow money to open stores.

It is not easy for anyone to make a living without making a fortune.

When the epidemic came this year, many physical stores closed down. After all, the rent is small enough for bosses to drink a pot without buying or selling for months. Only then have two more cost-saving sales models emerged, which can withstand the wind and rain and have a good mouth to carry goods live.

So I want to see, whether it's a stall or a live broadcast, both of them belong to the physical store subspecies that have not survived the epidemic.

The epidemic was a big wave, and the ship in the physical store didn't survive and fell apart. It is one thing to tear down the big boat on the spot and turn it into a stall and live broadcast. Turning a boat around is one thing, and the cost is more important than opening a shop.

On the other hand, the small boss who has survived the epidemic and is still opening a shop is either really strong enough; Either you have an obsession with physical stores; Or ... even if the business model can't set up a stall, you have to open a shop if you bite your teeth.

The catering industry is one of them. Yes, I'm talking about a restaurant with a small kitchen and its colleagues in this title. I read the whole article published by this hotel in Zhihu. Excuse me, I want to say something.

This group of catering bosses thought that this wave of epidemic rushed over and they could catch their breath.

Still young!

Richie Jen told you 20 years ago that it was a wave that had not subsided, and another wave came again.

In this big market, there is nothing but waves. And a top wave.

Capital wave, he cares about you. The epidemic is fierce and the flood is terrible. When he tried to shoot you, you couldn't hide.

Meituan, if it is really to let the shops in the topic play according to their rules of the game, otherwise there will be no preferential measures. I don't think this matter is particularly appropriate.

Admittedly, I have never opposed the phenomenon that capital pursues profits. Capital can exist in the world. This is his natural mission. If he eats fast, recites scriptures and gives porridge, then ... Wall Street should be full of temples by now.

I even have a monopoly on capital, which has been normal for 800 years.

Yes, in business, who doesn't want a unified business empire? Isn't this the ultimate dream of business?

But, listen, this but! Whether capital tries to monopolize or chase profits, it depends on its own ability, not on the office zz, so as to actually control the downstream and decide its head with its ass!

Apple Android came out, leaving Saipan's ashes. Does anyone sympathize with Nokia? No. It just doesn't work! How sweet are IOS and Android?

This is the skill.

How many people have nothing to send text messages when WeChat comes out? Do you call less? These are all big enterprises with national prefix. Does anyone complain? No, either. Wechat won their market because it is really convenient to use!

This is all about the ability to eat market share.

I'm vulgar, so I'll buy a cloth for the people. Whoever has a good product will save me money and use it.

If the US delegation says that it can rely on technical means to speed up food delivery, improve the driving safety of takeaway brother, or reduce the cost of merchants and users, and then he takes over the market, I am the first to stand up and applaud.

But he took the administrative route, letting the store do things according to the script, or pinching your eyes if you don't choose, which ... is a bit indecent.

Thanks to the shopkeeper's reputation in Zhihu, you and I can see it. You know, the educational level of most small catering bosses may not be KOL per capita. Will there be a shopkeeper who has been strangled for a long time and can't shout a word now? I don't know ...

I hope not. If this situation is common, it will be embarrassing!

On the other hand, let's just say that the user group that an enterprise faces is not the traditional industry practitioners with average educational level, but the editors of major media, or the shameless old Internet injector WIFI, and has developed a typesetting tool, such as!

Do you think he still dares to challenge users like this?

Not necessarily dare. Otherwise, after half an hour, it will definitely be smashed into a honeycomb briquette by our online keyboard hero. ...

If I had known, I would have taken the working people as an example and answered Chen Kun's lines: bully honest people?

Not appropriate.

Someone might have to talk about me. The platform is in line with the business. What's the matter with you? What can I do for you?

This is a terrible statement.

This kind of take-away platform has a special commercial chain and a high degree of regional locking. It is a chain composed of users, takeaway brothers, catering industry and platforms.

If this chain is monopolized by a certain strategy, I'm sorry. It has 100% bargaining power in the chain.

Although you look at it, you will always smile and say that I have provided you with quality service.

Instead, it squeezes the merchants and increases the proportion. Our customers can't see it, but we can eat it in rice.

The only monetary expenditure in this chain is us, and all the links in the chain are raised by us. Then once the business is pushed up by the monopoly enterprise, the business has to live, so at every meal, it begins to make ideas.

Or raise prices, which is the most direct way.

Or reduce the amount, the face is the most beautiful, but it really makes people hungry.

Or reduce the quality of ingredients. If it is too much, don't expect the quality of meat and vegetables. Maybe the gutter oil that disappeared just after the funeral in the past two years will be reborn again, which is not certain.

The customer is God, just like the emperor in the restaurant chain.

The owner is the chef of the royal chef, who provides food for the emperors.

Now I'm delivering food to the emperor's caterer in the chef's kitchen, and I've played a trick in the chef's kitchen, saying that you talented people had better join my camp, or there will be good fruit to eat!

When chefs are afraid, we are not good at talking. Join us! Then you say that the general manager will deduct the cook's salary in the future, and the cook will have to make plans for the emperor's meal if he can't live.

Finally, it was not the emperor himself who was unlucky for into the pit.

After this year's epidemic, even food and broadcast are not allowed, and everyone's eating habits are also advocated to embark on a healthy road. We all allow four dishes and one soup, so I changed two dishes and a glass of boiled water.

In this regard, the platform really should not cut in from the perspective of catering, and then increase the dining cost of comrades, or reduce the quality of catering in disguise ... This is not the opposite of what people want. ...