The first year of high school is divided into arts and sciences. Listen to what "a person who has experienced it" says.

The division of arts and sciences will gradually withdraw from the historical stage. In many places in China, the new college entrance examination scheme has been implemented, and the division of arts and sciences has been abolished. The division of arts and sciences has reduced the overall quality of the nation, China can't win the Nobel Prize, and the division of arts and sciences in high schools has led to a very important reason for the decline in personnel training level, and so on?

At present, most educators, scholars, some teachers and parents are opposed to the separation of arts and sciences. They think that the separation of arts and sciences makes science students stop studying politics, history, geography, and read literary classics less, which makes science students narrow in knowledge, resulting in a lack of humanistic spirit, and sometimes even do not understand basic literary common sense. For example, science students don't know who Balzac or Hugo is; At the same time, it also leads to the strangeness of arts students to physics, chemistry and biology, and the lack of basic natural knowledge, which leads to the lack of scientific thinking and scientific spirit. For example, some arts students do not know that light years represent length. The division of arts and sciences will hinder the all-round development of students and the improvement of their comprehensive quality. Some people even point out that the separation of arts and sciences will have a negative impact on the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation and regard it as a great cancer. ?

Our country has a history of more than 3 years. During this period, the education system and all walks of life have also argued many times about whether the senior high school should be divided into subjects, but in the end, the status quo has been maintained. The division of arts and sciences causes the students' knowledge structure to be imperfect and the students' burden to increase. First of all, we have to understand where the disadvantages of separating arts and sciences lie, and secondly, we have to seek solutions or solutions. The first drawback is that the premature division of subjects in middle school has caused the imperfection of knowledge structure, and the partial division of arts and sciences has more or less affected the formation of scientific spirit and humanistic spirit. On the other hand, for young people and high school students who are about to enter the university, their thinking may cause certain defects. We should advocate the cultivation of innovative talents now. Innovative talents are to perfectly combine the ability of thinking in images with the ability of thinking in abstractions, which is an important foundation for future achievements. ?

whether it is humanities, social sciences or natural sciences, innovative ideas can be solved by more than just one kind of thinking. We pay attention to some recent winners of the Nobel Prize in Economics, most of whom have a profound mathematical background, and use the current methods to solve traditional problems. This division of arts and sciences has an impact on the way of thinking. ?

there are obvious advantages in canceling the division of arts and sciences. First, expand the knowledge of candidates and better prepare for their future. I was admitted to the Chinese Department of Peking University under the system of arts and sciences. Later, I studied history. Although it was a strict liberal arts, because the research field involved economic history, the lack of math training left by arts and sciences has become a major obstacle to professional development, even though my math score in the college entrance examination was extremely high among liberal arts students. Many students in the classes before and after the Chinese Department, several of them have now become computer engineers or engaged in other jobs that require mathematics. From this perspective, the division of arts and sciences is irresponsible for the future of candidates and must be abolished. Second, give students more choices and make college entrance examination review more constructive. Under the condition of separating arts and sciences, candidates can only repeat their work and memorize in several classes. After the cancellation of the liberal arts division, if a candidate has to prepare ten courses, no one can repeat them endlessly in one course. Moreover, candidates who are weak in a certain course have more room to make up for their weaknesses with other strengths. Third, from the perspective of selecting talents, abolishing the division of arts and sciences is more conducive to selecting the best talents. ?

In today's world, knowledge is developing with each passing day, and knowledge has no frontiers. An important quality of candidates is whether they can absorb complicated knowledge in a short time. Therefore, the college entrance examination should create a world of knowledge for candidates, instead of turning them into frogs in the well, and select candidates who can learn everything and learn everything quickly. ?

? There are also many teachers and parents who are in favor of the division of arts and sciences. It is said that there is specialization in the industry, which can make students concentrate on the majors they are interested in and improve their interest in learning. Because in the high school stage, students' learning specialties and interest tendencies have already appeared. Some of them are good at liberal arts and some are good at science. According to their own characteristics and future development direction, students choose to focus on liberal arts or science, which is conducive to their concentration and lay the foundation for future development. ? There are fewer examination subjects to be dealt with in liberal arts and sciences. For students with partial subjects, they can choose their own good subjects to study, which can improve their enthusiasm for learning.