What about Panasonic and Fuji cameras? Let's talk about it

Panasonic is better than Fuji, and much better. Panasonic is a brand that can compete with Casio and Canon. Fuji is a little poor. Fuji sells well in China, mainly because its factory is in Suzhou, so the price is cheap.

If Fuji's image quality can be the best, I will give you all these points! As long as it can flow.

F200 has reverse film mode. It was special, but it's not like this anymore.

Since you want to understand photography, you should know that wide angle is much more important than telephoto. There are not many users with large zoom. Have you ever used a card machine?

Sony's CCD is better, and everything else is similar. If the CCD is large, the noise is small. Because of the CCD density, the real information of 1kw is actually five or six million. If the CCD is different, the definition is really much worse, not to mention the others. Fuji's superCCD noise reduction is actually very general, and it is all an algorithm. His advantage is mainly reflected in density. But now the reason why cameras are generally noisy is that the density is too high, so Fuji still suffers. Fuji's CCD was once a selling point, but now ......

Also, Lycra technology is not as good as Fuji Dragon, Lycra is a world brand, and Fuji Dragon takes a cost-effective route even in Japan.

Panasonic's workmanship is also relatively the best.

There are only three card machines that are good in all aspects, Casio's convenience, Panasonic's workmanship and Canon's reputation.

This is also the top three in the sales rankings of developed countries. Even in many cases, only three of the top ten are playing.

Off-topic, Fuji is ok after all, at least amateur brands like Bisogni are better, affordable, and the style is biased towards Yu Liyan, and the portrait processing card machine is the first. In addition, Fuji is a bit professional, Panasonic has just started, and Casio has broken the jar. Hmm. How interesting

Clarity is a relative concept. See how clear it can be. If it is 100%, please see clearly, hehe.

Dynamic is mainly to deal with the relationship between aperture and shutter, but also pay attention to the gap of anti-shake. It seems that Panasonic's anti-shake is the earliest. Of course, autofocus and scene selection are a little bit now, and autofocus is easy to be inaccurate at high speed.

That's all. You ask a lot.