Logical question: How is the true-false relationship of natural judgment drawn? What happened to the subject-predicate GAI? Who is the hero? Tell me more.

Let's talk about the subject-predicate of GAI.

Let me show you a watch:

Logical form of category judgment subject predicate

Full name affirmative judgment (1) SAP GAI is not GAI.

Negative evaluation of full name (E) SEP GAI GAI

A positive judgment (I) SIP is not GAI or GAI.

Specially called negative judgment (O) SOP No GAI GAI

The relationship between truth and falsehood in natural judgment;

I'll give you another form:

The truth of the same relationship is contained in the truth of the relationship, including the relationship, spanning the relationship, completely different.

Judge whether it is true or not.

E judge false false false false true

I judge whether it is true or not.

O judge the authenticity of fake goods

The true and false values of all attributes are judged according to the true and false values in the above table.

Do you understand? Hope to adopt