What are the advantages and disadvantages of mobile phone lifting camera? Is it easy to get into dust?

Advantages of mobile phone lifting camera: Mobile phone lifting camera has two main advantages. First of all, it enables the mobile phone to achieve a true full screen.

Second, the visual experience brought to people is better than Liu Haiping, water drop screen and perforated screen.

Mobile phone lifting camera disadvantages:

1 increases the thickness and weight of the mobile phone.

Take glory 9X as an example. Its thickness is 8.8 mm and its weight is 206 grams ... Compared with the thickness and weight of other Liu Haiping and drip screen phones, it is a bit clumsy. This is because the mechanical structure of the lifting camera of the mobile phone occupies a large part of the space of the mobile phone, which also leads to the increase of thickness and weight.

2, the photo experience is average

Unlike pull-down screen and perforated screen cameras, mechanical structures do not need to be ejected. The use of the lifting camera requires the internal stepping motor to drive the mechanical structure to pop up the color head, which will be about 1 second slower than that of the ordinary mobile phone to open the front camera.

Although this second is neither long nor short, it does affect the experience to some extent. For example, if you suddenly want to take a selfie and capture a moment, lifting the camera may lead to missing this moment.

And because of the space of the module, the hardware configuration of the front camera is very general. Moreover, according to most consumers' comments, there is sound when the camera is turned on, and this sound will increase with the increase of usage frequency.

3. Life troubles

Stepper motors and mechanical structures have a certain life, and no one can tell how many times they can really rise and fall. As for how many times the manufacturer can cite it, it is only under the ideal conditions of the laboratory and is not applicable to reality. Therefore, many manufacturers have abandoned the design of lifting cameras and switched to perforated screens.

4. Dust problem

As the questioner said, dust is inevitable. Because the lifting camera moves back and forth during use, there is a lot of dust in the air, so the dust can easily enter the inside of the lifting camera. (A friend's Redmi K20 was not used everyday before, but still got a lot of dust. )

Although manufacturers thought of this problem, they also did some protection. However, this little protection is very small in front of dust. In the process of ejecting the camera, some dust will be ejected with the camera, but some will enter the interior. Although there is no damage to the camera caused by dust entering at present, there is no guarantee that it will not appear in the future.

Summary:

For a full-screen solution, lifting the camera is the wrong direction. The real full-screen solution still needs to evolve from Liu Haiping, dripping screen and digging screen to more advanced off-screen camera technology, and off-screen camera technology is the most perfect mobile phone full-screen solution.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of mobile phone lifting camera? Is it easy to get into dust? A fringe of bangs, a drop of water, a hollow gap, etc. It has destroyed the face value of a whole screen. So major manufacturers are trying to make up for this small gap, so there is a mobile phone lifting camera.

OPPO, VIVO, Xiaomi, Glory and other manufacturers have all produced lift cameras. I thought it was a trend, but now it seems that lifting cameras have not been recognized by most people in the market. To achieve a truly popular full screen, it may be the off-screen camera and off-screen sound technology that make the screen pop up without holes and lenses, which will be the future direction.

At present, most mobile phones still use bangs or hole-digging technology, and rarely use mobile phones to lift cameras. Although the lift camera has advantages, the most important thing is to maintain the integrity of the whole screen and bring the visual beauty of the face value. But the lift camera also has many disadvantages:

Of course, the lifting lens is an innovation to explore a truly comprehensive screen. Just as Apple's vice president admires the creativity of OPPO Find X's lift camera, it is precisely because of its many shortcomings that he also said that "Apple will never adopt this scheme."

Among the users who bought the lift lens mobile phone, it did reflect many problems, such as: the screen of the mobile phone looks good, but there are many sacrifices; It is deceptive that the lifting structure is not ash; The lifting lens is still a little crooked; The fuselage is heavy; It takes a week for the front lens to rise and fall; Irregular jitter, red screen and so on.

Lifting lens is a beneficial innovation attempt, and it is precisely because of many shortcomings that it cannot be adopted on a large scale.

Please pay attention to "Dongfeng Levin" for more sharing.

I may be a little disappointed. Strictly speaking, I personally don't think the lift camera has any advantages, but I can cite several disadvantages. The lift camera is designed with a gap, which is of course very easy to dust. Why is there no advantage in lifting cameras?

In fact, careful observation reveals that there are few physical lifting cameras in flagship machine now, because there are too many defects in this design, which is not suitable for long-term use. However, in order to make the screen ratio higher, manufacturers have no choice but to use this relatively "old-fashioned" scheme for the time being. In fact, everyone's wishes are understood by manufacturers, but it is impossible to do so with the current technology.

Although some manufacturers were preaching the benefits of this design at first, it was actually nine Niu Yi cents. According to the new machines released on the market now, many brands don't want to use this scheme. In particular, the new machines to be launched in the past 20 years seem to have been completely abandoned, and all of them have invested in the punching scheme (which is also over-designed). As an over-the-stage design, the vitality of the lift camera is not even as good as that of bangs and water drops.

In addition to increasing the screen ratio of mobile phones, it seems really difficult to find too many advantages, but there are too many disadvantages. The first is the life of this design, whether it is worried about normal use or external damage. Secondly, it will increase the weight of the mobile phone. It can also be seen that the weight of machines using this design almost exceeds 200g, which greatly affects the user experience. Then there is the phenomenon that the subject said is easy to get into the dust. Users who have used it for a year may have the most say. Anyway, my useless one has dust.

Let's talk about the specific experience. Personal heavy experience product is Redmi K20Pro, and then OPPO, VIVO and glory models are also tried out. Generally speaking, people feel very vulnerable, especially in video, and they are very afraid of being hit. In addition, vertical speed can't meet personal requirements. Although the manufacturer claims that its expansion speed is very fast, it is not ideal after actual use. If you like to take selfies often, I think bangs and water droplets are more practical.

Perhaps the view is incorrect, but it is true from personal experience. Of course, if you just want to increase the screen ratio, it is acceptable to compromise, but it is definitely not the best solution!

It is inevitable that the mechanical structure is easy to accumulate dust, but most of the dust will stay on the top of the camera and can be wiped off when it stretches out, and a small amount will enter the fuselage. Of course, mobile phone manufacturers have already prepared for dust-proof design internally. At present, the technology of lifting the camera on the mobile phone is very mature, and the mobile phone will not malfunction due to dust.

After all, there is a speaker-like hole in the bottom of your mobile phone, and there is a dustproof net inside, but can it be 100% dustproof? Some designs are designed to prolong the service life, not 100% to solve the problem.

Let's talk about the disadvantages of the lift camera first. It takes up a lot of space in the fuselage, so the mobile phone will be thicker than other types of mobile phones, and then you have to wait for one second at most when taking a selfie. In fact, this is not a shortcoming, after all, it is also very interesting to rise; There will be a sound when lifting, and there is no mobile phone with completely silent lifting design at present; The space problem of the lifting module leads to the general active hardware, but it has little effect. If it's perfect, it's best to choose Mito's big forehead.

Advantages: true full-screen effect, no bangs and no water droplets, and better visual effect; More sci-fi. The key is the former. After all, this design is over-designed, in order to achieve a truly comprehensive screen.

Is the lift camera easy to break down? I really haven't heard of this kind of broken design. If it breaks down during maintenance, it will definitely be difficult to repair. Vivo once made a video, in which several nex's stood out from the front supporting glass, and a beautiful woman could dance on it. The quality is fine, because it is usually hidden inside, how can it bump? Unless you reach out and do it on purpose, any kind of design is not good.

Some people say that when you fall to the ground, the mobile phone that holds up the camera has a drop detection, and it will reach back when you fall. Don't worry.

Lifting camera is the mainstream design scheme at present, which is developed to cater to the full screen. Because many manufacturers are now using the "water drop screen", the front of the mobile phone loses its beauty, especially for patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, so lift camera came into being.

Personally, I think the advantage of the lift camera is that it does not destroy the integrity and aesthetics of the front screen of the mobile phone. As for other advantages, does it count to prevent the software from automatically opening the front camera?

The disadvantage of this design is very obvious. First of all, the failure rate is improved, because the lifting camera is a mechanical structure, the failure rate is much lower than that of the traditional flat-panel camera, and the maintenance cost is relatively high.

Secondly, lifting cameras are prone to dust. As mentioned above, this mechanical design will have a certain gap no matter how it is designed. After a period of use, it will inevitably become gray. I have experienced Nex in a physical store before, and I have consulted the clerk about this situation. The clerk didn't shy away from saying this shortcoming, so it is inevitable to enter the dust, but because of the habit of use, it is impossible to have no dust.

Finally, the elevator camera got stuck. When there is a bug in the system or software, the front camera has a certain chance of not being restored. Generally speaking, if the phone is dropped, it just falls on the front camera, so don't think about it. Basically, you need to replace the front camera. Although this coincidence is rare, it cannot be completely avoided.

Personally, I think there are so many advantages and disadvantages of lift cameras for reference only. I am a little spicy, and I love digital technology. Welcome attention.

Personally, the advantage is that it will not destroy the overall design sense of the mobile phone. Both the screen and the whole mobile phone look more beautiful, which can enhance the value of the mobile phone to a certain extent.

However, the shortcomings of the lift camera are also obvious. Take Nex as an example. Although Nex has a high praise rate, it is obvious that most of the problems in the bad reviews are concentrated on the lifting camera. Mainly "it is particularly easy to stick dust", "the camera can't pop up" and "there is irregular jitter after the camera rises".

First of all, the internal space of the mobile phone is extremely limited, and the lifting module occupies a lot of internal space, which leads to many functions being castrated, such as NFC, which is still very useful for many people, at least for me, such as going home, going to work and taking the bus and subway. I used to bring at least three cards every day. If I'm going to travel far away, I may bring my credit card and bank card in case of emergency. Now I only have one mobile phone.

Secondly, there must be a gap when there is mechanical sliding, even if the gap is small, the possibility of entering dust is definitely higher than that of traditional cameras, which is inevitable. The failure rate of lift camera is also significantly higher than that of traditional camera. Mechanical failure may occur after long-term use, resulting in the camera not being able to eject and retract normally. Moreover, the mobile phone will inevitably fall off during use. If the camera of the mobile phone pops up, it is more likely to be broken. Of course, these are all questions of probability. If your preference for lifting the camera is far higher than the risk caused by the failure rate, don't hesitate to start.

In addition, the camera will pop up from time to time when some users are using some apps. This is because these apps will "secretly" call the camera during use. Although everyone ridiculed the elevator camera as an artifact to detect "rogue software", this "unexpected operation" will still make people feel very annoyed over time. If it is commonly used software such as Alipay and WeChat, it will not be uninstalled even if the camera is secretly called.

In addition to these hard shortcomings, soft shortcomings are also obvious, but the front is pop-up. After all, most people use the front camera less. If the front and rear cameras are pop-ups, it will be very cumbersome to use them for a long time. Although the camera pops up quickly and won't take too long, it is an extra process after all. People nowadays like simplicity and quickness, and they can't wait to operate their mobile phones with their eyes. If they use the lift camera frequently, it will inevitably be boring.

It is hard to say whether it is easy to get into the dust, but it is certain that the probability will increase with the passage of time and the increase of usage frequency. What are the advantages and disadvantages of a lift camera?

Advantages: it realizes a real full screen, perfectly solves the problem of front camera on the screen, and to put it bluntly, I don't think this design is cool to use.

Disadvantages, although it is said that how many lifting experiments have explained its life, but who can say for sure? It will take time to prove that the failure rate of the channel is definitely higher than that of the fixed mode. With the increasing usage, even the best sealing performance will be reduced, so it will inevitably enter the dust, and the waterproof performance is worth the test of time. There are also issues that consumers are more concerned about. If it is damaged, will the maintenance cost be high? I don't think it should be too low

In fact, with the development of science and technology, manufacturers are also racking their brains to overcome the full screen, but there are advantages and disadvantages. Whether such progress is more convenient and practical in real life remains to be considered.

Because there are not many opportunities to take selfies, I have not taken many photos before, and. As long as you pay more attention. There shouldn't be that much ash.

After all, the mobile phone is the longest time we spend with each other in a day, so it is necessary to maintain it regularly.

In fact, we say that the lift camera is actually the best solution for full screen at present. The reason is that the technology of flat-panel camera is not mature enough at present. For example, flat-panel cameras can, but Samsung's A-screen transmittance is still not up to standard. It is understood that in order to achieve flat-panel cameras, Samsung's A-screen transmittance must reach at least 80%, while the current Samsung screen can only achieve about 40%.

We say that the pop-up camera can actually solve the problem of the front camera, and at the same time, with Samsung's cop packaging technology, it can maximize the full-screen effect. Of course, we say that many people also have questions about the lift camera, such as the number of times of use, the safety of falling, and whether it will accumulate dust.

First of all, in terms of the number of uses, don't worry about this. Generally, the number of uses given by large manufacturers is hundreds of thousands, which can meet the use time of several years. At the same time, the safety is also very up to standard, and it can even be used for bottle caps. As for the opportunity, we say that the waterproof and dustproof of mobile phones have actually been done well, but it is still difficult to avoid a small amount of dust immersion, so it will not affect the user's operating experience on the whole.

At the same time, we said that under this design specification, the most eye-catching thing this year actually belongs to vivo x27. With the pop-up design of vivo x27 series, the chin width is further reduced, which means that it is more extreme than the full-screen look and feel of vivo nex.

At the same time, in terms of absolute performance, the high-speed 7 10 processor, ufs2. 1 flash memory specifications, and the optimization ability of vivo at the system level, including comprehensive experience, are not too big problems.

The camera level adopts Sony Imx586 sensor, and it has super wide-angle lens and depth-of-field lens at the same time, so the comprehensive camera ability is quite good. In the past two years, the tuning of vivo on the camera has reached the top flagship level, whether it is complex ambient light or night scene mode. The performance is remarkable.

At the same time, the core competitiveness of vivo lies in the level of front camera. We know that this mobile phone is equipped with a 32-megapixel front lens, which can provide users with the most natural light sense with soft light and light band fill light. The effect is good!

On the battery life level, this phone is equipped with a battery capacity of 4000 mAh. At the same time, with the flash charging of vivo, it can quickly replenish the battery for the mobile phone, and even make it light up quickly.

At the game level, the supported multi-turbo technologies are Center-Turbo AI-Turbo Net-Turbo Cooling-Turbo Game-Turbo. At the same time, it also passed the extreme environment test of KPL the glory of the king Professional League, which means that this mobile phone is also very powerful at the game level.

On the whole, this mobile phone has the ultimate feeling of full screen, and at the same time it has the top level in taking pictures, and the game can also rival the e-sports mobile phone. It can be regarded as the best example of a full-screen solution for lifting cameras.

I have an upgraded active mobile phone, which has been used for more than half a year and no dust has been found.

Disadvantages? It's too heavy to carry.

The advantage is that the screen is complete except for the R angle, and it looks more accustomed to it. You don't have to get used to special-shaped screens such as water droplets digging holes.