And when a strong man dies, he becomes famous. What kind of prince will it be? What is the profound ideological connotation of this sentence?

"The princes will be in the same position, which is better or worse?" - -

This is a problem. But it implies a negative content that everyone agrees with. "Princes and princes will meet, which one would you rather have?" -Answer: No! "Princes and princes" should have no "seeds".

How many hot-blooded men have been inspired since this sentence was put forward. More importantly, how much just courage and confidence have been added to those who are careless.

Not only did the mountain kings rob their homes, but they took this sentence to kill and set fire to the mountain for the king; Even former revolutionaries used this as a slogan and called for rebellion. The most famous person in modern times is Sun Yat-sen. Others include, for example, and.

There is nothing wrong with this sentence. If we trace back to the human history of China, we can sadly find that this world is indeed a world of "princes and princes" and "seeds". How to understand this sentence? In other words, thousands of years of human history in China have recorded a feudal hierarchical society. This society uses rules, systems and laws to define the differences between people. And this difference is not caused by the intelligence between people, but by the class you belong to.

As a result, a group of "Buyi" with smart minds began to feel uneasy about their social status. Their belief is that people's wealth should be determined by their wisdom and hard work, not by their origin, class and status. So they began to resist and rebel. They put forward a slogan, that is, "princes and princes will meet, so I would rather have seeds"? Bobby Chen and Guangwu, who put forward this slogan, may be farmers with little advanced culture. However, because of its deep-rooted and irreplaceable historical role, this sentence has been carried forward, inherited and developed by countless people with culture, "Buyi" class, wisdom and thought.

This sentence still has his influence today and still plays an irreplaceable role. We should re-plan the differences and differences between good people and good people with systems and laws. So that the differences between people are no longer graded because of class differences.

In fact, there is another solution to this sentence. That is, "princes and princes will be alike, and they would rather have seeds"? This is a problem. If only as a question to answer, then there are two answers to this question:

Answer 1: "princes and princes will be together. Why not have seeds?" ? -Is there? Answer: No! This coincides with what we just discussed. Let's leave him alone.

Answer 2: "The prince and the prince will be very similar, so which would you rather have?" -Is there? Answer: Yes! This answer is far from what we just said. But this answer is one of the possible answers to that question, which is also true.

For thousands of years, people are more willing to talk about the first answer. It seems that only this answer is correct. I said, this is not right. The second answer is the same as the correct answer to this question.

"Princes and princes will meet, which one would you rather have?" For thousands of years, people have been concerned about the composition of his class concept. It is often emphasized that the differences between people should not be determined by class and heredity, which is exactly what people oppose. There is nothing wrong with this book. But most people ignore another content, that is, the innate and innate intelligence differences between people. This difference in human intelligence is actually inherited by human beings. It can be said that a pair of spoony men and women, can you just hope that they will give birth to a child as smart as Einstein?

So an ordinary person is doomed to be different from others. And this difference can probably be traced back to his previous generation or more. In this sense, "princes and princes will be alike, so which would you rather have?" -Yes! This answer is correct.

In fact, discussing this issue is more about letting us recognize ourselves.

Once people are dissatisfied with reality, want to rebel, want to destroy, want to ... they will find various reasons to defend their actions. The most direct and simple is this sentence. It's like when you say, "princes and princes will be alike, why not have balls?" Everything is created for a reason; It seems that even the sky can poke a big hole; It seems that you can break all the rules. ...

"The princes will be in the same position, which is better or worse?" Don't! That's for sure. There should be no class differences between people, so this answer is correct.

"The princes will be in the same position, which is better or worse?" -Yes! That's for sure. The difference between people is the difference between intelligence and hard work, which is also innate (but can be changed the day after tomorrow).

These two different answers to the same question seem contradictory, but they are not. These two answers are two different aspects of this question, and there must be different answers. If there is only one answer to these two different aspects, it is really a ghost!