Who has a better chance of winning in fencing or fencing in China?

If fencing is compared with fencing in China, fencing is slightly better than fencing in China. Let's talk about fencing first Fencing is divided into foil, sabre and epee. Fencing is a thin sword, but it can't be used in the battlefield, because it is too thin and easy to be broken and cut off by the opponent. Its main function is for one-on-one combat, because it is lighter, so it is easier to master.

Fencing is fast, but the damage is small. If you are injured, the wound is small and the suture is very convenient. Fencing is basically useless if the enemy wears armor on the battlefield. China has a long history of fencing. It appeared in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period. During the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, countries fought in successive years, so there was fencing in China, and there were many tricks in fencing in China. At first, China fenced to kill the enemy by picking and stabbing. Later, after a little improvement and a little integration, it became possible to kill the enemy by chopping, stabbing, cutting, rubbing, picking and twisting.

If we look closely, we will find that fencing is a straight line, while China fencing is an arc. When passing through these circles, there are many attack angles. Although not as fast as fencing, it's hard to guess, because you never know where it will hit you next time. Like fencing, one hand can know where its attack route is, but China fencing just doesn't understand it.

The main attack part of fencing in China is the wrist, because the main attack part of fencing in China is the wrist, so if the whole wrist is protected, it is not easy to get hurt. We all know that the fencing compartment is hemispherical in shape, and this hemisphere protects the whole wrist inside, so fencing will have a slight advantage when fencing against China.