After Starbucks drove away the police, the crowd threw white flowers and eggs at the door. Is this kind of emotional expression too much?

It's a bit too much, and you can resist it rationally, but there's no need to make such an insult.

The police in the regiment often solve the problems of eating on the spot, eating in the snow and eating by the river. As long as they find a flat place, they can quickly finish what may be their only meal of the day.

Recently, Starbucks went on a hot search because it drove away the police who ate at the door of the store, which set off a nationwide boycott of Starbucks. Things are getting worse and worse. Some people even went to the restaurant to throw rotten eggs, send white flowers, and even cleaners tried to clean them.

What Starbucks has done is abhorrent, but individual violence is not desirable.

On February 13, at the gate of a Starbucks in Chongqing, there were several policemen eating lunch boxes. Starbucks employees saw it and drove the police away on the grounds that it would affect the brand image. That's not all. They also complained to the police.

After the incident was exposed, it immediately caused an uproar on the Internet. Everyone says Starbucks is too arrogant. Why do you want to drive away the police who eat? Although they occupied the tables and chairs that Starbucks put outdoors, they also cleaned them up when they left. How can having a meal in front of your store affect your brand image? What is your brand image? To make matters worse, the Starbucks also complained about these policemen, leaving no room for further development.

As this incident became more and more serious on the Internet, netizens expressed their desire to boycott Starbucks. Although Starbucks issued a so-called apology statement, its words were evasive and it didn't realize its mistake at all.

Netizens can't stand it. What's the big deal about your Starbucks? You will never go to Starbucks again after treating us like this.

Not only that, netizens from all over the world also went to Starbucks to observe and be satisfied when they saw that the store was deserted. Anyway, everyone's resistance is unbreakable, and no one will go to Starbucks for consumption.

If so, the store in Chongqing was pulled out, and then the store suffered the above-mentioned social death moment, and someone threw white eggs directly at the door of the store.

These operations remind me of the scene of smashing Japanese cars. The so-called patriotism developed to an irrational level, and then damaged other people's property. If this behavior of throwing white eggs in front of Starbucks continues to develop, should it reach the point of smashing the store? If that's the case, what's the difference between us and those American thugs who deliberately rob and smash stores?

If you don't like this store and the culture of this brand, we can resist it, but be rational.

It's nice to see a group of old people sitting in front of Starbucks in the sun in recent days. Don't you affect the image of the store? If you have the ability, you can try one out and see the reaction of these uncles and aunts.