How to evaluate the movie King Kong?

The remake of classics is always a "double-edged sword".

With the version of 1933 and the version of 1976, which is considered as the most classic, how to break through the form of "Zhu Yu first" is the biggest problem in the 2005 edition of King Kong.

Compared with the previous films, the biggest breakthrough of this film lies in the shocking visual effects brought by the vigorous development of the film special effects industry. So it is not surprising that he won the Best Visual Effect Award at the 78th Academy Awards.

But for more than three hours, Del's wonderful and interesting story, grand and compact rhythm, is a concentrated explosion of whimsy accumulated by Peter Jackson, who was keen on King Kong since childhood.

It is undeniable that the 2005 version of King Kong still follows the traditional routine of classic action fantasy movies, but with the strong support of visual effects, the first half of the film is full of thrilling visual elements. It is worth mentioning that the film quite grasps the gradual emotional accumulation between King Kong and the heroine, which is better than 1933 and 1976.

Too much pursuit of sincere emotional cultivation between King Kong and the heroine, more details and redundant bedding make the emotional drama of this film seem tedious, which directly affects the climax of the second half. This plot pot should be memorized by both writers and directors. After all, ignoring the logical relationship and rhythm of the whole movie, even if there are more special effects to support it, it will not help.

Finally, whether it's King Kong, who is powerful and has no lack of humanity, or Godzilla, who can destroy the city with one hand, the ferocity and coldness, blood and feelings of monsters can't compare with human beings.

I will never forget the suspicious, fearful and helpless eyes when King Kong collapsed.

The cruelest thing on earth is human beings.