≡ Grade II Composition Go to Goose Lake College.

It was spring, and the vegetation was thriving and lush everywhere. I went to Shangrao, Jiangxi, found a private van, and I rushed to Goose Lake Academy.

Ehu Academy is located at the northern foot of Ehu Mountain in Yanshan County. The mountain is a branch of Wuyi, named after the Goose Lake on the mountain. Hundreds of years of wind and rain have given the academy a general color of ink painting. So as soon as we entered the Academy of Fine Arts, we saw three or five groups of art students in the Academy sketching, sketching, watercolor painting and oil painting. These western painting techniques collided with the ink painting school, and I was drunk.

The name of Ehu Academy originated from an academic debate between Zhu and Lu Jiuyuan, representatives of two philosophical schools in the Southern Song Dynasty, and was called "the meeting of Ehu". During the Southern Song Dynasty, Confucian scholars gave lectures and developed academies. Zhu, 1 130, from Wuyuan, Jiangxi. Prior to this, Cheng (Cheng Hao, Cheng Yi) and Wang (An Shi) learned several times, but in the Southern Song Dynasty, academic restrictions were lifted, and scholars were not limited to learning. Zhu absorbed the theories of Zhou Dunyi, Er Cheng, Zhang Zai and the philosophers of the Northern Song Dynasty and became a master of Neo-Confucianism. Because the main part of his theory is directly following the second route, later generations often call Cheng and Zhu as "Cheng-Zhu Neo-Confucianism". Zhu doesn't have a high position in politics, but he has a wide academic influence. As a learned scholar, Zhu's works cover many fields such as philosophy, history, literature and education. In terms of cosmology and methodology, his view belongs to objective idealism. Lu Jiuyuan is from Fuzhou, Jiangxi. Xiao Zhu is 9 years old. He is a scholar, his official position is not prominent, and he has no academic research. He gave lectures and became a believer in Bailudong, integrated Mencius' theory with Zen, and independently formed a school opposite to Zhu, nicknamed "Xin Xue". In terms of cosmology and methodology, his view belongs to subjective idealism. After the founding of the People's Republic of China, Xue Lu stood side by side with Zhu Xue. So, in two years (1 175), Zhu and Lu Jiuyuan met and went to the Ehu Temple (built in the Tang Dynasty) to argue. Goose Lake is the only place where Jiangxi passes through the ancient post road to Lin 'an, with convenient transportation. Many participants, including Lu Jiuyuan's brother Lu Jiuling and Lv Zuqian from eastern Zhejiang, took part in the debate. At the Goose Lake Meeting for more than ten days, Zhu and Lu debated for three days, and had a face-to-face debate on moral realm, moral education and cultivation methods. Zhu and Lu adhere to the ideas of "Prophet before Meaning" and "Meaning before Fool" respectively. The two sides always disagreed, and the atmosphere of the debate was warm and tense. Although it has been discussed several times, each has its own views and is ultimately inconsistent.

On the way home after the "Goose Lake Meeting", Zhu wrote a five-character quatrain "The Feeling of Crossing the Watershed":

The terrain has no north and south, and the water flows west to east.

If you want to know the differences, you should know the similarities.

Zhu expressed the philosophy of "seeking common ground while reserving differences" with the scene of water and flow separation. Open-minded, open-minded, a generation of scholars, respect others.

The differences in academic thoughts did not affect the friendship between the masters. After the Goose Lake meeting, they continued to discuss academic issues through letters. In the eighth year of Xichun (1 18 1), Zhu invited Lu Jiuyuan to give a lecture at Bailudong Academy. Lu Jiuyuan talked about "the debate between righteousness and benefit" in the academy, and Zhu Dajia appreciated it. He thought that Lu Jiuyuan's words "hit the scholar's hidden disease". When Zhu left the meeting, he said, "Xi should be with all the students so as not to forget the teacher's training." Zhu also felt "guilty" because he "never said anything here".

Different from the contention of a hundred schools of thought in the pre-Qin period, the "Goose Lake Conference" has the characteristics of modern academic debate. On the basis of various "similarities" proposed by Huang Zongxi, it is creative and constructive to explore the truth through debate. Lu Jiuyuan is not afraid of innovation just because Zhu Xue is famous. As far as the theory is objective and subjective, Xue Lu is farther from the truth than Zhu Xue. However, the significance of competition itself is higher than the value of its content. Without contention, it is difficult to make a leap in academic level. Similarly, Zhu did not engage in academic repression because of his long-standing reputation for his theory, but actively responded to challenges and improved his academic views in contention. Although the second academic exchange is not as famous as the "Goose Lake Conference", it is an excellent proof that Zhu and Lu have always debated in an atmosphere of equal dialogue and expounded their views meticulously and tirelessly.

The people of Sri Lanka have gone far away, and the profound significance of the "Goose Lake Conference" and its academic tradition may vary. From 65438 to 0957, the Academy became a cultural relic protection unit in Jiangxi Province. Managers always told people that the archway engraved with the words "Gentle Patriarch" has asymmetric characteristics, which symbolizes Zhu Lu and his two families' understanding and recognition of seeking common ground while reserving differences. Now standing in front of this archway, while walking, I look at the text and image introduction, leaving only the words of Zhujiajian, with few traces of Lu Jiuyuan. I think, even though Lu Jiuyuan's academic contribution is negligible, as far as the preservation of the remains of the Goose Lake Academy is concerned, he has an irreplaceable position as a party of the "Goose Lake Club", even though his statement now seems ridiculous.

In contrast, in the contemporary literary, educational and scientific circles, as well as many other fields, there is a lack of basic academic contention. For example, literary criticism, which has been radiant in China's literary history, is now silent. Literary creation is basically left to fend for itself, with occasional disputes, but a closer look is a matter of opinion. It is modern schools that have replaced colleges. Is there still academic contention in colleges and universities? In other words, ten years of quality education has smoothed out our unruly, leaving only Nuo Nuo passive.

Without argument, there will be no freedom of literature and art. Then, when will the "Goose Lake Fair" reappear?