What will Lenovo eventually face?

Personally, Lenovo is a microcosm of China's reform and development ... There are certain tolerance conditions for making mistakes. At that time, the miniaturization and privatization of state-owned assets was a groping process, and it was time to cross the river by feeling the stones. Due to the lack of specific policies, there will inevitably be crimes occupied by collectives and individuals ... It is hard to understand whether this can be forgiven today ... Only when the state and the current government come forward can we make it clear ... With the deepening of reform and opening up, it has been decades from the outside, and the brilliant achievements have made China rise to the forefront of the world. Therefore, with the development of media and information, personal media has an unprecedented development space. At any time, you can send yourself to the society on your own platform and fans, investigate some social hotspots and express your personal opinions ... So, take out Lenovo's original sin and talk about the problems that appear now, so that everyone can discuss it openly, openly and fairly ... It is not necessarily a bad thing to bask in the sun and let the new generation know how China's predecessors got rich. Whether it is right or wrong has its own public opinion and legal judgment. The government and the state will definitely give some people who encroached on state-owned assets in the early days of reform and opening up, as long as they didn't go into personal pockets, the assets stayed in the company, didn't become personal pawns, and entered the high-level and management groups ... most people and people can forgive them. However, the state-owned assets have all gone into personal pockets. No matter who they are, they must check the state-owned assets ... and make public announcements. This is a fair and open public evaluation ... the practice of serving the public and the whole people ... and letting the state-owned assets have a place to go ... This is the real purpose that the people want to know ...

Initiate a big discussion on class struggle, line struggle and social distribution system, and return to the socialist ideological line that puts people's interests first.

The first question Lenovo finally faced was: What about the lost state-owned assets? The first possibility is to let it slip away and muddle along; The second possibility is to partially restore the status quo; The third possibility is reasonable recovery and distinguishing right from wrong.

I hope to get the third possibility. State-owned assets are the foundation of our country. We can't let them run away, we can only let them consolidate and grow. Therefore, on the basis of fully understanding the historical reasons, it is necessary to clarify the right and wrong, that is, to distinguish right from wrong. As long as the lost state-owned assets can be returned reasonably, the investors can withdraw from the state-owned assets and their income, and the merits and demerits are balanced.

The second problem Lenovo will eventually face is: how to contribute to the prosperity of its compatriots.

We have handled the first question well, and we have a foundation and confidence in the face of the second question. If we can't handle the first problem properly, I'm afraid it will be eliminated by the country's policy of achieving prosperity.

We hope that for common prosperity, everyone is responsible. Under the policy system of "some people get rich first", those who get rich first are even more duty-bound!

The world is bustling for profit! Birds die for money! Lenovo or Lenovo executives pursue profits, which is in line with human nature and the company's mission!

However, a gentleman loves money and takes it wisely. I think the Lenovo executives questioned by Si Manan are "whether there is a proper way" and whether it is legal or not should be beyond the control of this "retired old man"

Lenovo is called a national enterprise, and Lenovo executives are called role models. Naturally, we regard them as "gentlemen", so we measure them as "gentlemen".

Si Manan is a mirror. If there is any change, it will encourage and respond generously to the questions!

Si Manan's questioning today is questioning the management values of a national enterprise and an "entrepreneur", and it is also questioning those of us who have been educated for many years. We are all "Si Manan"!

Who bears the responsibility, the enterprise itself is not guilty. Finding out the rights and interests of assets is the key, so there is no need to repay the bank loan business. The purpose of state-owned assets reorganization is the same as loans. Preserve and increase the value, and prevent the loss or depreciation of assets. State-owned assets are not Tang monk meat.

If what Si Manan said is true, Lenovo will probably come to the end of bankruptcy liquidation.

The altar in people's hearts collapsed! The disillusionment of myth in the face of reality! ..... What a tragedy! What else can people believe? ! ……

This is not what Lenovo will eventually face. This is a question of what all enterprises in China will eventually face.

Looking back, there is a public opinion that China FAW spent "huge sums of money" to develop Hongqi brand cars. Later, there was a "discussion" about whether Maotai liquor company or technology company was needed, attacking China liquor enterprises. Not long ago, Evergrande Real Estate Company was taken out for torture, and now someone has created a big crisis of Lenovo's public opinion. All this has caused a storm of public opinion against famous big enterprises in China. It is hard to say which enterprises will be found out by the so-called "justice" media in the future. Facing the crisis of public opinion, it's hard to say.

This is a critical moment in the global fight against the epidemic. Supporting enterprise management, developing economy and ensuring employment are the most important tasks at present. It is equally important to create a good business environment for the super-large enterprises in China. The business activities of enterprises are naturally regulated by national laws and regulations. If they are derailed, they should also report to the relevant departments and be handled by law enforcement departments, instead of using public opinion to discredit the company to win traffic and build "justice" for themselves. I can't think of any benefits they will bring to the country, enterprises and employment security at this critical point in the fight against the epidemic. Should all the super-large enterprises in our country carry out a historic "cleaning" during this period? Must their business activities be regulated according to this person's public opinion? There are no requirements of any laws and regulations! The assets of an enterprise also include the value of goodwill assets, which can be several times more than its actual assets. The so-called insolvency, if you count the goodwill value of Lenovo, Evergrande and Maotai, its assets are far greater than its debts, which is the law of economic operation. Some people set off a storm of public opinion against enterprise management, which will inevitably lead to the substantial and destructive depreciation of the "goodwill value" of related enterprises, and its products will inevitably have an impact on the market. Enterprises can't survive, national tax revenue is lost, and employees are unemployed. I don't think anyone will be happy! I hope that those who are "tongue-tied" will return to the legal system and report problems to the public, instead of publicly releasing the storm of public opinion that "criticizes" business activities.