Have any former top students told me whether to give a lecture to the "poor students"?

I thought that when I was in high school, I was at least a partial scientist, although I couldn't say how excellent my grades were. Because my English and chemistry scores are particularly good. So it also made me among the best, and I never fell out of the top ten in my class. When I was at school, I was more lively and mingled with the class. Even the poor students mentioned by the teacher, we all played very well. Have you ever been the top student in your class? Would you like to give a lecture to poor students? Welcome to share your opinion at the bottom of the comment section.

First, I am willing to give lectures to poor students.

In the three years of high school, the class ranking has never fallen out of the top ten of the class. In the eyes of teachers, I am a standard top student, but I am different from other students who study well. I don't exclude students who don't study well in class, but mingle with them, so when they come to me with their homework, I will explain it to them enthusiastically. I think it is appropriate for students to talk about topics, and they will not have a sense of superiority just because they study well.

Second, helping students with poor grades is actually improving themselves.

As long as it's not class time, I will explain patiently when my classmates ask me questions in the rest of the time. I think there is a very important reason besides that we are classmates, that is, giving lectures to students with poor grades is actually a disguised way to improve themselves, because the problems they can't solve are basically basic problems. When we explain the topic, we can also help ourselves to consolidate the basic knowledge. I believe that all students who study well have the same experience, that is, we must firmly grasp the foundation. Strong basic knowledge is the same characteristic of top students. So while helping my classmates, I also improved myself. Why not?

Third, there should be no distinction between top students and poor students.

In fact, in my heart, I don't like the words "top students" and "poor students" very much, because top students will give people a feeling of complacency, while poor students will hurt students' self-confidence. I think that when I was a student, I should pay attention to the development of students in other aspects besides studying. It doesn't mean that everything can't be done well in the future. It is a very one-sided practice to divide students into 369 grades according to their grades, and it is also a disrespect for the performance of students with poor grades. I think the teacher should cancel this name. In the teacher's mind, every student is treated equally, and there is no difference between poor students and excellent students. At the same time, teachers should pay more attention to the lessons of students with poor academic performance. You can also arrange free tutoring for those with good academic performance and those with poor academic performance, which can form a better learning environment and enhance the feelings between classmates.