Tell me what you think of the new marriage law.

For the real estate problem that everyone is more concerned about, it is clear that after marriage, one parent contributes to the purchase of real estate for their children, and the property rights registered in the children's names should be recognized as the personal property of the husband and wife. For the first time in the Interpretation, it is clear that the property purchased by one party in a divorce case should be owned by the property registration party. For the party who participates in the loan after marriage, in line with the principle of taking care of the rights and interests of children and women, the property registration party will compensate the other party at the time of divorce.

This judicial interpretation is cool! After that, the girls will keep an eye on finding someone. The man does not buy a house in full, and he will not marry for life! Because parents buy houses for their sons, the daughter-in-law has no share. The new judiciary explained that even if parents only pay the down payment and the daughter-in-law participates in repaying the loan after marriage, the divorced house has no daughter-in-law share! It's just that the man gives some financial compensation as appropriate! Similarly, those door-to-door sons-in-law, don't be silly, accompany the woman to repay the loan after marriage, and you don't have the ownership of this house after being swept out of the house.

The judicial interpretation of the Marriage Law also stipulates that if one party sells the house jointly owned by husband and wife without the consent of the other party, the third party buys it in good faith, pays a reasonable consideration and goes through the formalities of property right registration, and the other party claims to take back the house, the people's court will not support it. If one spouse arbitrarily disposes of the house jointly owned by * * * and * *, causing losses to the other spouse, and the other spouse requests compensation for the losses during the divorce, the people's court shall support it.

That is to say, if one spouse sells the house without knowing it, the uninformed spouse has no right to take back the house, and can only ask the husband or wife who sells the house for compensation. I don't know what the Supreme Law does. How many evils will this rule breed? How many families will be so stipulated that they will fall into a long war! This law is a loophole, which is likely to be used by people with ulterior motives. Those people whose houses have a good location and great value-added potential, but the owners don't know it, will eventually lose their wives or husbands or even a safe house!

The judicial interpretation of the Marriage Law also clearly stipulates that in the parent-child relationship litigation, one party refuses to authenticate, which will lead the court to infer the legal consequences advocated by the other party, and at the same time, it is clear that the fruits and natural appreciation of one spouse's personal property after marriage do not belong to the same property. The popular point of this explanation is that children, one party has evidence to prove that they are not biological, and the other party refuses paternity test and pushes the default. This provides help for children to find their fathers, which is worthy of recognition. But the other meaning is much colder, that is, it proves the existence of children born out of wedlock. That is to say, if the woman cheats and the man asks for a divorce, the woman will not be compensated for the value-added part of the house.

For example, when getting married, the house is worth 200,000 yuan, and the down payment is 60,000 yuan, which is paid by the man's parents. The mortgage and interest of 6.5438+0.4 million yuan after marriage shall be borne by the young couple. If it is found that the child is not his own after ten years, the man will only compensate the woman for a loan of 70,000 yuan and part of the interest. Even if the house is worth 2 million now, the woman can only look on with a blank stare. The woman's loyalty to marriage will be kidnapped into the house!

In addition, it is stipulated that if the parties fail to reach an agreement on divorce, the property division agreement reached in advance on the condition of divorce by agreement has no legal effect and does not take effect. The popular explanation is that in order to get rid of the promised "breakup fee", the court will not recognize it. A man's promise to give a house and a car a few years later, even if it is one million overnight, is unreliable as long as it is not fulfilled immediately. Even if there is a situation agreement, Xiao San wants to go to court, and the court does not support it! In other words, a real woman is like clothes, and there is nothing to worry about!

Article 9 of the Judicial Interpretation of Marriage Law stipulates that if a husband claims damages on the grounds that his wife terminates her pregnancy without authorization and infringes on her reproductive rights, the people's court will not support it; If a dispute between husband and wife over whether to have children leads to emotional breakdown, and one party requests a divorce, and mediation fails, the people's court shall handle it in accordance with the provisions of Item (5) of Paragraph 3 of Article 32 of the Marriage Law. The popular explanation is that the reproductive right stipulates that the woman has the initiative to have children, and the man can choose to divorce. This provision is entirely from the woman's point of view, and it is the only interpretation of this law to protect women's interests from the woman's point of view. When a woman is not a mother, she has complete autonomy.