Is it reasonable to say that "the third is harmed by the boss, and the last thing you want is the second"?

In the past, especially when family planning was imperfect, there were often many children in every household. These situations are often very common in rural areas. Basically, a family will have three or four children, so with the passage of time, many proverbs have been born. There is a saying called. Shit, it hurts the third one, and the last thing you want is the second one? Does this sentence make sense? In fact, there is some truth in this.

First: the first child cares more.

When a family welcomes its first baby, whether it is out of novelty or fear of making mistakes, it is often extremely cautious at this time and strives for perfection in every detail. Therefore, the first child is often very happy in this family. This is mainly because parents are inexperienced for the first time and are afraid that their children will have any accidents, so they will prefer the boss. And when the boss grows up, his parents have greater hopes for him.

Second: in contrast, the second child is not so concerned.

Because it is a second child and has enough experience, parents look more casual. But in fact, this is only because my parents have enough experience to do the second parenting, so they know how to choose between things and how to make a child grow up, so as to avoid unnecessary doting. Especially compared with the first child, it seems that the second child is unpopular.

Third: the third child is often what parents expect.

Generally speaking, if a family's Dabao and Bauer are already a man and a woman, the family will not have a third child. Families who often have a third child want a child of a different sex. Then, at this time, parents will be full of expectations for the third child, and the third child will be more favored after birth.