A gentleman can associate with a villain, but a villain cannot be a gentleman.

A gentleman can associate with a villain, and a villain cannot be among the gentlemen. "A gentleman can associate with a villain, and a villain cannot be among the gentlemen." It means that a gentleman can live in peace with a villain. It is difficult for a villain to live like a gentleman. "

Do you need a gentleman for a villain? If you are an official or a person in a shopping mall, under what circumstances should you do superficial work?

A friend of a gentleman-a friend of a villain. A friendship between gentlemen is as light as water, but a friendship between villains is as sweet as water.

Do gentlemen treat villains with the heart of villains or with the heart of gentlemen? When a gentleman treats a villain, it is neither "eating the belly of a gentleman with the heart of a villain" nor "eating the belly of a villain with the heart of a gentleman", but "eating the belly of a gentleman with the heart of a gentleman". Because gentlemen always think well of people, even villains don't treat people like villains. If a gentleman often treats others as villains, then such a gentleman may be the so-called gentleman.

There is no such thing as a friend of a gentleman.

The meaning, measurement, measurement and speculation of degree. Make friends.

Measure the mind of the villain by the way of gentleman's communication.

It is obviously illogical.

We often say

Measure the height of a great man by the standard of a small person.

Appropriate change

The correct statement should be

Treat the belly of a villain with a gentleman's heart

Character: a gentleman is a teacher of villains; A villain is a gentleman's capital. How to explain it? There is no difference between a gentleman who pretends to be kind and a villain who does all kinds of evil.

If a gentleman changes his honor,

His character is worse than a villain who resolutely repents and turns over a new leaf.

The villain and then the gentleman retired, without him, to replace virtue with talent, so it is also. Virtue is unique to a gentleman, a gentleman's villain, and then a gentleman retires. Without him, he replaced virtue with talent, so he also. Virtue, a gentleman is independent, a gentleman, a villain, and a villain wins. That's right, gentlemen are clumsy and villains are arrogant, so learn from your ears. Running around, a gentleman is clumsy, a villain is emperor, so you get used to your eyes. In other words, a gentleman is ashamed to say what he wants, while a villain is good at catering, diligent and devoted to his own mind. The villain is good at displaying his talents, and the master is addicted to what he has learned without knowing it. He listened to him, looked at him pleasing to the eye, and tried hard. So the villains happen to coincide, and the gentleman never leaves. As for the husband, the villain is United and the gentleman is separated, and its bitterness can win!

(Jia Ganzhi Ganlong's famous post)

I don't know if you are explaining this sentence or the whole text.

I'm looking for the full text: full text translation:

The villain is promoted, and the gentleman is not retired, not because of anything else, but because he should have used it instead of virtue. The so-called virtue, there must be a gentleman, but it is both a gentleman and a villain, and a villain will be better. In terms of speaking, doing things and answering questions, gentlemen are often plain, while villains are good at lifting their feet, which is in line with people's habit of listening to good words. In dealing with people, gentlemen are often clumsy and not good at it, but villains are flattering, which is also in line with people's eyes (like to see someone please). The villain is good at being liked by others by virtue of his own strengths, and his master is often addicted to it unconsciously. Listen carefully to what the villain says, and your ears are comfortable. A careful look at the villain will make his appearance pleasing to the eye, and a careful attempt will make him very satisfied with his talent. Therefore, without prior agreement, villains will automatically surround themselves, and gentlemen will automatically stay away from themselves without being expelled. How can such a disaster be expressed in words?

The difference between a friend of a gentleman and a friend of a villain is that you come to help you when you have something to do and he comes to you when he has something to do.

The friendship between gentlemen is indifferent, and the friendship between villains is sincere;

The friendship between gentlemen is not based on money or interests, but pure. The friendship between villains is like sweet wine, which is sweet on the surface but hypocritical in fact.

As the ancients said, gentlemen are harmonious but different, while villains are the same but not harmonious.

What is said is: a gentleman can maintain a harmonious relationship with the people around him, but he must have his own brain to think independently when dealing with anything, and never want to blindly agree with others; But I don't have my own opinions, I just want to be completely consistent with others, and I don't care about principles, but I can't maintain a harmonious and friendly relationship with others.

What does it mean to treat a gentleman with a gentleman's heart and a villain with a villain's way? Confucianism means "repay kindness with evil, complaining about others", and Buddhism means "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth". To put it bluntly, we should have different attitudes towards different people. When facing a gentleman, treat him as a gentleman, when facing a villain, treat him as a villain, and don't be polite to him.