Wang Yangming: "When you didn't see this flower, it died with you." What do you think of this sentence?

According to common sense, whether this flower exists or not, what does Wang Yangming mean by saying this? Some things in the world are not what we think, such as the Mandela effect. In 20 13, it was reported that Mandela had passed away. Everyone thought that Mandela had been dead for many years. I have this illusion. Some people say that our consciousness has entered a parallel universe, and the existing state of things in the two parallel universes will be different, and the existing state of this flower will be different because our conscious mind has come into contact with the so-called parallel universe. This is really great. A flower bloomed in the valley. What color is this flower?

There is also the problem of the blind, because you can see, so you think the objective world exists. If you are born blind, in his world, the world is empty. Suppose you say that the flower is red, he can't see the color and has no idea about it. Maybe in his world, red may be green, black or another substance. It's just that after you were born, people told you it was red, and you thought it would be red in the future. Suppose you are born and others tell you that trees are flowers, then you will think that trees are flowers in the future.

But the blind man didn't know it was a meal. Someone told him it was a meal. When he has never seen this meal, in the eyes of the blind, this meal does not exist, just a concept. Because the hearing of seeing is believing is empty, only when he really saw the meal did he know that it was a meal. It's like saying that your lover cheated on you. You can't see it, but you just doubt it. You won't believe it until you really have evidence and see photos or something. Sorry to give an inappropriate example.

Lao Wang said that I said this sentence is a simple metaphor. As a result, you have derived so much. I'm sure Comrade Lao Wang knows what's going on underground. He must look silly! Conscience comes first! There's nothing in the middle of the back! Finally, knowing and doing are one, and my heart is bright! If you can't do it, you just don't understand it, or you can't do it that simple.

The state of the thing itself will change because of the observer's self-cognition? You didn't know the color and dynamics of flowers until you saw them? Let me mention one thing. I didn't go to see the flowers myself, but I bought a camera to take pictures of them. I watched the video afterwards. Excuse me, was the flower seen by the camera or changed when watching the video? Please explain to god?

Personally a little rough thinking: First of all, many years ago, China really suppressed idealism and advocated materialism. Now we can peacefully realize that it is actually two sides of philosophy. Secondly, I think that among idealistic materialism, current materialism can better explain the world. Third, there is a saying that what can be proved is science and what has not been proved is philosophy. There have been so many schools of philosophy, all of which are great wise men who try to explain the world, defend themselves and create theories. Although many of them were constantly denied by the latecomers, their theories, as the crystallization of human wisdom, were remembered and inherited by later generations, and because philosophy paid attention to rational reasoning and in-depth thinking, many famous sayings full of speculative wisdom were left, such as being widely circulated? I think therefore I am? ,? A kind heart? , also left many stories. However, these famous sayings can reflect the wisdom of the wise, but they are only attempts to explore the truth, which does not mean that they reveal the truth of the world!

These are two different things. At present, there is no ultimate philosophy to explain the truth of the world, which is one of the reasons why everyone is still discussing here. The life of philosophy is to continue to doubt and think. Therefore, Master Huineng's statement itself has not been proved, nor can it be used to prove that Wang Sheng's statement is the truth. Of course, this does not affect their Excellence in a certain angle.

Everything is intertwined and my mind has changed. Thoughts are electrical impulses of neurons, energy and matter. The so-called idealism itself is an objective existence. Idealism and materialism are not so clear.

Really? Double slit spectroscopy experiment? . Just cut two slits in the cardboard to let the light pass through. We usually see that light will pass through the crack to form two beams of light, because a large number of light ions pass through the crack. So scientists only release one photon and see what happens, just like a ball can't go into two goals at the same time. Surprisingly, when a single photon is emitted, it becomes a wave-like existence when someone observes it, and a point-like existence when no one looks at it.

Like a living and thinking creature. Does this sentence of Wang Yangming also confirm the same phenomenon? Wang Yangming's theory of mind expounds philosophy, and Zen Huineng expounds philosophy through Buddhism. What they want to express is the philosophy of life. Feudal superstition is another aspect, which is different from the philosophy expounded by Xin Xue and Buddhism. Confusion itself is superstition, because ignorance is superstition. If it is a feudal society now, then those who confuse people are feudal superstitions. When people walk around the earth, is it human movement or earth movement?

When the earth is regarded as a static reference, it will produce the image that the earth is static and people are moving; Taking people as a static reference, there will be an image that people are static and the earth is moving. Taking a certain point in the void as a static reference will produce the image that both man and the earth are moving. Different references have different images, that is, different worlds (phenomena). Taking what as a reference is a process of thinking, a process of separation and selection, and a process of heartbeat! Different hearts lead to different images, different worlds and different worlds. When you unconsciously choose the material reference, you can only see the material world and live in it, and come to the conclusion that the world is material.

When you unconsciously choose the reference object of your mind, you can only see the world of your mind and live in it, and come to the conclusion that the world is your mind. I don't quite understand this. For a bad guy, such as a rapist, evil thoughts are born in his heart, and he also acts according to his own heart. For some people, conscience is not born from the heart. If we understand it according to psychology, everything is made by heart, and action tests true knowledge. There is nothing wrong with that rapist! If everyone wants to take conscience as the standard goal, can Yangming's theory of mind be summed up in other words: be a good person?

Everything that exists objectively is your idea, and there is no good or bad in itself, which is determined by your heart. Do you think eating is good or bad? Is sleeping good or bad? It's all up to your heart. Eating too much will make you feel uncomfortable. Do you feel bad when you sleep too much? Isn't that ultimately determined by your heart?

Maybe different creatures have different colors. Lizards may be gray, snakes may be shadows, squirrels may be dark red, and old cows may be light red. What color is this flower? It's not any color. What color is in your heart? Look at what color he is. Maybe you are red and green blind, then you may see green. Mr. Wang Yangming tells people by looking at an example of a flower that all the sensory images and sounds presented in this world are people's own way to understand this world. The real world is not what your eyes see, but what your ears hear. Maybe aliens regard our world as a kind of transparency, which is hard to say.

The world is absolutely idealized. If it is materialistic, the whole set of Buddhism can be denied. Idealism, a whole set of science can explain it. Stubborn classics, focusing on this heart. Where is this heart? Through a lot of conversations. Finally, Ananda realized that the heart was everywhere. Everything is expressed by the heart. Wave-particle duality is not very clear about this problem. Matter is in a granular state due to the observation of the heart, but it is in a fluctuating state without observation. The wave state is invisible. I don't know if it's right. However, only idealism can explain the origin of everything. Materialism cannot explain it. Excuse me, how did the stone come from? Atomic combination? What about atoms? Endless. There is nothing outside the heart, and this heart is the sum of human perception and cognition.

If all mankind were color blind, flowers would have no color and no bright colors. In fact, flowers have no color, but reflect light, showing light waves of different frequencies. Color is given to flowers by people and is the product of the heart. Wang Yangming asked us to ask from the heart. What do we want? Not as good as people all over the world are color-blind, but some people with kung fu have seen color through special cultivation, so their hearts have given flowers unique attributes. For example, Chinese medicine gives flowers medicinal properties, and the flowers in their eyes are no longer the flowers in the eyes of ordinary people. For example, the cow we see is an ordinary cow. In the eyes of experts who know cows, it is endowed with special attributes. He saw (felt) the seams. The water we see is water, and the water that chemists see is H2O. Seeking inward is actually seeking outward, because the external things that are not in the heart are there. What does it have to do with you?

Where did you and the flowers come from? They are as wonderful as nature. Flowers and you are self-fulfilling, flowers are you, you are flowers, flowers are everything, everything is you, flowers are flowers, you are still you, you can't understand independently. If understood separately, it is taken out of context. Generally speaking, they are harmonious and unified.

Calm mind leads to no phase, while heartbeat leads to phase. Things always exist objectively, even if you look at them or not. It doesn't matter to you if you don't look at him. Look at him, he is still him, and you will affect yourself by moving your mind. Subjective consciousness has made judgments about itself and foreign things. You are in a good mood, but the flowers are gorgeous, and you are in a bad mood. Look at the flowers. They are dark and vulgar. Flowers or flowers, you may not be the lonely one.

If you are moved, the subjective will come, and the objective will also be affected. Can you say that flowers have influenced you? Heart ",of course, is not. It is different to peel off subjectivity, so to understand the essence of things, we must put aside subjectivity and recognize ourselves, and at the same time, we must put aside subjective" color "to see things without being confused. This kind of confusion comes from our own thoughts, one good thing and one evil thing, which is born in our hearts. Therefore, Wang Yangming said that if you don't look at it, you will have it. If you don't look at it, you will have it. It is a preconceived idea, close to Zen, flowers are not flowers, and things are not things. More is to look at me from other aspects, and disprove other aspects from me to achieve the most quality, purest, most objective and most natural mind. Simply put, it is Zhuang Zhou's dream butterfly. The leading role of human consciousness is to impose things that didn't exist before, which is an illusion, but this illusion is the stubborn root of human beings, a restraint of "making something out of nothing" and a primitive peace that is not disturbed.

Can only understand, can't express. The most superficial example is that I missed a lot of roadside scenery when I was in a hurry to deliver food. Everything exists because of you, without me and without phase. Wang Yangming belongs to the small phase-free achievement method and knows fairly well. The Mahayana of Buddhism is no self and no phase.

From the point of view of quantum mechanics, Wang Yangming is completely correct. ? When you didn't see this flower, it died with you? According to the Copenhagen school, the moon is both there and not there, in the probability cloud. ? When you look at this flower, the color of this flower will be understood in a moment; Will you know that this flower is not in your heart? Look, the wave function collapses and the moon is there.

Wang Yangming is not only an idealist, but also a typical representative of subjective idealism. Nothing outside Wang Yangming's mind is subjective idealism. He believes that an objective thing (truth) that has nothing to do with people (mind) does not exist. This in itself is subjective idealism. It can only be said that it does not exist for individuals (subjectively), but it cannot exist. People are talking about the existence of things, but you are biased in saying the meaning of things. It's really a bull's head! Quyi this sentence!

If the flower is not in your heart, even if it has color, you will turn a blind eye! This should be pushed to eternal life and then to eternal life. This flower has long been hidden in your subconscious! At the same time, there is a cloud in the Buddhist scriptures: I don't know that there are mountains and rivers outside, and salt is a wonderful thing.