How to evaluate the work Goodbye Painting Pears?

Goodbye Painting Pears is about the romance of a madman.

To most outsiders, the vine tree is a madman like a mental patient, but Goodbye Painting Pears will clear its name. Fujiki is no longer a mental patient. He may still be a madman, but he is no longer a mental patient.

But people will say that what I said is wrong. The vine tree is still a mental patient. Otherwise, how to explain the final explosion?

and the expressions of the whole cartoon are very staggered. Is it "movie" or reality? Do painted pears really exist? Is it ordinary pear painting or blood-sucking pear painting?

Please come in for tea. I've found the evidence that "the vine tree is not a mental patient" (I'm sure. jpg) and come to a reasonable explanation of the plot. So pay attention, my next analysis will be based on the reasonable motives of the author and the characters in the work.

First of all, we should understand the three creative core words of Fujiki's works: truth, love and death.

However, vines write "truth", which is often expressed in "disguise" and "imagination". There is a lot of truth and imagination confusion in Yan Quan, which has been criticized, and finally the truth is mixed with painful fragments and difficult to distinguish.

The vine tree is not satisfied with revealing the hypocrisy of reconstructing reality, but also indulges in deliberately confusing readers. Watching Yan Quan and Goodbye Painting Pears will remind me of the distant mountains and shadows written by Kazuo Blackstone. In this book, memories are used to cover up the facts, images are used to cover up the truth, deceiving readers and satirizing their deception.

In this novel, this kind of confusion is expressed as the fuzziness of readers' identity, that is, from the beginning, the comic reader from God's perspective has gradually become a movie viewer with a limited perspective. Distinguishing whether you are a comic reader or a movie viewer is the key to understanding this book.