Which one is better, ultrasonic humidifier or pure evaporative humidifier? What are the pros and cons of each?

In my personal opinion, pure humidifiers and cold evaporation humidifiers are the same type of humidifiers, they just have different names. They are both mist-free humidifiers. The humidifiers currently on the market mainly include fog-free cold evaporative humidifiers and fogged ultrasonic humidifiers. There is indeed a comparison of the pros and cons of these two humidification methods. When funds are abundant, cold evaporative humidifiers are the better choice.

The ultrasonic humidifier vibrates the water into tiny water droplets through the atomizer to form water mist for humidification. If the added water contains impurities such as calcium and magnesium ions, it will be sprayed very easily. The emergence of "white powder", that is, scale, is not only harmful to the humidifier, but also has a great impact on the health of the respiratory tract. If you want to use it healthily, you have to spend some money on water quality, such as adding pure water and other soft water.

If you want to save this money, you can choose a mist-free humidifier that can add tap water directly. Although it is a little more expensive than an ultrasonic humidifier, it has relatively advantages in terms of humidification effect and water purification. By using pure water molecules for humidification, you can avoid the trouble of scale and water mist mentioned above. If it is for industrial humidification, the Yadu humidifier does a better job in this aspect, and if it is used for household humidification, Schurok's humidifier.

Buying a mist-free humidifier is cost-effective, and it is relatively safe and secure to use.