It is also a kind of "unfilial" to give a baby to the elderly without raising it! Do you agree?

Answer: I agree! This is the "cleverness" of some people. There are even people who claim that if the old man doesn't take care of my children, he won't be given a pension. Maybe they don't realize it's unfilial.

This phenomenon really captures the weakness of the elderly. As an old man, the purpose of raising children for old age is to raise children for old age. If you don't take care of your children, you will have worries when you get old. I'm afraid you have cut off your weakness. In order to keep this weakness, these old people will continue to spend money to save their feelings of supporting the elderly by taking care of their children, which is much more difficult than taking care of their own children. In the process of taking care of children, I really became a paid nanny, not only taking care of children, but also taking care of children! And everything at home should be good. More seriously, sometimes you have to look at your face and be criticized. Old people have to pay silently for their own pension, and even some people are accompanied by a little flattery and embarrassment.

Some children are particularly lazy and don't care about the elderly, thinking that they should share the responsibility and take it for granted. Some old people have children and grandchildren, and there is nothing they can do about it. Who will let themselves face old age? What is more sad is that when they are old, they can't get the support of their children with a good attitude, so these old people will raise their grandchildren as their own sons and work hard for the prevention of old age all their lives.

Imagine this: all these children have raised their own children. If their parents are away, or their parents can't take care of you because of poor health, then you have to find a way to solve it yourself.

This kind of baby doesn't have a baby, so it's an excuse that he doesn't have time to relax and throws the baby to the elderly. Some people are: if you don't bring it for me, you have to pay the nanny, and they enjoy life with their own money. I think the old man's money will be mine sooner or later. I spend early, not late. I spent a lot of money and didn't know how to be grateful. Old people have paid a lot of hardships to raise their children in recent years, some are willing and some are unwilling.

So some old people think that they are over 60 years old, or even over 70 years old, and they are too tired all their lives. If they have blessings that they can't enjoy and sins that they can't stand, they will be cruel. They would rather have no one to support the elderly than take care of their children.

For a family, "children are essential family members". Young people not only want to have the joy of being parents, but also want to save trouble. It is extremely irresponsible for his own children to abandon their babies to their parents first, not to mention that such children are filial to their parents.

Since you have chosen to have children, you should be responsible for them, otherwise you should not have children. Kyle and his wife, Xiao Rui, got married and lived in their parents' home. Soon they had a child. Half a year after Kyle and Xiao Rui's baby were born, Xiao Rui went to work. The children are totally dependent on Kyle's parents to take care of them. Occasionally, children can only see Kyle and Xiao Rui after weekly services.

In this case, working families are very common, but cities are generally rare, because young people know that it is hard to take care of their children, but they still do it themselves, so that children can establish deep feelings with their parents in daily communication; So that children can be disciplined accordingly. As we all know, old people tend to spoil their children, which often leads to their ignorance. As the saying goes, "Fiona Fang can't be made without rules", which is the truth.

Therefore, if you have a child but don't raise it, at least you don't know how to take care of your parents, which is extremely unfavorable for your child's future growth. Besides, you will have feelings about who your children grow up with. By then, your children will be strangers to your parents, and it will be too late for you to regret it.

~ I hope my answer can help you

Have you ever encountered such an event in your life? Please leave a message, and welcome to pay attention to the life taste of @ Quezhiling. Please compare the greatest support and encouragement of the creator.

The old man has worked hard all his life to cultivate his children and help them get married. They think that after their children get married, their tasks are completed and they can enjoy their old age. They don't know that the hard times are about to begin again. To help children with their children, they have to help their children and grandchildren with three meals a day. With the full liberalization of the "two-child policy", more and more elderly people have become the main force with children. It is not uncommon for young people to have children without them. For a long time, taking care of children and doing housework has made many elderly people physically and mentally exhausted. It is indeed unfilial for young people to have children without them.

It is an obligation, not a responsibility, for the elderly to help their children with their babies. I remember seeing a sentence before, which I think is very reasonable, that is, everyone only needs to be responsible for the person who gave birth to me and the person I gave birth to. That's true. Parents who gave birth to you and raised you must be responsible. You gave birth to your own child. Since you gave birth to him, you have to help him complete his upbringing and marriage, and of course you have to be responsible.

Children should be responsible for what happens after marriage. Old people have no obligation to raise the third generation. If the old man is willing to take it, it is mutual affection, not the duty of the old man.

Old people with babies are not afraid of fatigue, hardship and thankless work. Sometimes, the old people also want to give full play to their residual heat, help take care of their grandchildren, and cook three meals by the way, for fear that they will be thankless.

Children generally stumble and fall, and it is inevitable to blame the elderly for not being optimistic when they go home; The child caught a cold, and the child complained that the old man did not add clothes in time; Children are not good at fighting with friends, and children have to blame the elderly for their poor education.

It doesn't matter if the old man is tired with the baby, but he will still worry that he will be blamed by his children, so there is a saying among the people: "Beggars are not as good as beggars." Although this folk saying is a bit excessive, it is enough to show that it is really not easy to bring a baby.

In order to reduce the burden on the elderly, children should take the initiative to take care of their children before and after work. Young couples, one with a baby at home, are really not practical, and it is difficult to maintain their daily expenses by one person's salary. As an old man, I definitely want to help share a little, help with the baby or do some housework, and let young people go to work with peace of mind.

However, as the elderly grow older, their physical strength and energy will get worse year by year. As children, we should take the initiative to do housework before or after work and take care of the baby, so that the elderly can relax for a few hours in the day of taking care of the baby.

Old people are willing to share the burden for their children, and children should also think of their parents, be more considerate and blame their parents less. The family helps each other, enjoys each other and raises the baby. This question is answered in two situations.

What you said is that you have the conditions and ability not to take it, and let the elderly take it. In this case, I agree with you Taking care of children is a tiring job, and at the same time, it is also a great responsibility. Taking care of children now is not like the fifties and sixties, where there are more children and sisters, and the pressure of taking care of children is not great. Try extensive management. Children nowadays are not like this. Some young people leave their children to the elderly to wait on them for their own happiness. They should eat and have fun, no matter whether the old people are hardworking or not. They just play when they like children, and then leave them to the elderly, as if children were for the elderly. They don't care, not only don't wait on them, but also don't care about the children's expenses. This behavior is really unfilial. They had a good time and the old man worked hard.

Another situation is that they really don't have the time and energy to take care of their children. Many of them are restricted by family conditions. If they don't go out to make money, life will go wrong. It's not that they don't want to take care of their children, it's the pressure of life. There is no way. The old man has nothing to do at this time and can't take care of the children. In this case, the elderly love children, and help them when they are involved. The old man takes care of his children, and his children can go out to work by themselves, like

To sum up, in today's society, there are not a few elderly people without children, but most of them with children. This seems to be a common phenomenon in society. It is natural for children to think that old people should take care of their children. What's more, there are many children, whether they take care of the elderly or not. If you don't take care of my children, I won't support you when I am old. What's so sad!

Should old people take care of children? Personally, I think it is a kindness to take care of them, and it is a responsibility not to take care of them. Strictly speaking, the old man has no obligation to take care of his children. Poor people inherit the wind, how many old people suffer for giving up their children? Most elderly people take the initiative to help their children take care of their children, but as children, you should know that this is because the elderly take care of you, and taking care of your children is not their business. They have no obligation to take care of your children, just because the old people take care of you. Therefore, as children, we should know how to be grateful, be filial to the elderly and warm their hearts when we have time. Don't think the old people owe you. Let them take care of the children when you have time.

Say these, just talk about the matter, no malice, don't sit in the right place, don't be true to anyone, don't like it.

Finally, I wish all babies healthy growth!

"Raising a baby every other generation" has little to do with "unfilial". It is important for children to know how to be grateful and pay attention to how to educate them.

It should be a survey conducted by a professional organization on 20 16. What parents in China lack most in educating their children is "love" and "science". I think it is a lack of "love" to let parents take care of the baby.

Children aged 0-3 need a sense of belonging most. Mother's breathing and touching have a magical effect on children's sense of stability and security.

Although grandparents like to "take care of their children every other generation", it is undeniable that some old people's thoughts can't keep up with their children's development. Old ideas conflict with children's new ideas, and the elderly generally give priority to reprimanding and coercion. This is not good for children and the elderly. Is it also a kind of "unfilial"

Nowadays, young people are under great work pressure and have a fast pace, and few people can take care of their children at home full-time. At this time, the help of parents is also necessary, which can also promote family harmony. But if we criticize each other, it will not only lead to bad babies, but also lead to family conflicts, which will not pay off.

In a word, I don't think it is "unfilial" to let parents take care of their children, but I still advocate that young parents take care of themselves and let parents become helpers, and children can't rely entirely on their parents.

For today's society, there is a new kind of unfilial: young people only have children, but the burden of raising a baby falls on the shoulders of the elderly. I'm really a little unpredictable. I feel that choosing the opinions circulating in the society will really affect a person's mood. Not recently, a new type of unfilial began to take shape. "If you don't help me with my children, I won't give you a pension." I don't know what is the reason for this view, is it spoiled by parents or something? Parents have worked hard for most of their lives, and finally they have to help you take care of your children before they are eligible to enjoy your old-age service. It's really chilling It is normal for old people not to help with their children. After all, they have worked hard for most of their lives and are tired. When they finally start to have their own time, why do they spend most of their energy taking care of their children? Forget it if the old man wants to. I'm not willing to hurt people like this. Try to put yourself in others' shoes. When you are old, have no energy and are in poor health, your children ask you to take care of them and even threaten you. What kind of mood do you have?

You should be grateful to the elderly who take the initiative to take care of your children, instead of yelling at the elderly because of the contradiction between taking care of the children and losing your temper with the elderly. Such behavior will undoubtedly hurt the old man's heart of loving and caring for you. If you don't have it in your heart, how can you give up time to take care of the children? Not because I'm worried that I'm working too hard alone.

Don't be too demanding and scold those old people who don't want to help you with your children. After all, they don't have the energy to work for you all their lives. Let them travel after retirement, play mahjong and walk their dogs. I believe this kind of life is also the life you want to have in your later years. You want to be a happy old lady or grandfather.

Never say "I won't give you a pension if you don't take care of my children", which is undoubtedly the most hurtful thing. Moreover, in our country, there is no law that the elderly should help you raise children, but there is a law that clearly stipulates that the elderly should be supported, so don't say such things again because of such things, which will really make people who love you feel chilling.

Although the pressure of this generation is really great, it can't be a reason for you to squeeze your parents. It is mutual affection for the old man to help you with your children. This is not my duty. The ancients said don't do to others what you don't want them to do to you. In this case, we must keep rational thinking and not be too emotional. This is not good.

Letting parents take care of their children is equivalent to letting them retire and go to work.

They study hard all their lives, in order to find a good job, work hard, find a good object, fall in love, form a good family, work hard, study hard for their children, find a good job for their children, and work hard for their children to buy a house and get married.

Busy all my life, for this family, for the children. When I get old, I think I can live for myself.

Unexpectedly, for the sake of children's children, I still have to continue to work hard.

Isn't it mental and physical to occupy your parents' old age?

This kind of unfilial, probably like Wilde said: "You take it without humiliation, and accept it without gratitude."

The above is my brief introduction to the formation of new unfilial. I have to say that such a view is a false speech guide, and we should try our best to avoid the spread of such a view, rather than affirming its so-called correctness. Such false statements are very bad for yourself and others, so don't blindly force your parents to help you do all kinds of things, learn to understand, have a tolerant heart, understand your parents, and establish the concept that children should take care of themselves.

A couple gave birth to their own children and gave them to their sister and brother-in-law. They also gave birth to three children in a row, all of which were thrown to their sister and brother-in-law.

This is a wonderful thing I heard the other day.

Sister and brother-in-law are all in business. On the grounds that it is inconvenient to take the children around, the children will live in their sister's house after the full moon.

At that time, her sister's children were over one year old and could not take them to work. She said to ask her sister to take it with her, and then take it away when the child is older.

But after two years, my sister came back and gave birth to a baby at my sister's house with a big belly. By the way, I went to the boss's house. The second child is 40 days old. Let my sister help.

When she came back for the third time, she was pregnant again. She also saw her sister's unhappiness. She said she wouldn't go this time, she was going to buy a house, and then she would go with her three children.

I went to the second room and gave birth to the third room. After 40 days, I really didn't leave. I looked at the house with my sister and brother-in-law and bought it. When the house formalities were finished, she sneaked away again.

Where's sister? She has no idea where her sister and brother-in-law do business. Her parents have passed away and there are only two sisters. If she doesn't help with the children, can she let them sleep on the street?

I really don't know what my little sister thinks when I listen to this. Why have so many children when you can't raise them by yourself?

Some parents really don't deserve to be parents. Without parents to rely on, she dared to throw it to her sister.

The subject of this question also depends on the situation. If the young couple are busy at work after giving birth, they will give their parents living expenses, and they will often come back to help take care of them. This is a common situation in ordinary families. Can't say that their children are unfilial.

However, as I wrote earlier, this kind of elder sister, as soon as the child is born, the husband and wife disappear without a trace, and they are completely left to their parents to raise, and they don't pay a penny for living expenses, and they usually don't care. This is really unfilial, and it is a big unfilial.

It is a tragedy for parents to share such children, but such children may not be better off when they are old.

Because they have no feelings for their children, they have not raised them, and they have not fulfilled their educational responsibilities and obligations.

When they are old, their children will be kind and give them some money. Usually they don't even want to see it. People who are not kind simply ignore it.

First, in fact, most young parents are willing to have a baby. It's never wrong to take care of your own baby. Many developed countries do not have the tradition of bringing up children every other generation. Pregnant in October, which parent is unwilling to witness the growth of accompanying children? If you throw it at the old man, there is a reason.

Second, real life is really difficult. Some families can't cope with life by earning a salary alone, so they have to ask the elderly to help take care of their children. Some of them take their parents to look after their children after work every day. This situation should be the majority in cities. I think it's a good match. With their parents around, young people can concentrate on their work and accompany their children to grow up after work. This can't be called "dumping". To make matters worse, those who leave their children at home seldom see each other several times a year. This situation is more like "dumping", but the reality is often so helpless. I believe that if there is a way, parents are not willing to do so.

Third, parents are not old enough to help their children share the burden. Some parents are healthy and energetic. It is understandable that they are willing to help take care of the children. Is it not good to enjoy family happiness? As the younger generation, we should remember their goodness and understand them from all aspects.

Therefore, the subject problem should be considered comprehensively from different angles of the family.

Your own children bring them by themselves, and the old man has no obligation to help you. It doesn't make sense that our parents have worked so hard to raise us and now let them raise grandchildren.

Moreover, children are not accompanied by their parents since childhood, and childhood is incomplete. When I grew up, I recalled my childhood and lost a lot of situational communication with my parents.

As parents, if they are not accompanied by their children when they are young, they will be estranged from their children and will not feel happy with their families. Moreover, educating children by the elderly is very different from educating children by themselves.

I don't agree with this statement. It is unfilial for an old man to take care of his children!

The fast-paced lifestyle in today's society has made many family children become left-behind children. Especially in rural areas, low economic income and raising a family are all problems. Parents leave their sweetheart and stay away from home, fighting for a better life at home. They can't take their children to work to earn money, let alone make the elderly unable to find jobs.

A child is a piece of meat in the hands of parents. Who would throw it to someone else if it wasn't involuntary? You know, there are no old people at home. Taking care of children at home, I can't find a suitable job for my children to go to school. The family relies on one person's salary to support the family, and life is tight. It costs money for children to go to school, live at home and get sick. If a college student studies, do you think the salary is enough?

The old man is too old to do heavy work or go to work. It's good to look after children at home. How can it be unfilial? Do you think my answer is correct?