I am eager to get the review of Beyond Heaven! Thank you. Urgent!

The sunset glow dyed the sky red, and I strolled on my way to school. The students are talking loudly, but I have no intention of participating in their conversation. Today, I just finished watching the movie Beyond Heaven, and what impressed me most was Teacher Luo.

This movie is about: xu teacher went to the countryside for an internship for three months, but neither the village head Li Datou nor the headmaster Mr. Luo wanted him to come, for fear that the students would be reluctant to leave xu teacher like the previous teacher. Three months later, xu teacher is leaving, and the students are reluctant to go. When xu teacher was looking for a job, she saw Li Datou, the village chief, coming to see her. It turned out that Mr. Luo died of a mudslide because he was repairing the classroom and carrying yellow mud up the mountain. Hearing the news, xu teacher returned to the countryside to continue teaching.

I was very sad when I heard the news of Teacher Luo's death. What a good teacher he is! His beauty is unparalleled! His beauty illuminates our hearts and lets us know what kind of teenagers we should be. Teacher Luo is our role model. He has been teaching children all his life to learn knowledge. By contrast, I am the little princess at home. You tell me to go east, and I'll go west. I never suffer, and I'm a little unreasonable. Now I understand! We should learn from Mr. Luo's quality of illuminating others with love.

Teacher Luo, you are my role model.

I have watched all the movies recommended by my friends recently. A friend recently recommended a movie "Beyond Heaven". Download it quickly. The downloaded video is really good, which is better than the D9 compressed disk I bought in China. Let's get down to business. Tell me about this movie.

For the old movies released in 2007, according to the usual practice, I watch the movies first, and then watch the movie conciseness and online reviews. If I have to sum up this film in one sentence, I can only say that it is a youth film, suitable for high school students as life encouragement films, college students as entrepreneurship guidance films, newly graduated post-80s as social funny films, and special people with similar experiences as life sentimental films.

The content of the film is relatively simple. Men and women who are about to graduate from two universities go to the countryside to teach for three months. In order to test the love of male college students, female college students promised him to get married as long as they persisted for three months. Naturally, in the countryside, I met all kinds of difficulties in life, work and love. Finally, the boys escaped, and the girls returned to school and entered the society three months later. At the end of the film, the village chief told The Paper when he visited the female college students in the city that the original teacher in the rural primary school had died, and the female college students resolutely returned to teach in the rural primary school.

The content is probably like this, but the film uses a funny description technique, which reveals humor everywhere, causing the collision between urban culture and rural culture, thus causing jokes. But the ultimate goal of this movie is definitely not funny.

The film triggered the association of several words:

1, love

Love is a kind of balance, and the balance of love should not always be biased to one side, which will lead to the imbalance of the balance.

Many people think that men actually pay more than girls in the process of pursuing girls, but what they see is not love. When they enter the marriage hall, the balance of love will adjust his previous imbalance. So this is why almost all women are complaining that their husbands are not as good as before marriage. Now I'm telling you, it's not because he doesn't love you enough, but because the laws of nature require a balance of love.

Everyone knows the balance, even if you shake it from side to side, as long as the weight is the same, you will reach balance. More importantly, it can tolerate a certain weight difference and achieve tilt balance, but if the weight difference exceeds its limit, it will lead to weighing failure. I describe the love in the film as a period of time beyond the weighing range of the original tilted balance. I believe this image metaphor clearly tells everyone what love is in this film.

You can put everything on the scale of love, including your health, parents, ideals, money, sports cars and houses. The more you put, the more the balance will tilt, especially if you only put things in one tray, not the same thing or the same weight in another tray. This situation will definitely cause the balance to tilt. Whether it is beyond that range depends on the level of the person who adds weight.

By the way, there are some weights that I call fixed weights. This weight determination does not mean that he will determine the weight, but that he can only decide who will take it. Moreover, there is a repulsive effect between fixed weight and fixed weight. You can't take that with this, haha, so how to choose a fixed weight is really a science on the balance of love.

Many people were moved by Xu's deeds after reading the whole article. I can say responsibly here that she is a very kind person. I admire and admire her righteous act, but I stand against her view of love. She is too concerned about the contents of her tray to know the existence of the other tray, let alone adjust it. I didn't expect such a balance to tilt and collapse completely.

2. Education

I am deeply impressed by why our country is getting richer and richer, but many rural children can't get a good education. This movie reminds me of one of Zhang Yimou's early works, No Child Left Behind, which is still fresh in my memory. That movie touched me and made me feel that the movie made in 2007 was also about the countryside. Why is there no progress in rural areas in China?

Our government is very rich, so rich that hundreds of billions of foreign exchange reserves are directly burned by the depreciation of the US dollar. Rich enough to invest tens of millions to establish a tiger protection base in the nature reserve where Zhou Tiger was found in Shaanxi. GDP is increasing every year, and GPN is also increasing rapidly, but we really can't see how much benefit rural people get. Perhaps the burden of our country is too heavy, but as a provider of means of subsistence, why should we bear all the misfortunes? China has a large population, and a lot of food is still imported in large quantities. I really don't understand. If it is a market economy, does it mean that the products in short supply in the market will definitely increase in price? Does the price increase mean that producers of products in short supply get more profits? But I have seen the price increase of pork, mutton and chicken, the price increase of rice, oil and salt, and the price increase of vegetables and fruits. Why can't I see any farmers getting rich from this? Why under the market economy mechanism, other industries, industries, handicrafts and businessmen can follow the law of supply and demand, but agriculture, which provides people with daily rations, can't get this opportunity?

Does it mean that agriculture will not develop well until 2020? Education problems in rural areas followed. If rural children have only a small chance to enter the city by going to college when they grow up, then do most other people have to become migrant workers, construction workers in the city and miss KTV?

Education in rural areas should be put on the agenda, and everyone has the responsibility to do something practical instead of donating money to Hope Primary School.

Step 3 think rationally

Many people have lofty ideals, some big and some small. Reminds me of Lu Tao's ideal in his struggle to build the largest transparent maze in the world and become an art exchange center. Maybe this ideal will never come true, but there is no denying that she is beautiful.

The film didn't mention any ideal words, but it was implicit. Maybe the people in the play don't know what the ideal is at all, but what is clear is that the ideal is not. College students who have just entered the society are full of hope for a new life, and their ideals are not yet mature. At this time, it is difficult to locate their own life ideals. So it is correct not to mention the word ideal in the film.

Judging from the short teaching process, Xu obviously has no clear ideal, and even uses this way to test love, which fully shows his psychological naivety. It was a test for San Mao to take Jose to the Sahara, but San Mao had a good eye and brought a person worth testing. I can't see where Jiang's ideal is. Little turtle's performance is really cold and humorous. According to my analysis, he didn't learn what he should have learned in Europe and Australia, but he inherited all the bad habits of his family. Stop arguing, a prodigal son of a rich family like him. He may not even know what his ideal is. He can waste his youth at will for a girl he doesn't like so much. He still has a long way to go.

The only person in the film who reveals the ideal is Teacher Luo, who is so simple that he doesn't even know what the ideal is. But I am constantly fighting for my "ideal". There are really too many people like China, but they have not gained enough social status. A family rescue team is active in the northeast of China. It goes to the streets every day to help people who have car accidents on suburban roads. They are all at their own expense and don't want to return them. Now there are many volunteers gathered there, and the scale is relatively large, but few people report and publicize them. Also in the northeast, an old couple rode a tricycle all over the country just to promote the Olympic Games. But how many people have heard of their stories and how many media have publicized and praised them? In China, there are always such a group of people who are hidden in the downtown area or in their hands. These are the real masters. There is an old saying in China, isn't it? A smart head makes a smart mouth, and a smart head makes a fake head, which makes sense.

There are not many places to comment on the whole film. Let's talk about the characters briefly.

1, Xu

Children who don't understand love are very popular in appearance. I believe that the visual impact on the audience is not enough, and the majority of female friends can breathe a sigh of relief. I have analyzed my attitude towards love before. To sum up here, she is a girl who only cares about her own tray, even women, and is farther away from love.

The ideal ambition is remarkable, especially the scene of taking a photo with the children in front of the school at last, which is touching. But it does make people wonder how long she can last.

Her professional ability is very general, and she can't find advanced teaching methods except speaking standard Mandarin. I have a minor degree, but the scene of taking little ass to the mountains for an outing is somewhat puzzling. Do you want to guide children's yearning for a better life or satisfy their own aesthetic taste? Unfortunately, the director didn't play it thoroughly. I am very, very dissatisfied with the director. I want to say a few words here. Originally, the beautiful scenery in the countryside can be arranged in several very emotional scenes to have a panoramic view, but I have never seen the same beautiful scenery as ink painting, nor have I seen the same scene of talking on the roof over 50 miles away. I feel very sorry, wife. How perfect it would be to put the conflict and warm picture of the hero and heroine in a vast world and a starry wilderness. It's a pity that the director is not Zhang Yimou, not a master's work, and often not only lacks depth.

Comment on Xu's words-tenderness!

2. Jiang

A little child, who doesn't understand love and ideals, is completely blank. His world is very narrow and representative. Because many people now take this narrowness as their goal in life and intend to train the next generation, which is sad!

Business ability is relatively strong, and both the main course and the sub-course can be integrated into a more advanced way, which brings freshness and excitement to little ass students and broadens their horizons. But whether this teaching method is suitable for that specific situation depends on the comments of experts in the industry.

As a member of the post-80s generation, Jiang's representativeness is also reflected in his flexible mind, sizing up the situation, not eating immediate losses, being able to cut the gordian knot and give up things that are unfavorable to him. This decisive thinking and behavior is a typical feature of the new generation that emerged after 1980s. Dude, I don't want to talk to you. Break up without talking. Dude, he's still a hero after drinking two bottles of wine. In the past, if those two people had a relationship, they might be enemies all their lives. Even if you don't get married and get married separately, there will be many encounters when you meet again. The times are progressing and the concept of love is changing. Whether it suits you or not is the key.

Comment on a word of ginger-meat! One is eager for meat, the other is as oily as meat, and the third is to find a suitable place to live. If he is cut and thrown aside, the wine will not only turn pale, but will soon rot. )

3. Teacher Luo

Actor is one of my least favorite comedians, and I always feel that my acting skills are affected. In this film, the performance is acceptable, and a rural teacher is more realistic.

In love, Teacher Luo is extremely inferior. Also, being a teacher in the countryside is a very decent position and should have a certain social status in the local area. Besides, he was a college student. According to common sense, in the countryside, he broke the threshold by proposing marriage. But please note that this is a new socialist countryside, and the vast number of rural young men and women are devoted to the construction of infinite cities. It is not surprising that a little beautiful girl will hardly fall into the lower class of life in the city, which is also the social status quo. Women with flowers, like Mr. Yang Er, are firmly out of the mountains, so it is definitely crooked to estimate that they will not come out in the countryside now. Although Mr. Luo has reached marriageable age, he still has no girlfriend, which is also an important reason why rural education can't keep people!

In business, Mr Luo Can is conscientious. The sincerity and devotion to education are obvious to all, but his teaching level is backward and there is no way to help him. His cultural level is the highest in the village.

Ideally, what I realized was that Teacher Luo expected little ass to go out of the countryside, but not through the spring show, but through the narrow way of studying and being admitted to the university. This is also his inner contradiction. On the one hand, he expects his children to go out, and on the other hand, he knows that this road is difficult. I really feel sad about this social situation. I don't know if this film can get social attention, but at present, it seems that there is no splash at all. Pathetic!

There are almost no classic lines in the whole article, so I won't summarize it. The whole play was shot roughly, with a good theme and a good performance. As a youth film, it can be seen.