Excellent Review of Watergate Bridge in Changjin Lake (850 words)

After tasting a film and television work, what did you learn from this movie? You might as well sit down and write a good review. Then can you write it down? The following is my 850-word (generally 6-word) excellent review of Watergate Bridge in Changjin Lake 2022, for your reference, hoping to help friends in need.

Excellent comments on Watergate Bridge in Changjin Lake 850 words 1 After watching the movie Watergate Bridge in Changjin Lake, my feelings can be summarized in eight words-blood boiling and tears in my eyes.

A group of hot-blooded men have accomplished almost impossible combat tasks with indestructible will. This film gives the audience a good understanding of what is to defend our country, what is the Great Wall of Steel, and what is to fight with life. ...

One or three battles

In the face of the American troops planning to evacuate from Xiaqiuli Airport, the volunteers charged the enemy positions with the captured American artillery fire. Volunteers who dare to fight and fight are desperate to rush to the US military, shouting loudly and trumpeting loudly, without fear of life and death. This heroic and high-spirited momentum has absolutely crushed the US military, which has been crying destructively.

Watergate Bridge is the only way for the enemy to escape to Nanxing Port, and it has become the focus of competition between the enemy and the enemy. Under the leadership of company commander Wu, Qi Lian ordered that the bridge must be blown up. From the south of the bridge, the north of the bridge, the pump house and the enemy headquarters, with the experience and wisdom of the commander, the tacit understanding and cooperation of the comrades, and the brave and tenacious fighting spirit, the bridge was finally successfully bombed.

The bridge was repaired by enemy reinforcements, and the remaining volunteers chose to die this time. With the determination to die with the enemy, blow up the bridge with your life. Cast the Great Wall of Steel with flesh and blood, and turn flesh and blood into artillery explosives.

Second, the friendship of comrades in arms.

The heroic company has heroic temperament. Yu Congrong alone led away the enemy bombers, protecting the lives of his comrades. The company commander Wu was trapped under the bridge and ordered everyone to retreat, let go of themselves and be ready to sacrifice at any time; Wave after wave, fighting for brothers who rushed to enemy tanks with explosives, and so on. Every volunteer soldier only thinks of his motherland, his relatives and his comrades-in-arms, and never considers personal safety or life and death.

Third, the comparison between the enemy and ourselves.

A group of ragged, scarred and hungry volunteers. Even if the appearance is somewhat unsatisfactory, it can't hide the burning eyes, unyielding beliefs and noble souls. It was a group of shining soldiers, and their spirit was strong enough to destroy all cutting-edge weapons.

The enemy was well dressed and armed, drinking hot coffee and eating cooked steak. There are absolutely superior aircraft battle groups in the sky, powerful tanks and cannons on the ground, but they are full of fear. Once arrogant, he was ruthlessly beaten in front of reality. All reactionaries are paper tigers.

Finally, please allow me to quote the famous saying of writer Wei Wei: Dear friend, when you are sitting in the cinema watching movies, do you realize that you are in happiness?

You may be surprised to say, "This is very common!" "But the movie Watergate Bridge in Changjin Lake will tell you that you are living in happiness. Only by recognizing this, can you understand more deeply the reason why our soldiers are desperate in North Korea.

Pay tribute to our most lovely people!

Excellent comments on Watergate Bridge in Changjin Lake 850 words 2 I'm a little old, but I'm actually afraid to write patriotic films, especially those praising the heroic deeds of the Korean War. I don't think this year's movie about the Battle of Changjin Lake should be shown. Because the battle of Changjin Lake was a bitter battle for China, the winner, and the so-called United Nations Army, the loser. From a historical point of view, we can't just say that the volunteers have high political consciousness and sacrificed their lives for the peaceful development of new China, while ignoring the courage and resourcefulness of Song, commander of our 9th Army. Similarly, from a historical point of view, we can't just say that MacArthur is arrogant and underestimates his enemies, ignoring that they can be unhurried and fearless in times of crisis. From the results, China reversed the situation of the Korean War through the battle of Changjin Lake. The United States, on the other hand, has never given up its strategic decision to station troops at overseas bases because of its rapid and motorized deployment of troops.

The tragic war has gone beyond the limits of human nature. Judging from the basic cognitive and moral requirements of human beings, it is estimated that the generals and soldiers of the US military have knelt down. Because they never really understand that people with faith can overcome objective difficulties with spiritual will. Honestly, I don't understand either. Personally, I think it is debatable to see Chairman Mao praising Xunzi's philosophical thought that "man can conquer nature". Looking at today's battle of Changjin Lake, the philosophical thought that man can conquer nature has played a great role in Chinese people's Volunteer Army's victory in the battle of Changjin Lake. No wonder General Smith, head of the first division of the enemy Gome, sighed to the sky: "Chinese people's Volunteer Army is invincible!"

Considering the current Sino-US relations, it is really impossible for the US imperialists to talk to China with strength. This year, our director Yang has been telling his American counterparts in Alaska that "the United States is not qualified to talk to China from the perspective of strength. Twenty years ago, thirty years ago, you were not qualified. " What I want to say is, I'm afraid that as early as 1953, when the Korean War ceased, American imperialists were no longer qualified to talk to China from the standpoint of strength.

East and west can cooperate, but they don't have to confront each other. Just like for thousands of years, the traditional powerful eastern regime did not oppress or conquer the West. Now, after hundreds of years of industrial development, the West, led by American imperialists, should not oppress and conquer the East. It is best to completely withdraw troops from Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and other countries.

At the moment when the world is experiencing the information revolution, the West should compete with the East in the right way, instead of blocking the development of the East in the information revolution by withholding people's sanctions and cutting off supply.

Facts have proved that the people of China do not make trouble and are not afraid of things! It is totally impracticable to extremely hinder development or even try to deprive the right to development.