Court final presentation skills. Good sentences will go from losing to winning.

1, the final statement of the court is the right of every defendant. In fact, it is also very simple, a bit like self-criticism in my student days. Generally speaking, it is nothing more than "regret+guarantee+request"

As an integral part of the court trial process, the defendant's final statement helps the judge to find out the truth of the case.

3. The final statement procedure can highlight the respect for the defendant's personal dignity.

The defendant's final statement also has a certain educational function, that is, to declare the law to the audience in the form of cases and advise the public not to commit crimes.

5. In addition, the right of final statement is not entirely the right of defense.

1. The final statement of the court is the right of every defendant. It's actually very simple. It's a bit like self-criticism in my school days. Generally speaking, it is nothing more than "repentance+guarantee+request". Specifically, it is to say that you have realized your mistake in combination with your own illegal behavior, and then promise to abide by the law in the future, and then explain the circumstances of your lighter punishment (such as first offense, no criminal record, accessory, no serious consequences in the case, etc.). ), request the court to give you a lighter punishment and give you a chance to turn over a new leaf.

As an integral part of the court trial process, the defendant's final statement helps the judge to find out the truth of the case. In a specific criminal case, the defendant is often the person who knows the case best, so his statement is of great value to the trial of the case. The defendant's final statement can often show the defendant's subjective personality characteristics most intensively and obviously. Through court investigation and court debate, the defendant's final statement often has new contents compared with the previous statement. Therefore, the defendant's final statement has important reference value for the judge to make a correct judgment. If new evidence or other new circumstances are found in the defendant's final statement, the judge should take further measures instead of adjourning the court. The Supreme People's Court stipulated in his judicial interpretation: "If the defendant puts forward new facts and evidence in his final statement and the collegial panel thinks that it may affect the correct judgment, the court investigation shall be resumed; If the defendant puts forward new defense reasons, the collegial panel may resume the court debate if it deems it necessary.

3. The final statement procedure can highlight the respect for the defendant's personal dignity. If the above is based on the consideration of accurately punishing crimes, it can be considered as the consideration of protecting the defendant's human rights. With the continuous advancement of the rule of law, people pay more and more attention to procedures. In the past, the view that procedural law is a vassal of substantive law is no longer the mainstream view in academia and even in practice. People realize that the procedure has its intrinsic value, and this value is diversified. Among them, the value that the procedure can reflect the dignity of the parties has aroused full concern. "The procedural guarantee system stipulated in the procedural law emphasizes the personal dignity of the parties and the dominant position of legal relations, embodies the concepts of justice, democracy and the rule of law, and makes litigation have the image of rational activities." Regardless of whether the defendant's final statement has a substantial impact on the final judgment, the final statement procedure can still release the defendant's repressed feelings to a certain extent. Although the defendant's dominant position has been established, no one can deny that the defendant is in an embarrassing position in criminal proceedings, which will inevitably have some negative effects on his psychology. Therefore, it is not unnecessary to build a platform for the defendant to release his emotions. Of course, in the final statement, the defendant can't be infinite and inexhaustible, but he will still be subject to certain restrictions, which will be discussed in detail below.

4. The defendant's final statement also has a certain educational function, that is, in the form of a case, it announces the law to the people who are listening and exhorts the people not to violate the law and commit crimes. Originally, the function of education should be said to be a function of the whole trial and even the whole criminal procedure. However, the defendant's final statement often has a stronger and more direct educational color. The defendant will show people his inner feelings emotionally from his own personal experience, which has the nature of "the last parting words". Some statements may have nothing to do with finding out the facts of the case, so they may not be made in other proceedings. However, the restrictions on the defendant's final statement in various countries' legislation are generally "related to the case" or "not irrelevant". Although this statement has nothing to do with finding out the facts, it should be said to be "related to the case" and "not irrelevant". And this statement will also be related to the guilty attitude when sentencing. Compared with other court proceedings, the final statement may be more touching to the audience, and it can better reflect the function of persuasion and education. Of course, the judge cannot guide the defendant's final statement in this regard. After all, the final statement is the defendant's right, and it also bears the function of embodying the defendant's personal dignity.

5. In addition, the right of final statement is not entirely the right of defense. Finally, the right of statement has the function of highlighting the defendant's sense of dignity and releasing the defendant's inner feelings. The right to defense has a premise, that is, it must first be embodied as confrontation. In some cases, the defendant's final statement is not antagonistic, but only a lyrical expression, and the right of final statement will be reflected as a right to vent emotions. The nature of the right of final statement is also determined by the special status of the defendant being prosecuted by the state, which means that the defendant is under greater psychological pressure than anyone else in criminal proceedings. Of course, the release of the defendant's emotions is not endless and should be related to the case.