Sixth grade debate composition

In study, work or life, everyone will inevitably come into contact with or use composition. According to different genres, composition can be divided into narrative, expository, practical and argumentative. Do you know how to write a good composition? The following is the composition of the sixth grade of the debate competition that I helped you organize. I hope it will help you.

The sixth grade composition 1 had only watched the debate on TV before, but I didn't expect to be promoted to the fifth grade. After learning the first set of texts, the teacher organized us to have a debate.

The theme of our debate is "Is it beneficial to open books?" The teacher selected six students from the voluntary students to do the pros and cons respectively.

In the envious eyes of the students, six debaters stepped onto the platform, separated the two sides in an appropriate way and started the debate.

In the first round, some of the six debaters used famous sayings to demonstrate their views, some used personal experiences to demonstrate their views, and some cited examples from life to demonstrate their views. Maybe it's not enough preparation, or maybe it's not debated on the stage. The six contestants are not loud, and they speak a little too fast, so they can't hear clearly with bated breath.

Among the six debaters, Jiang impressed me the most. Because in the second round of debate, only he dared to refute. He used the phrase "nutrition is out of date" to strongly refute Fan's famous saying that "books are the nutrition of the whole world". This makes everyone feel refreshed.

After the second round of debate, it is impossible. So the teacher made a summary. She said that reading the right book in the right place at the right time is definitely beneficial, otherwise it may not be beneficial. I hope students can open their books and open them well. ...

This debate, although not as fierce as the acrimonious and tit-for-tat scenes I saw on TV, is the beginning of our stepping onto the podium. I believe that after studying hard and practicing hard, we will certainly make greater progress.

Books are the ladder of human progress, the need of social development, the driving force of world progress, and even the need of all progress. It can make a person from bad to good, but there is a heated debate today to see who wins and who loses.

We think it is beneficial to open books. There are many small writers who write articles in the class. Didn't the material structure come from books? When the opposing debaters were neck and neck, Zou Hanyu picked up a comic book, and Zheng Zheng said, "We don't think it's necessarily good to open a book!

If you think about Japanese comics without control, you will fall into them. Among them, there are bad behaviors such as violence, which will lead primary school students to imitate. "I thought to myself: Hum, eating pears is good for the lungs, and eating dates is good for the stomach, but it also has side effects, and it is toxic. I hesitated for a while, stood up nervously and confidently and said, "As the saying goes, books have a golden house. As long as you open the book, you will gain knowledge. You can read more books, and reading good books can broaden your horizons and cultivate your sentiment. Therefore, we are completely sure that reading can be opened and beneficial. Can't you win some good ones? However, Li retorted, but primary school students have no right to be uniform. What about the bad side? Applause rang out from the audience. Create a sensation. I just didn't open the roof. Huang Ziting replied, "How old are you?" "12 years old," they said with difficulty. "You 12 years old people didn't control these frantic jumbles!

"Her tone with discrimination and suspicion, the audience applause more intense, the house collapsed. It seems that everything in the world is a double-edged sword, like medicine, which can cure diseases and is also toxic. Just reading is also good for opening books. But you can't open the book blankly, learn the good side and throw away the bad side.

Debate the sixth grade composition 3 one day, in the evening. "ah! I'm so sleepy, I'll go to bed first. " Xiao Ming patted his mouth with his hand.

After Xiao Ming fell asleep, there was a debate on his desk.

A signed football is neatly placed on the table. He saw a football thrown casually on it next to him and said in disgust, "You are so dirty. Stay away from me. Don't get me dirty. I am so clean." Football disdainfully replied to him: "Cut! Why, if you are clean? It's not practical at all I have never seen a young master use you, so you can only be a decoration. " The signed football was very angry and said, "Young Master didn't use me, which means I am precious. Young Master can't bear to use me." "As long as you are precious, don't you just write a few words on it? You have never seen any beauty. I really don't know what the young master thinks. " That football is still despised.

When they were arguing, the phone on the side couldn't stand it. He said to the football: "The role of signature football is decoration and collection. That's why he is always on the table. " Then he said to the signature football: "Ordinary football is used to kick around, so it will be dirty, but unlike them, you are used for collection and decoration, so it is clean." "Each of you has your own role. Don't compare your role with others."

In Friday's class, our class held a wonderful and grand debate with the theme "Is the development of science and technology beneficial or harmful?"

The main debaters for the positive side are Hu Luhan, Qu and me, while the debaters for the negative side are Feng Ming, Shen Yu and Fang Senmiao. The host solemnly announced: "The debate officially began! First of all, the first link, the two sides stated their views. "

As an active debater, I first stood up and said, "I think the advantages of technology outweigh the disadvantages." The debater replied, "I think the development of science and technology does more harm than good." Let's talk about the reasons in detail. First of all, it is stated that we sent Hu Luhan, and a powerful voice in the gourd said: "The development of science and technology is the road to a strong country. Without science, how can we live a happy life today? " Without science and technology, how can we have a comfortable material life and spiritual enjoyment? "After hearing Hu Luhan's speech, the opponent immediately stood up and retorted:" How many amazing changes have taken place in the world since mankind entered the 2 1 century. While people are delighted with the rapid development of science and technology, they have also experienced more disasters. In addition to the panic caused by the development of high technology, especially biotechnology, war and disease seem to directly bring mankind to the door of hell. The students are arguing enthusiastically.

This class ends with the students' debate. The host concluded: "The development of science and technology is important, but it cannot be developed on the premise of reasonable and normal use. Development must first purify the mind. Only when everyone's mind and soul are developed can science and technology be developed and improved, and the developed high-tech can always benefit human development and natural harmony.

Debate Grade 6 Composition 5 Dear teachers and students:

Hello everyone!

Lies are not good, but today, we have added an attribute in front-kindness. Then, his essence changed fundamentally. "There is not a saying that a white lie is beautiful. When we tell some little lies for the happiness and hope of others, lies become understanding, respect and tolerance, which has magical power.

For example, if a terminally ill patient is sentenced to death by a doctor, his parents, lover, children and all relatives will not directly tell him that "your life is hopeless", and you will not live long. Although all this is true, who will tell the truth to their already miserable relatives as cruelly as a judge sentenced a prisoner to death? At this time, everyone will form a United front, keep silent about the truth, and use white lies to make patients full of hope for treatment and let patients spend the rest of their lives with peace of mind. Right? If you were the patient's family, would you tell him the truth?

White lies have magical power, encouraging you to make progress again and again, and never giving up for your dreams. Because the future road is completely illuminated by happy mood, life becomes better.

If confession is a mistake, I choose lies.

If telling the truth, being frank and being reckless is a kind of harm, I choose lies.

If it's for yourself or others to stop suffering and sadness, what's the harm of a little more lies?

Debate composition 6 "I don't agree, I can't look at it this way ..." "How did this happen? Excuse me, if that's the case, then ... "There were bouts of heated debates in the classroom. Is this the debate in our class?

Our theme this time is: Is it necessary to study? What is certain is that it is necessary. The opponent is: unnecessary. The pros and cons are ahead and evenly matched.

The debate began, and the opposing debater first expressed his opinion: "What's the use of reading? Learn to be independent and learn at home! " I immediately stood up and retorted: "What is independence? Is to learn to work by yourself and not rely on others. At home, your parents wake you up in the morning, help you find clothes and make breakfast. You will never grow up because of your parents' doting. The research is different. It's entirely up to you. You learned to be independent without anyone's help. "

The debater immediately stood up and said, "I don't think we should go out to play at our age!" " Stay at home and read more! "We had a red-faced argument, and one of our classmates stood up and said confidently," Du Fu said well, studying in thousands of books and taking the Wan Li Road. Don't you become a bookworm by reading books every day? Besides, it's not just one person who is studying, but also a group of students! "I couldn't help clapping my hands for joy. But the debater retorted, "What if you encounter danger in your research? "What if Li Bai drowned?" Another of our classmates said, "But what you said is not true. If you want to say it, the safety measures for research are better, and we can't avoid natural disasters! " But the other party refuted it again. ...

We tied the debate, and the best debaters were Hu Yaoyang of the opposing side and Cao of the positive side. This makes me understand that when debating, we should be clear-headed, seize the weakness of the other side, and be witty and sensitive.

Debate composition 7 "I don't agree, I can't look at it this way ..." "How did this happen? Excuse me, if so, then … "There is a heated debate in the classroom.

"I think the food in the stall in front of the school is edible." Fang said. "We don't think the goods on the stall in front of the school can be eaten." Face to face. The classroom is noisy, so we are having a debate.

First, the square said that "the food in the stall is very popular with everyone, both cheap and delicious." However, the opponent added: "Don't think that you can eat something delicious. In fact, many unscrupulous businesses are added with expired and deteriorated things. "

At this time, Cao said, "The food there has no peculiar smell and is very cheap. There is a map of the QS production license on it, as well as an introduction to the date and address. " Opponent Hu Yaoyang frowned at this time and said, "Now the merchants are very bad, and sometimes they will show you fake maps. You think it's okay, but in fact they are lying to you. " You see, the meat on the stall is very cost-effective, and it is made of mouse meat and some unclean things. Didn't you know there was news the other day? A middle school student ate the food on the stall for a few days and finally died of poisoning, so the food on the stall in front of the door was not edible. "

At this time, the team in the square said, "If the food is clean, we can eat some, and there will be no problem." Our opponent added, "You don't know if you eat a few first, but it's too late to find out that you have physical problems ..."

In the end, our opponent definitely seized the loophole, and then the opponent won. I gained a lot from this debate and cultivated our eloquence.

Debate: You won't believe it even if it breaks the sky. On New Year's Eve, there was an earth-shattering "debate" in my pencil box.

The thing is this: every stationery thinks it is the most useful, but does not admit that others are more useful, so a debate is launched. Of course, "they" here refers to the stationery in the pencil case.

The debate has begun. Eraser, correction tape and correction fluid are a group, and pen, pencil and signature pen are a group. "We should be the most useful," said the pencil. "If you write your homework, you have to rely on us to write it!" Eraser immediately retorted angrily: "Then if you make a mistake, young master doesn't need us to correct it, so we should be the most useful!" " "Pencil added," what! If we don't make mistakes, we're finished, fool ... ""Hey, can you promise not to make mistakes? And watch your mouth, don't always swear, it always feels too awkward to listen! "When the pencil just wanted to say the word' hat', the eraser stopped it in time and cleverly refuted the pencil. Its accuracy and lethality are impeccable. Suddenly the pen said, "We didn't mean to make a mistake, but the young master made a mistake ..." I came before I finished-because I had been listening to their quarrels. I said: "In fact, everyone's strength is thin, but if the hearts are together, then even the giants don't have to be afraid! "Although they can't judge who is the most useful, they understand a truth-everyone's strength is limited, but as long as they unite, their strength will be great!

Debate composition 9 Next class in Grade 6, our class will hold a special debate. Debate on "Opening books is beneficial" and "Opening books is not necessarily beneficial".

As soon as the bell rang, the students entered the classroom. After a while, the teacher came up to us and said, "Students, we are going to have a debate today. The theme of this debate is whether it is beneficial to open books. " The teacher's words immediately made the quiet classroom noisy, and the students discussed together: "What is a debate? If we are positive debaters, how can we argue? " ..... "After the classroom quieted down, the teacher announced that the debate on whether Class Five (Class Four) is conducive to open books now begins, with girls arguing for the positive and boys arguing for the negative.

I stood up and said, "There is a golden house in the book, and there is Yan Ruyu in the book. Books are the "longevity fruit" of mankind. This book is of great help to us. " After I finished, there was a burst of warm applause at the scene. Teacher Liang, the host, also said that I spoke well, so I sat down and waited and watched.

Arqie Garden, the opponent, stood up and said, "Reading is of course good, but we are still young, so we have to be tempted to buy some books that are harmful to our body and mind, which will eventually lead to crime." After his argument, there was another round of warm applause from the audience. I was shocked. It seems that the strength of boys should not be underestimated. I was a little proud and immediately adjusted my nervousness. ..... For a whole class, everyone argued with each other and had a good time. It's really eight immortals crossing the ocean-each shows his magic power!

Finally, the teacher stopped this angry argument and said to everyone, "Open books are beneficial, so we must open books and let good books grow with us!" "

This is really an interesting debate, which not only exercises my language expression ability, but also increases my knowledge.

The teacher announced that there would be a debate at the class meeting on Wednesday. I was very excited when I first learned the news. I took out my manuscript and prepared it carefully.

In the evening, the teacher said that when the debate officially started, the classroom was silent. I tried to raise my hand, but I didn't raise it. After a while, a classmate raised his hand. Well said. Gave us a good start. Let me stop being timid. Unfortunately, our manuscripts are exactly the same, and the first round was wasted!

I thought to myself, I can't miss the opportunity for the first round of free debate. I want to seize the opportunity during the free debate. Free debate is not limited by time and words. It is improvisation and a good opportunity to show students' eloquence. The students all spoke enthusiastically, and the two sides did not give in to each other. I am no exception. I answered it twice. It's okay to feel like you. ...

The teacher summed it up. The teacher said that the debate was very successful, and the teacher praised several students. When I read my name, I had an incredible feeling, which was inspired by the last college debate. Finally, the teacher selected the best debater, and I applauded them! I also hope I can be a debater next time.

From this argument, I realized a truth. No matter what you do, be positive, so as to seize the opportunity!

On Wednesday afternoon, our class held a wonderful debate with the theme "Is it beneficial to open books?" .

Four debaters should be selected from the pros and cons, one of whom is the team leader. "The debate begins now!" Teacher Fan gave the order to kick off the debate. At this time, our (I'm sure) Wang Ruixin was the first to speak: "I think it's beneficial to open books because …" After listening to Wang Ruixin's reasons, I thought to myself: Wang Ruixin said everything, so the opposing party should be at a loss! Unexpectedly, the opponent is not to be outdone: Zhou Shiyi stood up and told some stories about some children reading comic books such as martial arts novels, which led to myopia and decreased grades. After Zhou Shiyi finished, our Hu Wenbo suddenly stood up and said that those primary school students read those comic books because of their mental problems, and it has nothing to do with the fact that opening books is not necessarily beneficial. Hu Wenbo's words shocked each other. The air in the classroom seems to have solidified, and you can even hear the sound of a needle falling to the ground. The audience was silent, and some relatives and friends in the opposition group were worried about the opposition, as if they were worried that the opposition would be defeated by the square. Just then, Ge Jiayi stood up again. Ge Jiayi's words broke the silence in the classroom. .......

The debate is still going on, and the debate between the two sides is neck and neck.

Debate contest 12 My mother has always refused to let me read leisure books, so I took preventive measures, that is, I will call the whole family together to hold a family "debate contest" today!

"I declare the official start of the family debate!" The positive is composed of me, my brother, my father and my uncle, while the negative is composed of my mother and giggle, and my grandparents are the judges. I spoke first: "I think we can read casual books, because ... because ..." My mother said firmly: "Think it over first, I don't think we can read casual books, because reading casual books not only affects children's study, but also delays their study time." Dad retorted, "You are wrong. Reading leisure books is a good thing, because children can also learn from books. " Aunt thought for a moment and said, "reading casual books is not necessarily a good thing." It may not be good for children to read something. " I replied: "But I remember Gorky said: Books are human nutrition. Is he wrong? " My uncle also said, "Yes, many great men say reading is a good thing. Are they all wrong? How to explain this? " The other party was "defeated" by us and couldn't say a word. "Well, I officially declare that the affirmative wins!" The younger brother added, "Wait a minute, I seem to remember' Tofu' saying: reading is like breaking thousands of books, and writing is like a god. This sentence. " We laughed together and said, "It's Du Fu!" My brother's face suddenly turned red.

The family debate ended in laughter.

Debating the Sixth Grade Composition 13 In this Chinese class, the teacher organized a debate on "opening books is beneficial".

The teacher invited eight students to the stage. Chen Yadong, Cao, Yao think that "opening books is beneficial". Wang Xingbao, Yao and Wang Xingbao think that "opening books is beneficial".

The teacher said, "The debate begins." The two sides are scrambling to explain the reasons that "opening books is beneficial" and "opening books is not necessarily beneficial". Chen Yadong first said: "Reading can increase your knowledge and make your grades better every day." Wang Feilong said, "If you read those yellow books, you will become a big hooligan."

His words made us laugh.

Chen Yadong added, "I wish I didn't read that kind of book." Wang Feilong also said, "If you keep reading that kind of book, your rogue knowledge will be higher and higher." His words made us laugh again, and my stomach hurt.

While they were arguing, Yan Huiting raised questions. At this time, they just talked about watching TV. Yan Huiting asked, "What did you learn from watching TV? Yao replied, "English." Yan Huiting asked again, "What words did you learn? ""English ""Is that all you have learned? "

Yao replied, "Yes." His words turned our class upside down again. The teacher asked eight of them to go down. Said to us: "This debate is really a tie!"