Articles describing social phenomena, using irony, are about 250 words.

Regarding the phenomenon of pseudo-illiteracy in textbooks, I have seen such a cartoon: in winter, in a place where mother and son got on the bus at a station, several well-dressed big men stood there, but turned a blind eye to the sign next to them. Next to the station, stood a woman with a baby in her arms. She was helpless, but she was afraid to say it.

I feel very angry after reading this cartoon. Are they really illiterate? Oh, no. How many real illiterates are there in today's society? I really can't read and feel inferior, and I have no face to stand here. And some look like cadres, and some deliberately close their eyes. How can they be illiterate?

In life, this kind of pseudo-illiteracy and selfish behavior is disgusting. For example, on the bus, there is a seat specially designed for the old, the weak, the sick and the pregnant, but many able-bodied young people sit there. However, when passengers with real special needs get on the bus, no one gives up their seats. Many people turn a blind eye to the slogan posted on the bus, "Please take the initiative to give up your seat to the elderly, sick and pregnant passengers". But there are also some illiterate children aged six or seven who will give them their seats. What is the phenomenon that children who are not sensible can do it regardless of false illiteracy? Are they not even as good as children? ! I think, for those vulnerable groups, even in the hot summer, they will feel chilly and chilling!

To tell the truth, it is disgusting to pretend to be a fake illiterate in a place with a clear slogan and deliberately violate the rules. Compared with those offenders who have not clearly and basically pointed out, such "fake illiteracy and selfish" talents are real villains. I really don't know why these people are doing this. Will it cost a lot to follow the slogan? No, at most, I walk too much, stand too much, wait too much, and feel a little tired, but what does it matter? I haven't seen you for a long time. Is it worthwhile to be an out-and-out villain who is "fake and illiterate and selfish"? It may be nothing to do once, but once you do it, there will be twice. Do it again and again, will it really be profitable? No, I lost it. I lost my morality.

Therefore, I appeal: don't be a "fake illiterate, fake selfish" villain just for the sake of quick results, even if you are a little tired, you can't be morally compromised!

Secondly, I thought of another question: apart from my own quality, what contributed to this kind of arrogance? I thought of that woman. The position where she got on the bus was occupied, and the sign "Mother and son get on the bus" is evidence. The truth is in the hands of women and can completely convince men. Why don't women go up and point to the sign and say to men, "Comrade, you are standing in the wrong place!" " "I can't believe those men are shameless enough to face the accusations of women without blushing at all! Perhaps, a weak woman is no match for a man, but after all, in the contest between right and wrong, right is always the winner. If the victory or defeat of right and wrong changes because of the strength of ability, what will society become? ! Mr. Hua's Pseudoilliteracy is vivid and meaningful. He criticized the behavior of "false illiteracy is really selfish" and told people to boldly make their own mistakes and not to change the wrong outcome because of their own abilities.

Not long ago, "Bai Han's war of abuse" broke out, causing an uproar. Here, I won't talk about the root of the incident, whether it's right or wrong. I don't understand literature, so I won't argue about what literature is not literature. I'm afraid it's not as simple as a literary debate. ) I'll just talk about a few social phenomena I saw from it.