Talk about development

You have no ability to explore in the wild. You have no experience in living in the wild, so your journey will be very dangerous.

Never think that you can explore the deep mountains by climbing one or two mountains. If you can swim across several small rivers, you can explore the island easily. The spirit of daring to explore is good. But we must be prepared for safety while exploring. Without security, even the best exploration will lose its meaning. Remember: you only have one life, and your departure will bring endless sorrow to your family and friends.

If you rush, you will be prone to danger. If you are a middle school student, you can add: As the motherland, you should pay more attention to self-protection, or middle school students should focus on learning. )

Accidents, lack of water and food, bad weather affecting the threat of wildlife, etc.

To some extent, exploration is the product of anthropocentrism. This concept holds that in the face of nature and its biological world, human beings can set foot everywhere, and as long as they can, they can "occupy the mountain as the king" and "insert the flag of Xinjiang" and take it for themselves. However, if we go beyond the thinking frame of "anthropocentrism", we can question: Is there no limit or restriction for human steps? As long as human footprints are gone, must they belong to human beings? Should it be dominated by humans? In fact, when the footprint of human exploration arrived, it was also the day when the disaster happened there. Isn't it? Humans fly into space, and the garbage in space has surrounded the earth; Man has climbed the "top of the earth"-Mount Everest, and the source of the Yangtze River has been polluted now. When human beings enter and leave the primeval forest, the "indigenous" animals and creatures there are disturbed and violated, and even destroyed ... Just as Columbus's exploration of the "New World" brought about the expansion of colonialism, today's "exploration" of human beings without self-discipline and restrictions also reflects the expansion of anthropocentrism. Science is a double-edged sword, so is exploration. Human exploration will leave dust where it leaves footprints.

Exploration will destroy the environment.

Refutation: We explore in order to better protect the environment, and through scientific exploration in those areas that humans have not yet deeply understood, we aim to better protect the natural heritage of these needles. We went to the Antarctic to study it and explore how to avoid the destruction of the Antarctic environment, so the modern exploration is to better protect the environment. If the other party insists on confusing the two, then may I ask the other party, is exploration more harmful or less harmful to the environment?

6 waste money:

Every step of mankind is a history of continuous exploration. We can't equate this exploration with money. The valuable information and experience gained in our exploration have brought benefits to mankind far beyond the measure of money. What's more, the ultimate goal of human beings to invent money is for the long-term survival and development of mankind? If our ignorance of nature leads to human disaster, what will money do? What can money be used for when all human beings are dead?

Time cannot be used to measure the value of exploration. The little time we spend exploring the road will bring long-term survival time to mankind.

7 Danger:

I'm afraid that human beings would not have today if they bowed their heads in times of danger. Our ancestors bowed their heads in the face of disasters. The danger paid by the explorers will be the happiness of the people. What's more, under modern technology, the danger of human exploration has been greatly reduced. We don't approve of blind exploration, and the spirit of exploration we want is scientific and rational.

8 colonial rule

In modern society, is this still a problem? To take a step back, even in modern times, human exploration brought colonial rule, but on the other hand, we should not forget that behind colonial rule was the expansion of human modernization, which also brought advanced science and culture to the colonies and prayed for the modernization of these countries. Although full of blood, the history of human development is a bloody history. Even without exploration, this blood will not disappear. And in modern history, it was also colonial rule.

For example, when humans go into space, space junk constantly threatens human beings.

1995 During the launch of the space shuttle Columbia, the door of the space shuttle collided with a piece of space junk, leaving a scratch about an inch deep on the surface. If that piece of garbage enters the cabin and hits a hole in the cooling system, Houston Space Control Center will immediately give an order to let the space shuttle return to the ground. Nasa foresaw the interference of space junk in advance, and on the basis of many flights, they partially closed a door of the commercial payload module to better protect the payload module of the space shuttle. Judging from the metal scraps left in the scratches, the staff speculated that space junk might be a chip of a circuit board. As for where it came from, it's hard to say, it may have originated from an explosion. Explosions in space are very common. 1996, a rocket exploded after launch, causing 700 pieces of 4-inch-long debris to be pushed into space orbit.

From the perspective of a parent, I will object for the following reasons.

1 There are many unknown dangers and difficulties, which are unpredictable.

Once injured, the child's self-help and self-care ability is still insufficient.

3 Limited field viability. Once trapped, what to eat? Drink? Direction? Have you thought about it?

4 is psychological preparation enough?

5 professional skills are not enough

Personal point of view