As for why the ape leader has the same name as the villain, it's just a coincidence, or to enhance the irony. But I don't agree with this statement, because don't forget, the message in the space sta

As for why the ape leader has the same name as the villain, it's just a coincidence, or to enhance the irony. But I don't agree with this statement, because don't forget, the message in the space station shows that the formation of the Planet of the Apes is actually mankind's own mistake, which also shows that there is no Planet of the Apes corresponding to the Earth. And now there is a law of non-conservation of parity (which refers to the asymmetric motion of matter that is a mirror image of each other in weak interactions). So I still agree with the first explanation. Of course, don't forget, after all, the 2001 Tim Burton version of "Planet of the Apes" is a remake of the 1968 classic. Since it is a remake, it naturally has to have shadows of the original version. This is the most basic respect. In the old version of "Planet of the Apes", the protagonist actually returned to the future due to the time effect, and finally discovered that the planet he thought was not the Earth turned out to be the Earth N years later. Will the ending of the new version have the same meaning as the ending of the old version? Is there a third explanation? I have not read the old version and cannot specifically compare the differences between the new and old versions, so I am not clear about this third explanation. But the classic status of the old version cannot be shaken by the new version...