The leader always compares me with my colleagues.

For the purpose of competition

People don't like to weaken themselves and compare with others. If competition is the purpose, comparison is the most direct means.

I remember the experience of exams when I was a child. Once I fell out of the top five, I worked hard for a while and returned to the top five. This is the advantage of comparison. In a competitive environment with clear goals, ranking is very effective as long as an atmosphere of chasing after each other is formed.

However, the premise that can be compared should have a similar basis, and there are similarities and differences. Comparing different situations, it is hard to say that it is more helpful. I used to be in charge of sales management data in overseas markets. I did more detailed work at that time. We conducted business analysis by country, considered more differences, and did not join the ranking of business income between countries. Until the policy changed and joined the national income ranking, it was simple and rude at once. It is conceivable that countries and cities are very different, even celebrating festivals is different. Moreover, some overseas countries have a high proportion of employees outsourcing, and this ranking is basically invalid.

If resources can be aligned, ranking comparison is meaningful and employee motivation is logical.

2

Comparison itself has no value.

In most cases, the comparison between people is untenable. Although two people do different things, they are not arithmetic addition and subtraction, so it is difficult to tell them apart.

Psychologist Adler said that comparison is because of competition. We have been taught rewards and punishments since childhood, so a person's value will be misinterpreted and always want to win or lose. To some extent, we don't need to compare and get a kind of value confirmation, we just need to be ourselves.

But competition is more likely to be created as an organizational atmosphere, a workplace culture that pursues high performance and encourages team PK. Whether the team's products are good or not will be evaluated according to the growth after being put on the market. Sometimes two teams of the same size play the same game at the same time, and one of the games becomes a winner of PK.

three

Give play to irreplaceable advantages

Some comparisons are meaningless. For example, your boss compares you with a colleague and is suspected of personal attack. Team members are not pure opponents, but should treat everyone as partners and lend each other a helping hand.

People are unpredictable. In reality, we may encounter more comparisons between people, and it is difficult to be completely detached. The person who does this must have his reasons, either to manipulate the relationship or to find a better way to give full play to his own advantages before he spends his heart on it.

Correctly speaking, people don't need to compare with each other. As the saying goes, the ruler has his strengths and the inch is short. It is better to give full play to his strengths and highlight his own characteristics. Rainbow Dream Team doesn't mean that everyone is awesome, but that everyone has advantages that others can't replace, so that everyone has the opportunity and needs Qi Xin's concerted efforts to do difficult things well. As soon as something is not done well, the leader will move out his colleagues who have left their jobs for comparison.

"When XX is around, the error rate is less than half of yours!"

"This month's performance is not good, not as good as the performance before XX."

"I should fire you, not XX."

Why do leaders always compare you with your former colleagues?

Why do leaders always compare their former colleagues?

First, in order to stimulate your self-motivation.

Maybe your supervisor is really dissatisfied, but the leader certainly won't really think that the resigned colleague is better than you, otherwise the leader will keep you. This comparison is just a hint. If you don't work hard, you will be resigned, giving you a sense of crisis and making you work hard.

Second, comparing with former colleagues will not bring any consequences.

If you compare with your colleagues at work, this kind of words will inevitably lead to instability in the company. But comparing you with your former colleagues, there will be no consequences if the client is gone. Therefore, it is a lower cost way to compare the former colleagues.

Third, the situation will be more complicated if the departing colleagues leave voluntarily.

If a colleague is poached, then the leader talks about him every day and compares you, probably to train you as a successor to your former colleague. At this time, you can subconsciously learn some excellent habits of your former colleagues. For the boss who just lost his lover, it is undoubtedly a gratifying thing to find a similar subordinate quickly.