Now some teachers ask the group leader to correct the homework papers, and many of them are wrong. Is this ok?

First of all, I think it's best for the teacher to correct the homework himself, because the children will take the homework corrected by the teacher seriously, which will help to cultivate the habit of writing carefully. Also, the teacher's comments after correcting homework can give children great encouragement and confidence in learning.

The group leader can help the teacher to correct dictation and recitation homework. This kind of homework team leader can help the teacher check it out. But the teacher can't just ask the team leader to correct it, and then ask what the result is. Each team leader should issue a homework correction record book to record the situation of each homework correction. What is not completed should be recorded, and what is completed with good quality should also be recorded. Teachers should make clear rewards and punishments according to their homework notebooks. At the same time, you can also find common mistakes according to the notebook, and then focus on the explanation. Doing so can not only exercise children's ability, but also give teachers more time to study textbooks and prepare lessons carefully.

But at the same time, teachers should also be alert to whether the team leader is competent. It is reported on the internet that students will give the group leader some small favors in order not to finish their homework and not to be discovered by the teacher. In the long run, the style of study in the class will be in a mess, and many students will follow suit and give the team leader some benefits. After a long time, it is possible to give money to the team leader. How terrible! It's always hard for you to explain when your parents know.

Also, I think teachers should correct the knowledge homework in the new lesson by themselves. Because this kind of homework, on the one hand, helps students to consolidate the knowledge they have learned, on the other hand, gives feedback to the teacher on the students' mastery of new knowledge points, which is helpful for the teacher's next teaching. Don't give this to the group leader, don't know the learning situation, just concentrate on completing the teaching task by yourself. Presumably, children's academic performance is also worrying.

Conclusion: The group leader can help the teacher manage the class and correct the homework, but the teacher can't give up. If so, the students have not mastered this knowledge point, and the teacher has no concept. There may also be petty corruption, which destroys the class style and study style, and it is not worth the loss!

Pay attention to Lao Zhang of Xingtan, share campus life and exchange educational topics.

My view is clear-cut: it is not only wrong for the teacher to ask the group leader to correct the test paper, but also suspected of dereliction of duty and misleading the children. The relevant departments must attach great importance to it, and parents should respond to the school and resolutely resist this phenomenon without delay.

Teacher-what a respectable gardener. The ancients said, "If you have a threesome, you must have a teacher." The teacher worked hard silently. How can we be "gratified" when peaches and plums are all over the world?

Correcting homework, especially test papers, is not only the core for teachers to test their own teaching level, but also the core for students to understand and develop their abilities. It is also a process for teachers to learn and suck again, correct in time, verify in time and improve in time.

Study, study, and study again. Correcting homework, whether teachers or students, their understanding and learning is self-evident.

We used to study very well in class, and each class chose a representative of each subject. The representative's work can only be limited to distributing materials and collecting homework. No matter how excellent the branch representative is, he can't replace the teacher. The teacher's responsibility is more important than Mount Tai.

The whole society should attach great importance to this phenomenon of inaction, no effort and no sense of responsibility, correct it in time, and let children learn a beautiful atmosphere. what do you think?

Thank you for reading.

Students' papers should not be corrected by the group leader, because teachers ask students to take the exam, on the one hand, they are required to do more questions and practice more, and more importantly, teachers can learn about students' learning through the exam. Where students have mastered and what they don't understand, teachers should also have correction records when correcting students' papers, and also indicate which students are wrong. It is convenient for the teacher to have a clear mind when explaining the test paper. So students' papers can't be corrected by the group leader at all. Teachers themselves must correct students' test papers in order to truly grasp students' learning situation.

If students correct each other's homework, I think it is possible and possible. A few minutes before the teacher starts a new lesson, when the teacher checks the students, the whole class is correcting and correcting each other's homework at the same time. It is impossible and not allowed for students to correct class assignments and students to correct test papers. Thank you all.

Hello, I'm a teacher, too, but I never ask students to correct homework again, but sometimes the calculation problems we do in class will be corrected by our peers, because it's simple, just look at the calculation process and results, and you can also rethink the calculation process while watching other people's calculation process, adding the steps of vertical calculation and offline calculation.

Homework is generally based on copying and exercise books. Copied homework can be corrected by the team leader, but it is somewhat unreasonable for the team leader to correct the homework. After all, teachers can develop students' knowledge in the process of correcting homework-what knowledge students can master and what knowledge students are unfamiliar with. If the group leader corrects, how can the teacher master the "weight" of the exercises?

At present, many primary schools do have many students in each class, and some classes can reach 60 students, which is not only bad for students' study, but also bad for teachers to correct their homework. For example, Chinese subjects, in addition to exercise books, as well as large and small compositions, Tian Zige and so on, need to be corrected. Maybe some teachers are really busy, so let the group leader do it for them. Whatever the reason, I personally feel that it is always wrong to ask students to correct their homework. One of the duties of a teacher is to carefully correct students' homework. I know a lot of Chinese teachers, who can't finish their homework during the day and take it home at night.

So as long as most teachers can do it, a few should not emphasize other objective reasons. As a qualified teacher, they should do the most basic work!

Now some teachers ask the group leader to correct homework and test papers. Is it okay? I think so, too. I wrote an article before, and part of it was about how to train top students. In my practice, letting the group leader correct homework is one of the ways. The following specific analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the group leader to change homework, and how to correctly use the group leader to change homework.

First, at present, the country does not allow large classes, so the number of students in a class is mostly around 40. Every student I take will be divided into large groups and small groups. Large groups must have homework, papers and classroom exercises, and the group leader is responsible. Including daily rotation.

A * * * five groups, each group leader is The monitor on duty, responsible for discipline every day, arrange reading. It is really five excellent children, one every day from Monday to Friday. Teachers almost don't have to worry about chores, they will cover everything and be careful. I'll talk about how to train such excellent class cadres later.

Second, each large group will be subdivided into four groups. Generally, there are four students with good grades, two with average grades and one with poor grades. Ok, that's the team leader. Responsible for correcting homework and checking endorsements every day. What are the advantages of this arrangement?

Two students with average grades basically don't have to worry. They can finish their homework on time and recite it. The group leader's energy is concentrated on this slightly poor child, who is responsible for checking his homework every day. When he found any mistakes, he immediately stared at him to correct them. If the teacher corrects the homework, marks it incorrectly and sends it back, it may not be changed. But the team leader stared at him almost one-on-one, and he had to correct it. In this way, when the team leader checks, it is equivalent to learning it again and strengthening the memory. When students encounter mistakes, they should correct them at that time, which is conducive to correction. This is * * * won. Poor students are getting better and better, team leaders are becoming more and more proficient in knowledge, and their grades are getting better and better. Similarly, the team leader is responsible for the work of the team leader.

Third, talk about what the teacher is responsible for. It doesn't mean that all the homework is pushed to the team leader. I listen to my homework before class every day. Who wrote it, who didn't, and how the team leader handled it. Here, the group leader will only report at first, and the teacher will not forget to bring it after finishing his homework. Let me handle everything. I later held a group meeting every two weeks to teach them methods. Now, who hasn't finished writing? The team leader asked him to fill it up. No matter who made a few mistakes, they were asked to correct them. You see, the effect is so good. After listening to the report, I will randomly take one or two tests. Because it is random, it will have an impact on the work of the group leader, and they will never perfunctory the teacher, because once found, the group leader will be dismissed. That would be a big loss. The team leader usually gives me some novel and interesting stationery or certificates at the end of the term.

Fourth, everyone wants to be a team leader. What shall we do? Take turns. Generally, there are two children with average grades in a group, and these two children may surpass the group leader with a little effort, so everyone catches up with their studies and helps them, and the grades of the whole class have improved.

Fifth, talk about the examination paper correction. I really didn't ask the students to correct this. Why? Because the teacher mainly depends on where the child is wrong and what knowledge he has not mastered. Even if the students help you correct it, you'd better read it yourself.

6. Where did so many excellent team leaders and monitor come from? Many teachers say that no child in my class can be a monitor. What do we do? Cultivate. For example, this year, there really aren't many good students in the class, so I just randomly selected some older children from those with good grades to try. At the end of the current semester, two students have been trained.

One of them got a good grade and the other got an average grade. But they are all better than the figure. This may be related to personal habits. Every student in our class likes to find a big man when choosing a monitor. But neither of the two children is strong enough. What do we do? Teaching. Always teach them what to do under any circumstances. At the same time, help them establish their prestige.

Specifically, push them out first. When the teacher is away, just look at the discipline and remember their names. You can call the roll, criticize, and not hit your classmates. If you are really disobedient, write your name on the blackboard and wait for the teacher to deal with it. Generally, I will punish students whose names are recorded and let the monitor make it clear. Why do you remember these names? Ok, I'll take care of it next. After a while, the prestige of the small monitor gradually stood up. Then find it later, and occasionally use other children. Observing the performance, after the first grade, five qualified monitor will be freshly released. With such five little assistants, you can have fun, teacher.

Finally, I want to say that good deeds should be done well, and parents should not misunderstand that the teacher has pushed everything to the children. The picture in the middle is my honor list. If the child behaves well, he will get a star. If he makes a mistake, he will be cut off. By the end of the term, children with many stars can get their certificates. You see, the solution is always more difficult than the reality.

As a teacher, I don't think this is appropriate. When a teacher takes a new lesson, he needs to know the students' mastery of this part of knowledge through the information feedback from homework. If the teacher doesn't correct his homework, how can he know what's wrong with the students? How to remedy it?

Several years ago, I had a colleague. Because of cervical spondylosis, homework was corrected by class cadres for some time. After correcting the class cadres, they simply looked through it, scored it, and recorded the date.

At that time, his cervical spondylosis was better, but the mid-term exam of that semester made him like cervical spondylosis better and corrected his homework by himself. That mid-term exam was the worst in his class, and five children failed.

At that time, he didn't believe that the children in his class could do such a simple question wrong. This colleague told us that the teacher really can't be lazy once. If they don't correct the students' homework in person, the students' problems will not be found, and they can't afford to do that kind of problem in the exam.

Since then, this colleague suffered from cervical pain again. He put up with it and corrected his homework by himself. Through the feedback of homework, what he should tell the whole class will be told by the whole class, and individual tutors will be pulled to the front one by one.

After half a semester's hard work, their final exam scores returned to the first place in the grade.

Conclusion: Correcting homework is a part of teachers' work and their duty. If the students correct, the teacher can't find the problem and can't explain and remedy it. If students correct for a long time, it is even more irresponsible to students. I don't agree with this for a reason.

First, the school evaluates teachers, and homework is one of them. In order to evaluate professional titles or excellent teachers, teachers have to cope with these projects, but also prepare lessons, attend classes and correct homework themselves. I have no choice but to ask my classmates for help. This is one of the reasons.

Second, some teachers, due to personal family and other special reasons, such as the illness of the elderly and children, are temporarily too busy, but occasionally ask students to help correct them.

Thirdly, teachers really want students to correct each other's homework, see what others have done and reflect on their own homework, which is also reasonable.

However, I think for whatever reason, teachers had better not do this in order to educate children. Otherwise, the students won't say anything, but they know in their hearts that the teacher is cheating. In this way, students are not convinced and affect the image of teachers. This is a very bad practice.

Schools should also properly ask teachers to correct their homework, instead of looking at the quantity of homework correction unilaterally, they should pay more attention to quality, so as to achieve good results.

The above is my own opinion, welcome your attention and comments.

You can't.

Doing so is not conducive to teachers discovering the situation of each student, and it is also not conducive to their knowledge transfer.

Teachers must do their duty. You are a master and an employee, so you must be conscientious.

Now some teachers ask the group leader to correct the homework papers. I don't think it's appropriate. It has some disadvantages. This is a little good for cultivating the working ability of the group leader, but it is not good for the whole class. Students' homework is to digest and consolidate what they have learned that day. Only by practicing targeted homework can they further understand and apply the knowledge they should have. Teachers can learn about students' learning situation and problems in their own teaching by correcting students' homework and examination papers in each exam. If the homework assigned by the teacher is corrected by the group leader every day, the teacher will not be able to grasp the children's learning in time, and the knowledge that should be mastered will not be solid. At the same time, teachers themselves will not be able to correctly evaluate how their classes are going and whether students understand what should be taught. Only when the teacher corrects the children's homework will these problems be solved, and you can find out the reasons why the children made mistakes in their homework and let them correct them in time. By correcting homework, you can also find some shortcomings or problems, which is also helpful to continuously improve your business ability. So I actively support teachers to correct children's homework in person.

I'll tell you why, because education has deteriorated. Compulsory education is mainly public schools, but now there are too many private schools, and high-quality students have been taken away.

People with low IQ will think that public schools fail to live up to expectations. Please open your eyes and see that private schools have many excellent students because of their privileges. If we don't give them the privilege to recruit students, private schools will all disappear within a few years.

Look at what students are left in public schools now. Parents and students are poor. A class can't find an all-round student, and many subjects average 30-40 points and 40-50 points. If you work hard, you may get a few points to ten points, but when you come back at the weekend, your previous efforts will be in vain. You strictly control students and force them to recite? Parents will come after you and make things difficult for you. Students also have too much homework that affects them from jumping off buildings by playing mobile phones and computers. In this era, will you still take risks to force students to study?

Nowadays, parents don't want to pay a penny, never care about their children's learning, and try their best to get rid of their children's learning. They don't seem to understand that teachers can ignore your children, because they don't own them, and at most they will be scolded for being immoral, but they don't care about their children, and finally the children degenerate and repay their parents.

Do you think the current teacher doesn't want to continue to realize his initial intention? No, the treatment was divided into three or five times, and all the work was done. It is not as good as leaders and senior teachers who only have one class a day. Education has gone bad. You said it wasn't for the money. I'm not that great. You say I have no morals? Front-line teachers do everything, but they are nearly half less than others every month. Who will complain? Society is so unfair, you'd better be kind to yourself. You have a wall ladder I used to have. The people above you can get a high salary by doing nothing, and it is not hard and fast to change your homework. You can do it or not, and you won't do it. This is the teacher's principle now, don't you accept it? Sue if you can. It's no use complaining. Your children should take care of themselves and don't blame others.